Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: tramways act 1886 section 9 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2014

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2009

Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 28(4) and 28(6); Mysore Tramways Act, 1906 - Sections 3(5), 4, 5, 7(2), 7(3) and 47A; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Tramways Act, 1886 - Sections 3(5); Constitution of India -Article 372

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3392:2009(4)KCCR2895:2009(6)AIRKarR252.

and Saharanpur and Anr. reported in : AIR 1967 SC 1747). According to Section 3(5) of the Indian Tramways Act, 1886, 'tramways' means a tramway having one, two or more rails and includes any part of tramway or any … and (b) C.T.S. No. 831, B.B.M.P. Khata No. 75/2, Corporation Ward No. 50, V.V. Hiram, Bangalore, East-West measuring 9.90 x 9.90 sq.mtrs. and North-South measuring 12.50 x 12.60 sq.mtrs. The aforesaid two properties are some of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1931

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-1931

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … agent of the company and it bears the common seal of the company. The appellants refer to Article 98(t) of the Articles of Association and argue that the execution-of the mortgage deed is invalid because-under Article 98(t)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 1961

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1961

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

the Harbour, Madras v. Best and Co. ILR 22 Mad 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … Civil Judge overruled the plea of limitation observing as follows: "Ex. A. 9 (the suit notice dated 17-1-1956) seems to have been sent by the … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2023

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-10-2023

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … the aforementioned, it was heldthat the appellant was also eligible to get 9% interest per annum on the total excess amount (50% increased land value … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1967

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-1967

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Tramways Act, 1886; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Government of India Act, 1935; Terminal Tax Rules

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

first respondent, both in this Court and in the High Court. 36. Appeal allowed. Other Taxes - Indian Tramways Act, 1886, Section 135 of Indian Railways Act, 1890, Government of India Act, 1935 and Terminal Tax Rules - respondent imposed … railway, between Shahdara, in Delhi, and Saharanpur, in the State of Uttar Pradesh - a distance of about 95 miles or 148.865 kilo meters. The appellant company also operates within the municipal area of Saharanpur. The company

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1908

Gunnaji Bhavaji Vs. Makanji Khushalchand

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-1908

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1908)10BOMLR969

principles, which have been laid down in several cases, are to be found in Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Company (1886) 16 Q.B.D. 556 and in Weldon v. Neal (1887) 19 Q.B.D. 394; and in Clarapede and … admittedly bad on the face of it, a good one in law. 9. I should like to remark that in this case the plaintiffs cannot … By Section 50 of the Civil Procedure Code, last clause, it is expressly provided: 'If the cause of action arose beyond the period ordinarily allowed by any law for instituting the suit, the plaint must show the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 1945

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-05-1945

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended … was decided that the power given to the Dominion Parliament by Section 91(2), British North America Act, to make laws for the 'regulation' of trade

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1926

Kadiresan Chettiar Vs. Ramanathan Chetti and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-04-1926

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1927Mad478

both his own moneys and his customers. He from time to time, also engages in various other financial activities, which need not be discussed here though traces of them appear in the record. The first test must … of his authority. That is the English Law and it is entirely in consonance with the provisions of Sections 196 and 197 of the Indian Contract Act indeed illustration A of Section 197 expressly covers this case.17. … opinion, the matter will be referred to a third Judge under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Code. The question referred is as follows.20. Whether

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1961

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1961

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

of the Harbour, Madras v. Best & Co. I.L.R.(1899) Mad. 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of … and that there was no survey in respect of the balance of 90 bundles.5. It is under these circumstances that the above appeal and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial