Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: value added tax act 2003 section 80 · Page 1 of about 1,267 results (0.160 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 17 2006

Candid Indstries Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 62(1); Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 6(1); Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)5VST381(Ker)

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 against the order passed by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2014

Gail (India) Ltd Vs. The State of Assam and Others

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-12-2014

Subject : Service Tax

12th September, 2011 passed by Additional Commissioner of Taxes, Assam (Annexure-11) is appealable under Section 80 of Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 before the Assam Board of Revenue. In a situation like the one where the petitioner has a statutory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2005

Gammon India Ltd. Vs. the Special Chief Secretary, Government of Andhr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-20-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5B; ;Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Sections 80, 80(2) and 80(3); ;Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 6, 8, 8A, 9 and 18; ;Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973; ;Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 61, 61(1), 61(2); ;Punjab General Clauses Act - Sections 4

Reported in : [2005]142STC370(AP)

1 VST 105, the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 was repealed under Section 61(1) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (See [2003] 130 STC Statutes (Suppl. B) 227.). While Section 61(2)(a) of the Haryana VAT Act, 2003 is … as illegal and without jurisdiction consequent upon the repeal of the APGST Act on April 1, 2005 by Section 80 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (VAT Act).2. The facts, to the extent necessary, for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 27 2006

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-27-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 62(1), 43, 67, 74 and 94; Central Excise Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Finance Act, 2006; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)6VST390(Ker)

is the petitioner in W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006. Appeal was preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Rules challenging the clarificatory order dated April 7, 2006 passed under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2015

M/s. Nandi Constructions Vs. The State of Karnataka represented by the ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-19-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: These petitions are filed under Section 65(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the judgment and order dated 16.01.2015 passed in STA Nos. 660 to 663/2014 and STA Nos. 664

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2009

Ernakulam District Rolling Shutter Fabricators Association and ors. Vs ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-25-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 8, 62(1) and 94; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2009)26VST499(Ker)

C.N. Ramachandran, J.1. This is an appeal filed under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter called, 'the Act') read with Rule 80(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2015

E. Ramamurthy (Deceased) Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Commissio ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-27-2015

Subject : Sales Tax

(Prayer: These STRPs. are filed under Section 65(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the Order dated 7.8.2014 passed in STA 3462-3469/2013 on the file of the Karnataka appellate tribunal, Bengaluru,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2015

E. Ramamurthy (Deceased) Vs. State of Karnataka, Rep. by the Commissio ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-27-2015

Subject : Sales Tax

(Prayer: These STRPs. are filed under Section 65(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the Order dated 7.8.2014 passed in STA 3462-3469/2013 on the file of the Karnataka appellate tribunal, Bengaluru,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2008

Fleming (T/a Bodycraft) (Respondent) Vs. Her Majestyand#8217;s Revenue ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Jan-23-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

of output tax and previously unclaimed deduction of input tax are provided for by section 80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 and regulation 29 of the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518). As originally enacted, section 80 … the amendment to section 80 was enacted to 31 March 1997, and taxpayers were given until 31 March 2003 to submit claims. Then, following the decision in the Grundig case, the transitional period was extended by three

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2016

Sonal Apparel Private Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-29-2016

Subject : MRTP

The petitioners in their respective petitions are seeking to question the vires of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, (Hereinafter referred to as the KVAT Act, for brevity.) 3. It is a common ground of the petitioners … It is pointed out that on July 31, 2014, in State of Karnataka vs. Centum Industries Limited, (2014) 80 KLJ 65, a Division Bench of this court interpreted section 10(3) of the KVAT Act to mean that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial