Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … for initial fare fixation, recommendation of Fare Fixation Committee was not necessary. 41. Learned senior counsel for MMRDA then placed reliance on Clause 2.1, 2.2 … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … does not apply to acquisition initiated under the provisions of BDA Act.-. 41 - (i) It is also contended that petitioners herein had filed an … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … the said Act does not apply to acquisition under the BDA Act. 41 33. The same principle is attracted to the present case also. Here … allotment for industrial purposes. That the lands in question and surrounding lands were declared as industrial area under Section 3(1) of the said Act. Preliminary Notification under Section 28(1) of the said Act was issued on 01/12/2009

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 (33 of 1962).-. :77. :- 3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … compensation under the provisions of the Act of 2013.” (underlining by us) 41. Therefore, for a declaration of lapse of acquisition, the pre-conditions or conditions … FOR R-2 & R-3, SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) ***** THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED1604/2018 IN W.P.NO.17432/2014 [LA-BDA]. AND ALLOW THE

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

the Harbour, Madras v. Best and Co. ILR 22 Mad 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and … relinquished under the provisions of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of S. 41-A.(3) The Board shall, if required, take charge of the goods for the

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

of the Harbour, Madras v. Best & Co. I.L.R.(1899) Mad. 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of … relinquished under the provisions of Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 41-A.(3) The Board shall, if required, take charge of the goods for the

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 95(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(3), 19(1), 19(6) and 367; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Sea Customs Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

the. above resolution. 2. The Madras Harbour was constructed in or about 1886. In that year, an Act known as the Harbour Trust Act was … of 1959 is a clearing and shipping agent, carrying on business in Madras and holding a licence for acting as such rom the Collector of Customs at Madras. He is also the secretary of the Madras Clearing … to perform any service which it has relinquished under the provisions of Clause (a) of subsection (1) of Section 41-A (3) The Board shall, if required, take charge of the goods for the purpose of performing the service

Naseera, vs S.a.Sahitha,

Court : Kerala

not when the plaintiffs, suit would bewholly displaced by the proposed amendment (see Steward v. The North Metropolitan Tramways Company [(1886) 16 QBD 178] and a fresh suit by him would be so barred by limitation." One … KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN -671316. 2 FAIZAL. K.M., S/O. LATE SALI HAJEE, AGES 41 YEARS, BEKAL KUNNEL, PALLIKKARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 3 ABDUL NAZER. … 2012 was filed seeking eviction under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The Rent Control Court dismissed the petition. The petitioners carried the matter in appeal and the Appellate … order dated 01.06.2022, the R.C.Rev. was allowed. In this petition filed under Section 114 read withOrder XLVII, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of

In Re: Government of Bombay;

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR1232

is for the best portion of the whole area. This comparatively small portion has a double frontage, with tramways in front, Victoria Gardens near at hand, with frontage shops below and an industrial district all round. And … to which they refer. The first offer was on the 6th November 1886 for 20,000 square yards opposite the great mill on perpetual lease at … Batty, J.1. This is a reference made under Section 19 of the Land Acquisition Act by the Collector of Bombay on application made under Section 18 of that Act.2. It relates to an … reserved for that purpose. Mr. Robertson does not offer objections and thus 410 sq. yds. must be added to area II.48. As I have above

Shantilal Ambalal Mehta Vs. M.A. Rangaswamy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR633; 1977MhLJ587

American Supreme Court in Myers v. Bethlehem Shipped Corporation (1938) 303 U.S. 41 and it is clearly inconsistent with the law declared by the Supreme … of India as it originally stood before the Constitution of India was amended by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, and the one question which now faces not only the litigants and the counsel but also the … provisions in Articles 131A, 226, 226A and 228A of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of Section 58 of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 hereinafter referred to as 'The Amending Act'. These thirteen petitions