Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: trusts act 1882 section 93 · Page 1 of about 253 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 2025

Operation Asha versus Shelly Batra & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]8S.C.R.411

Advanced Law Lexicon - referred to. List of Acts Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Trusts Act, 1882; Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. 416 [2025] 8 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports List of Keywords Section … [2025] 8 S.C.R. 411 : 2025 INSC 932 Operation Asha v. Shelly Batra & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 10048 of 2025) 05 August 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala*

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2014

Prasanna Kumar and Another Vs. G.M. Siddeshwar and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-2014

Subject : Election

which his resignation was accepted is at Ex.R23. 75. He submits that Section 71(c) of the Indian Trust Act, 1882 provides for the discharge of the trustee by such means as may be prescribed by the instrument of … C.V.K. RAO v. SRI DANTU BHASKARA RAO reported in AIR 1965 SC 93: œ3¦¦ According to Mr. Chaudhury, it mattered not whether the mine was … The Principal, GMIT is only an employee of the respondent. The GMIT is being run by Srishyla Educational Trust of which the respondent is the Chairman. The Principal is thus an employee of the respondent. The Principal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1997

Henkel Spic India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on : Jan-21-1997

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1997)62ITD66(Mad.)

continued to subsist till the listing process was completed on 6-7-1992. According to section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, where a trustee bound to protect the interest of another person gained for himself a pecuniary advantage, he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 1921

The Advocate-general of Bombay Vs. Yusuf Alli Ebrahim and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-19-1921

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : AIR1921Bom338; 84Ind.Cas.759

49 L.J. Ch. 415 Sir George Jessel said that the beneficiary was entitled to a charge. The Indian Trusts Act, 1882, Section 63, Illustration (b) is to the like effect. But in In re Hallett's Estate (1880) 13 Ch. D. … (1905) 2 Ch. 400 : 74 L.J. Ch. 593 : 54 W.R. 91 : 21 T.L.R. 662 : 93 L.T. 597. In the case cited there was a trust 'for such charitable, educational, or other institutions of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1944

Govind Ram Vs. Madan Gopal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-22-1944

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1945)47BOMLR612

under the Trusts Act, 1882, for the! Act of 1908 is a Consolidation Act and contains a section (Section 93) which provides :(1) The enactments mentioned in the schedule are repealed to the extent specified in the fourth … called the said deed), was exempt from any requirement to be registered, notwithstanding that Section 5 of the Trusts Act, 1882, enacts that no trust in relation to immovable property is valid unless registered.6. The trial Judge decreed the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2018

l.t. Overseas, North America vs.sachdeva and Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2018

Subject : Service Tax

(j) that the position of Ashok Kumar Sachdeva was not of a trustee and the provisions of Indian Trusts Act, 1882, do not apply; (k) that vide Section 94 of the Evidence Act, when language used in a document … companies except Pari Agro Exports, as recorded in the two MOUs; (c) that Ashok Sachdeva group owns over 93% of shares in SSIPL and Vinod Kumar Sachdeva group owns only 0.02% share herein; it is for this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2018

Vinod Kumar Sachdeva & Ors vs.ashok Sachdeva & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-16-2018

Subject : Service Tax

(j) that the position of Ashok Kumar Sachdeva was not of a trustee and the provisions of Indian Trusts Act, 1882, do not apply; (k) that vide Section 94 of the Evidence Act, when language used in a document … companies except Pari Agro Exports, as recorded in the two MOUs; (c) that Ashok Sachdeva group owns over 93% of shares in SSIPL and Vinod Kumar Sachdeva group owns only 0.02% share herein; it is for this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2024

Sree Kapliyangatt Bhagavathi Devaswom Represented by Its Executive Off ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-09-2024

Ramasubbiar v. Manicka Narasimachara[(1979) 2 SCC 65], in the context of Sections 49, 51 and 52 of the Trusts Act, 1882, the Apex Court explained the nature of the fiduci- ary position of the trustee and his duties and … NO.74/2023, SUB COURT, CHAVAKKAD RESPONDENTS’ EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R13(A) TRUE COPY OF CMA 93 OF 2023 DT 17/10/2023 PENDING BEFORE HON'BLE DISTRICT COURT THRISSUR … the fact that the land in question falls under the definition of ‘forest land’ in clause (b) of Section 2 of the Act in respect of which a forest dwelling Scheduled Tribe can seek recognition and vesting

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1966

Rajgopal Raghunathdas Somani Vs. Ramchandra Hajarimal Jhavar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-15-1966

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1967)69BOMLR472; 1967MhLJ799

the confidence of the entire Sampradaya.3. On August. 14, 1950, however, there came into force the Bombay Public Trusts Act, (Act XXIX of 1950), and that Act required that all public trusts must be registered by the trustees … relevant section in the old Code of Civil Procedure (Act XIV of 1882), was Section 539. The separate right of a trustee de hors the … for damages for their wrongful acts as trustees, Such a suit would be clearly within the scope of Section 93 of the Code.He further went on to say :This is not a suit against strangers as contended by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1949

G.F.F. Foulkes and ors. Vs. A.S. Suppan Chettiar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1949

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 20, Rule 13 and 13(2); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 307, 307(1), 323 and 360; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 68 and 93

Reported in : AIR1951Mad296; (1950)2MLJ220

in accordancewith these directions. (i) Property - rendition of account - Section 307 of Succession Act, 1925 and Trusts Act, 1882 - appeal against Order of rendition of account and satisfaction of debts due to creditors of estate in … been in the hands of the executor.'33. These principles we find embodied in the Trusts Act in India. Section 93 of the Actenacts.'Where creditors compound the dabta duo to them, and, one of such creditors by a secret

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial