Advanced Search Results

A.M. Shamsudeen Vs. A.M. Mohamed Salihu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 92, 104, 105, 115 and 144 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 23, Rule 1(3) - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 45, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; Madras Prohibition Act - Sections 4-A; Wakf Act, 1995

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ526

wakf property. There is also a plea that the civil Court has no jurisdiction after the enactment of Wakf Act, 1995. The written statement was filed before the Court on 4.2.2002 and on 20.2.2002, an application was filed under … not adjudicate any matter in controversy with reference to the suit. It is not an appealable order under section 104 C.P.C. or anyone of the orders under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC. Section 105 CPC expressly provides that

M.P. Wakf Board Vs. Subhan Shah (D) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 3(1), 4, 4(3), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6(1), 6A, 25, 25(7), 25(8), 27 and 66C; Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 7(5), 9, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 83 and 104; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 54 and 55

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC8(SC); 2007(2)CTC830; [2007(2)JCR284(SC)]; 2006(11)SCALE71; (2006)10SCC696; 2006(3)ShimLC382; 2006(2)LC1432(SC)

said Munna Bai under Section 25 of the 1954 Act was barred by limitation. The Parliament enacted the Wakf Act, 1995 (for short 'the 1995 Act'). The 1954 Act was amended by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The State … inquiry into the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the said application. 8. We may notice that Section 104 of the 1995 Act is in pari materia with Section 66-C of the 1954 Act, which reads as

The Janab. O.K.N.Mohammed of Saliqu President of Masjid Baharsha Oliyu ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

over the Management and accounts within 15 days, failing which, action would be initiated under Section 68 of Wakf Act, 1995. 7. The plea of the Petitioner is that there is absolutely no necessity to invoke Section 65 of … S.A.K.Ibrahim and Others Vs. The Chief Executive Officers, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and Others reported in (2014(2) CWC 104), wherein, it is interalia observed that 'Writ Petition under Article 226 is not maintainable and further that effective

Chintala Uday Shankar and ors. Vs. Subedar Saheb Choultry, Trust Board ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 9, 22, 26, 36 and 43; Muslim Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 5, 6, 15, 32(2), 36, 36B, 36F, 43, 55, 55(2), 56, 66, 89, 90 and 92; Andhra Pradesh Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 83, 85, 107 and 112; Societies Registration Act - Sections 4; Specific Relief Act - Sections 31; Trusts Act - Sections 10; Limitation Act - Articles 59, 63 and 64; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Wakf Rules - Rule 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91, 92, 92(1), 92(2), 92(3), 93 and 151 - Order 1, Rule 10; Inams Act - Sections 14; Muslim Law; Mohammedan Law

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD213

Matched in: Advocate O. Manohar Reddy, Adv. in A.S. No. 1194 of 2004, C.R.P. Nos. 2773, 2793, 2815, 2961, 2967, 2989 and 3138 of 2002 and ;B. Adinarayana Rao, Adv. in C.R.P. Nos. 2882, 2990 to 2995, 3134 and 3146 of 2002 K. Ramakanth Reddy, SC for Wakf Board for Respondent No. 1 in A.S. No. 1194 of 2004 and in C.R.P. No. 3138 of 2002 and ;M.V. Durga Prasad, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in A.S. No. 1194 and in C.R.P

M.H.Jawahirullah Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Wakf Act of 1995 and further direct the 1st respondent to strictly follow the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 in constituting the Wakf Board. Writ Petition in W.P.No.27590 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of the … and direct the first respondent to constitute a Wakf Board on following the due procedure set out in Section 14 of the Wakf Act, 1995. Writ Petition in W.P.No.33785 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of … challenge the provisions of Sections 13, 14, 32(a), 38, 61, 72 and 104 of the Act is that believers of Muslim faith have been divided

Punjab Wakf Board Vs. Sham Singh Harike

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

land which was Wakf property, the suit clearly lay before the Wakf Tribunal as per Section 83 of Wakf Act, 1995.11. He submits that Wakf Tribunal was conferred jurisdiction of entertaining every dispute pertaining to Wakf in the Wakf … 7 marlas, comprising in khewat No.462, khatauni Nos.589, 593, 599 and 596 in khasra Nos.103, 105, 102 min, 104, 106, of village Birmi, Tehsil and District Ludhiana. The appellant had let out the above-mentioned land to Sham

Maulana Kureshi Gulam Mustafa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 25, 26, 76 and 165; Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 13 and 14

Reported in : AIR2002Guj252

Masjid Trust, Bharuch. In the State of Gujarat. By this petition, he has challenged the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 Act 43/94) which received the assent of the President on 22-11-1995 and it came into force in the … in the State of Gujarat with effect from 2-12-1996.2. The main ground of challenge to the provisions of Sections 13, 14, 32(a), 38, 61, 72 and 104 of the Act is that in the Constitution of the

Tukaram Vs. Sayyed Zahurul-Haqu and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Apex Court are of no use to the defendant, petitioner. The dispute from present matter is covered under Wakf Act, 1995. 15. A case reported as 1997 (4) ALL MR 303 [basharatulla son of Syed Asraf Mohiuddin V/s The … that period was then changed first time in the Amendment of 1984 and then in Wakf Act of 1995 (Section 107) a provision was made that Limitation Act is not applicable to Wakf properties. Before coming into force

Muslim Jama-Ath Santhwanam Trust, vs Kerala State Waqf Board,

Court : Kerala

No.6. The main contention before this Court was that there was violation of provisions of Section 32(2)(j) of Wakf Act which envisaged that such transaction can be only sanctioned with a majority of not less than two-third of … 2023 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1945 PETITIONER: MUSLIM JAMA-ATH SANTHWANAM TRUST, CHENNAMPALLY BUILDING, FERRY ROAD, NORTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 104 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, C.A.HYDROSE HAJI, S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, CHENNAMPILLY HOUSE, FERRY ROAD, NORTH KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 104.

Raja Alias Mohammed Ali Ismail Sait vs the Kerala State Wakf Board

Court : Kerala

688035 BY ADVS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE.T.A T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ K.P.MAJEED K.M.MOHAMMED YUSUFF (M-1323) SHANKAR V. RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682017 2 ABDUL LATHEEF SAIT … the application before theWAQF Board was filed under Sections 32, 47, 69, 70 and 71 of the WAQF Act, 1995. Section 32 deals with the general power of the Board. Section 47 provides for the audit of the accounts … Writ Petition is perfectly maintainable. 1.Bombay Co.Ltd. v. State (Kerala) [1952 KHC 104],2. Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal Kotah [1955 KHC 374 (SC)], 3.Hari Vishnu