Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: value added tax act 2003 section 89 · Page 1 of about 878 results (0.097 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 27 2023

Luster Gold Palace India Pltd Represented by Its Director M.P Ahammed ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2023

refund of the excess amount paid as interest as provided under Section 89(2) and (4) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003 read with Section 60(5) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003.2. The petitioner is a registered dealer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2024

M/S. N.R. Patel & Co. vs the Assistant Commissioner,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-27-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

the 27th day of March, 2024 The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and is engaged in execution of contract awarded by the Bharat Petroleum Company Ltd. The assessment for the … 1st respondent to compute the total refund amount due to the petitioner with upto-date interest as provided under Section 89 of the KVAT Act.2. During the pendency of the said writ petition, anotice dated 09.04.2015, under Section 25

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2023

Future Frames Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-12-2023

respondent to process the refund amount as per Exhibit P-1 with interest under Section 89 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.2. The petitioner is a dealer under the provisions of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. Initially

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 30 2007

State of Assam and ors. Vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Tobacco Product ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-30-2007

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

discriminatory because of the exemption granted to the goods specified in the schedule and taxable under the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, which are produced and manufactured within the State of Assam, by virtue of Section 5 of the 2001

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2019

Union of India Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-24-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

upon where the question of computation of taxable turnover came up for consideration in the context of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, with respect to all regular trade discounts and they are allowable as permissible deductions, if proper proof is … telecom sector was liberalized under the National Telecom Policy, 1994 and various licenses were issued to companies under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. The licences granted to the service providers 4 stipulated a fixed … 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 4,855 2,666 89,108 1,05,061 1,43,044 1,44,232 1,60,251 1,82,637 2,04,221 2,24,430 2,37,676 6. However, the telecom

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2025

M/S.Josco Fashion Jewellers vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-13-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

WPC No.11335/2018 & conn.cases 53 Act, on and from the date of commencement of this Act,-(i) the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (30 of 2004) except inrespect of goods included in entry 54 of the State List of the Seventh … 16.09.2016, the State’s legislative power to tax on those items now removed from that Entry. They insist that Section 19 of the CA Act allows “interim or temporary continuation” of all the Acts made earlier under the … it is emphatically 42[] (2007) 10 SCC 306 WPC No.11335/2018 & conn.cases 89the duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. Those

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2014

Subhash Goyal Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-13-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

CST Act.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no provision in the Act or Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “VAT Act”.) whereby the Director of a company which was in liquidation could be … accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CWP No.26775 of 2013 -2- sales tax exemption under Section 13-B of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (in short “the Act”.) read with Rule 28-A of … to the petitioner for the recovery of outstanding dues amounting to ` 89,29,051/- relating to M/s Bhagwati Wooltex Pvt. Ltd. on account of sales tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2014

vi) Whether the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in 32 STC 77 Vs. Sta ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-14-2014

Subject : Sales Tax

appellant. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, (in short, “the Act”.) against the orders dated 31.8.1994, 30.6.2003 and 8.7.2013, Annexures A.4, A.5 and A.10 respectively … and 8.7.2013, Annexures A.4, A.5 and A.10 respectively in STR No.41 of 2007-08 for the assessment year 1988- 89, claiming following substantial questions of law:- “i)Whether the different notices issued showing different basis for initiation of proceedings

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2022

M/s. Total Environment Building Systems Pvt Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-02-2022

Subject : Service Tax

the Finance Act, 1994 as amended from time to time, were also liable to tax under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, (KVAT) for the sale of advertisement material following the creation of the design­ concept, was considered by this … a contract for sale are relevant but not exhaustive. K. In paragraph 89 of the Larsen and Toubro Limited and Another (supra) this Court observed … introduction of the Finance Act, 2007, by which the Finance Act, 1994 came to be amended to introduce Section 65(105)(zzzza) pertaining to Works Contracts?.3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 07.10.2009 passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2025

State of Rajasthan & Ors. versus Combined Traders

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2025

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 816

sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Rules read with Sections 48 and 16(4) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Even the registration certificates of the said firms were cancelled. Before the said order, the third appellant issued … declarations/forms. The High Court held that sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Rules was ultra vires Sections 8(4), 13(1) (d), 13(3) and 13(4)(e) of the CST Act. The validity of sub-rule 20 of rule 17

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial