Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: value added tax act 2003 section 66 · Page 1 of about 985 results (0.133 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 2012

M.M. Udyog. Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-2012

Subject : Tax

Acts : Value Added Tax Act 2003 - Section 66, 39(1), 72(2), 36, 64.

under Sec.39(1) Sec.72(2) and Sec.36 and concluding the revisional proceedings and etc.)D.V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.1. These appeals under section 66 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short the Act) are by the dealer who was … (Prayer: These appeals filed U/s. 66(1) of the Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the revision order dated 31.10.2009 passed in ZAC-1/DVO-IV/SMR-67/09-10 on the file of the Addl. Commissioner of Commercial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2016

M/s.3F Industries Ltd., (earlier known as M/s. Foods Fats and Fertilis ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Advance Ruling Authority. 18. In the result, the appeal fails and hence the same is dismissed. Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Section 66(1), Section 4 (b)(iii) Addition of Starch Difference in Product Appellant challenged order passed in Order on file

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2016

Manasa Electricals Co., Vs. State of Karnataka, Financial Secretary an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-17-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

appeals fail and therefore, they are dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances, no order as to costs. Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Section 35(4), Section 66(1) Reassessment Tribunal dismissed Appeal and affirmed Order of Revisional Authority whereby Revisional Authority held that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2010

Sasi Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-05-2010

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 8 and 66(3); ;Finance Act, 2009; ;Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 7 and 43; ;Kerala Value Added Tax Rules - Rule 11(2)

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT661

Rehim, J.1. Challenge in this Writ Petition is against Ext.P6 notice issued under Section 66(3) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act). Through the said notice, the 1st respondent had intimated the petitioner about proposal to revise Ext.P5

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2009

Sri Krishna Spinning and Weaving Mills Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Sri Y. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 60 and 66

Reported in : (2010)27VST194(Karn)

by this common consolidated judgment.3. This and the connected appeal have been preferred under Section 66 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003 (hereinafter for brevity shall be called as 'the Act'), against the order dated 29.09.2005 passed by Authority for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

Maharashtra Agro Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Haryana Local Area Development Tax Act, 2000; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 66, 72 and 72(4); Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Haryana Local Area Development Act, 2000 - Sections 9(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2005)140PLR449

LADT Act. It was also stated that the assessment for the year 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Haryana Local Area Development Act, 2000 are still pending and additional … amount is paid, then in terms of Section 72(4) of the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 read with Section 66 thereof, the attachment and the management of the company taken over by the respondents cannot subsist. On the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2015

Yakult Danone India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Authority for Clarification and Adva ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-30-2015

Subject : Education

be gone into by the Authority constituted for decided the matter. Karnataka value Added Tax Act, 2003 €“ Section 66 (1) €“ Section 60 €“ Section 4 (1) (b) (iii) €“ Sales Tax €“ Milk product €“ Clarification … (Prayer: Appeal is filed under S.66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 against the revision order dated 21.4.2012 in AR CLR 23/2011-12 before the respondent authority.) 1. Appellant is the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2009

Government of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-2009

Subject : ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT

Acts : Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : ILR2009KAR633

Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2009

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Subject : Sales/Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Insecticides Act; Interpretative Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

jurisdiction, alternative remedy may not be a bar - Impugned order set aside - Apeal allowed - KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT (2003) Section 6(1)(d): [S.B. Sinha, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Writ Petition Alternative remedy - Notification No. 82/2006, Dated … 2006, notified the list of goods specified therein to be taxable at the rate of 12.5%. Item No. 66 of the said Notification reads as under:_______________________________________________________Sl.No. Description of Goods HSN Code(1) (2) (3)_______________________________________________________66 Mosquito repellents, electric or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 2006

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Taxes

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-27-2006

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 6, 6(1), 62(1), 43, 67, 74 and 94; Central Excise Tariff Act; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Kerala General Sales Tax Act; Finance Act, 2006; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - Rule 80(1)

Reported in : (2007)6VST390(Ker)

is the petitioner in W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006. Appeal was preferred under Section 62(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 read with Rule 80(1) of the Rules challenging the clarificatory order dated April 7, 2006 passed under SectionCommissioner of Commercial Taxes, Trivandrum. W.P.C. No. 16721 of 2006 was preferred seeking a declaration that serial number 66 inserted as per exhibit P2 notification dated January 21, 2006 is inoperative and unenforceable so far as it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial