Advanced Search Results

Cement Sales Corporation Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 30(3), 39(1) and 69

Reported in : (2009)23VST210(Karn)

to consider the application vide annexure E dated September 4, 2007, filed under Section 69 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, in terms of Section 30(3) and after affording a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner to substantiate the claim,

M/S. Asian Paint Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Tax, and an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 69(1), 63A, ;

rectification orders dated 12.01.201 I and the original order dated 18.12.2010 passed under Section 69(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act for the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2906-2007 passed by the 1st respondent at Annexure A and also to … A1.2. The petitioner-company is incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. 1956 registered under the Karnataka VAT Act of 2003. The Asst. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bangalore undertook assessment for the period 2005-2006 and 2006-2007, concluded the assessment

M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory S. Nagara ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service Tax

the product would fall under one entry or the other, figuring in the notification issued under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 or even under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 2003 which is a mixed question of fact and law. … to declare that the tax levied by the third Respondent by virtue of residuary entry in terms of Section 4 (1) (B) of the KVAT Act, 2003, read with Entry 54, List-II of the Constitution as ultravires … appeals being brought before this Court in the form of the revisions. 69. I do not find any special, exceptional, extraordinary circumstances for the assessee

M/s. Hema Engineering, Bengaluru Vs. The State of Karnataka, Bengaluru

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

re-assessment was permissible under the head of Rectification of the order in purported exercise of the power under Section 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) on the basis of … (Prayer: These petitions are filed under Sec 65 (1) of the Karnataka value added Tax Act, 2003 to revise the order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal Judgment and decree dated 30.12.2015 passed in STA No.2368/2014

M/S Hema Engineering Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

re-assessment was permissible under the head of “Rectification of the order in purported exercise of the power under Section 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) on the basis of a … GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560009 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI.T.K.VEDAMURTHY, AGA) 2 THESE PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER SEC.65(1) OF THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 TO REVISE THE ORDER OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED; 30.12.2015 PASSED IN STA NO.2368/2014

Musthafa vs the Intelligence Officer

Court : Kerala

under Section 47(2) and an amount of Rs.1,33,824/- was demanded as penalty under Section 69(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short 'the KVAT Act'). On coming to know about the detention of the vehicle and the goods,

The State Of Gujarat Vs. Cadila Healthcare Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

It is further submitted by Ms. Jha, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent that even under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “Gujarat VAT Act”), sale and purchase of “poultry feed” are // 14 // exempt … GST Act. The Tribunal upheld the order of the Deputy Commissioner. The respondent preferred a Reference Application under Section 69 of the GST Act before the Tribunal for referring the matter for decision of the High Court. The

Shibu C. Salim Vs. the Intelligence Inspector

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

demand raised on the penalty imposed under Ext.P3 at this point of time. Section 69(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, specifically speaks of a hearing to be given to the registered owner of the vehicle before such penalty

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Represented by Its Chief Manager of Fina ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 62 and 69; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

weeks.2. The petitioner is calling in question the order dated 26.02.2010 passed under Section 69 of the KVAT Act, 2003 in relation to the assessment for the period from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2009 whereby rectification is refused; The said … also on the judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of Pooja Agro Foods v. Commercial Tax Officer (FAC), Avinashi reported in (2007) 5 VST 525 (Mad) to contend that even where there is alternative … Madras High Court in the case of Pooja Agro Foods v. Commercial Tax Officer (FAC), Avinashi reported in (2007) 5 VST 525 (Mad) to contend

Manasa Electricals Co., Vs. State of Karnataka, Financial Secretary an ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals fail and therefore, they are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances, no order as to costs. Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Section 35(4), Section 66(1) Reassessment Tribunal dismissed Appeal and affirmed Order of Revisional Authority whereby Revisional Authority held that