Advanced Search Results

Pipe Distributors Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 41 and 41(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Kerala Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 - Rules 10 and 59

Reported in : 2008(1)KLT303; (2007)10VST743(Ker)

corresponding debit note and vice versa and the same is, therefore, contrary to Section 41(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act'). There is also a challenge to the order of assessment passed by

The State of Kerala, vs Pushpangadhan P.,

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

The State of Kerala vs Tulsi Developers India (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

State of Kerala vs Mcp Enterprises

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

The State Tax Officer, vs M/S.Chathamkulam Projects/Developers (P) Ltd ...

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

The Commercial Tax Officer vs T.a.Susilkumar

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax vs Cee Vee Footwear India (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

The State Tax Officer (Works Contract) vs Belma Engineers

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

Assistant Commissioner vs National Paints Factories India (P) Ltd

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that

The Assistant Commissioner (Wc and Lt) vs N.Ayyappan Nair

Court : Kerala

of extra time and work. Sections 20 to 39 of Chapter V and Section 6 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short ‘the VAT Act’) provide for different obligations -107- on the Dealer and the Officers in filing … in paragraph 2.1. AIR 1969 SC 1297(2007) 11 SCC 363(2014) 365 ITR 560 (Bombay)(2015) 1 SCC 11 (2019 416 ITR 613 (SC) -116-5. Mr Mohammed Rafiq, learned Special GovernmentPleader (Taxes), argues that the impugned judgment held that