Advanced Search Results

India Heritage Foundation Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 35, 38(1), 39, 60, 77(1), 79, 82, 82(1), 83 and 85; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957

Reported in : (2008)18VST376(Karn)

that the petitioner appears to have filed a 'nil' return of liability under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Act') for the months October, November and December, 2006.3. The controversy in the writ petition … criminal court is also not enabled to either set aside or modify the assessments as expressly provided in Section 85 of the Act. The compounding of offence in terms of Section 82 of the Act is by admitting

Mahalaxmi Traders and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 32(4), 33, 34, 44, 46, 67, 70, 70A, 73, 74 and 85(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Value Added Tax Rules, 2006 - Rules 29(1) and 85(2)

Reported in : (2009)19VST92(Guj)

and also for a prayer to declare that the action is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ('the VAT Act', for short) and the Rules made thereunder. It is also prayed for quashing and setting … also for appropriate order for restraining the respondent No. 2 from issuing the communication/notices to third parties under Section 44 of the VAT Act. It is required to be noted that identical prayers are also asked for … VAT Act specifically stating that it may amount to violation of Rule 85(2) and therefore notice at annexure C in S.C.A. No. 7804 of 2008

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 62(1), 43, 67, 74 and 94; Central Excise Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Finance Act, 2006; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)6VST390(Ker)

is the petitioner in W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006. Appeal was preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Rules challenging the clarificatory order dated April 7, 2006 passed under Section … P2 notification dated January 21, 2006 is inoperative and unenforceable so far as it varies from HSN Code 8516.79.20.3. Appellant, hereinafter referred to as 'the company', is engaged in the manufacture, sale and marketing of household insecticide,

Commissioner of Vat Vs. Jupitor Exports

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal under Section 81 of Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “the Delhi VAT Act”), is directed against the order dated 07.01.2014 passed by … refund, the determination of specific questions ST.APPL.10/2014 Page 14 under section 84, the making of general rulings under section 85, and the conduct of audit or investigations shall, for the purposes of this Act, be the administrative functions.”

T.K.Anilkumar vs State Information Commission

Court : Kerala

cannot be provided under Section 8(1) (j) of the RTI Act, 2005 and Section 85 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, ‘KVAT Act’). Against Ext.P10, the 2nd respondent filed an appeal under the RTI Act, 2005 before

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

4. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 are the authorities exercising powers together with the State itself under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (for short MVAT ). 5. The petitioner, inter-alia, engages itself in the business of manufacturing pan masala. … but shall be assigned to that State. Then comes Article 268A which was inserted by Constitution (88th Amendment) Act, 2003 (section 2) and is titled as 'Service tax levied by Union and collected and appropriated by the Union and … Finance Act, 2005, additional duty of excise paid on p;an masala is by way of a surcharge under section 85. Notably, Article 270 clarifies that it does not apply to any surcharge covered by Article 271 of the

Uma Polymers Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)18VST213(Raj)

to coming into force of the provisions of the Rajasthan VAT Act 2003, the provisions of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1994 were in vogue and accordingly tax payable was to be given its meaning in consonance with Section … the period 2007-2008. The petitioner after filing the said application, received notice issued under Section 59 of the VAT Act 2003 calling upon the petitioner company to satisfy as to why the claim for the interest subsidy … filing the said application, received notice issued under Section 59 of the VAT Act 2003 calling upon the petitioner company to satisfy as to why

National Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Gayatri- Eci (Joint Ventur ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

fixed as 14th April 2009. Disputes arose between the parties, inter alia relating to: a) Reimbursement of enhanced Value Added Tax (hereinafter referred to as VAT) under Sub-Clause 70.6 of Conditions of Particular Application (hereinafter referred to as 'COPA') … November 2005, the applicable VAT was 12.5% as per entry 2 of schedule V to the Assam VAT Act, 2003. This remained the same throughout the contract period. The statutory provisions relating to the Composition Scheme for Works … India (hereinafter referred to as „NHAI‟) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the

V.J.Sebastian, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Act 1963 for the year 2002-03 for identical goods and the position now is exemption claimed under VAT Act 2003 for the same product. A perusal of the order of the Commercial Tax Officer reveals that at the … Act. The assessing authority rejected the return and completed the assessment under section 25(1) of the KVAT Act levying tax of 4% under serial number … 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADVS. S.K.DEVI SRI.SHANMUGHAM D. JAYAN RESPONDENT/S: … 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY … POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 101 OF 2019 TAVAT 85/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S:

V.J.Sebastian vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Act 1963 for the year 2002-03 for identical goods and the position now is exemption claimed under VAT Act 2003 for the same product. A perusal of the order of the Commercial Tax Officer reveals that at the … Act. The assessing authority rejected the return and completed the assessment under section 25(1) of the KVAT Act levying tax of 4% under serial number … 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADVS. S.K.DEVI SRI.SHANMUGHAM D. JAYAN RESPONDENT/S: … 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY … POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 101 OF 2019 TAVAT 85/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: