Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … Concession Agreement would be applicable and not Section 33 of the Act. 40. In so far as letter dated 07/02/2014 of the Government of India … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … dismissed. BDA has adverted to as many as twentyfour proceedings in - 40 - respect of the land in question and has contended that on … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … Under Section 28(4) and 28(5) of the KIAD Act, such vesting takes 40 place by operation of law and it has nothing to do with … allotment for industrial purposes. That the lands in question and surrounding lands were declared as industrial area under Section 3(1) of the said Act. Preliminary Notification under Section 28(1) of the said Act was issued on 01/12/2009

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 (33 of 1962).-. :77. :- 3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … be a subject matter of acquisition under LA Act, 1984.-. :68. :- 40. Subsequently, the law has been re-stated in the case of Indore Development … FOR R-2 & R-3, SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) ***** THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED1604/2018 IN W.P.NO.17432/2014 [LA-BDA]. AND ALLOW THE

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 25.2.2021 APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT: SHIJI AGED 40 YEARS, D/O VANAJAKUMARY, SHEEBA BHAVAN, KILLI, KOLLODU P.O. KATTAKKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 571. BY … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of

Shahadara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Company Ltd. Vs. Union of I ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1978Cal460

of the claim of the said suit is that the plaintiff was operating a tramway under the Indian Tramways Act, 1886 and/or a light railway under the Indian Railways Act, 1890 between Shahadara (Delhi) Railway Station and Saharanpur. The … be said to be covered by by arbitration clause. 14. It was, lastly, contended that in view of Section 40 of the Government of India Act, 1858 this contract had not been entered into in accordance with the

Mervanji Mancherji Cama Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR654

in which the representation was made or claims under some person so concerned: see Longman v. Bath Electric Tramways, Limited (1905) 1 Ch. 646. The plaintiffs do not claim under the Bank by whom Gostling was employed … certify partial extracts as distinct from exhaustive copies from any portion of the rent roll or register.19. Under Section 40 an 'extract' is something different from a 'copy ' and a ' copy ' can hardly be supposed … kept in pretended compliance with the provisions of Section 39 of Bombay Act II of 1876 and from a notice from the Collector, dated the

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

of the Harbour, Madras v. Best & Co. I.L.R.(1899) Mad. 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … owner of the vessel from which the goods have been?landed or transhipped.Section 40 of the Act postulates the responsibility of the Board for the loss, … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

the Harbour, Madras v. Best and Co. ILR 22 Mad 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … of the vessel from which the goods have been landed or transhipped."Section 40 of the Act postulates the responsibility of the Board for the loss … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 95(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(3), 19(1), 19(6) and 367; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Sea Customs Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

the. above resolution. 2. The Madras Harbour was constructed in or about 1886. In that year, an Act known as the Harbour Trust Act was … the master or the owner of the vessel from which the goods have been landed or transshipped. 3. Section 40 defines the responsibility of the Board for the loss, destruction or deterioration of goods, of which it has … of 1959 is a clearing and shipping agent, carrying on business in Madras and holding a licence for acting as such rom the Collector of Customs at Madras. He is also the secretary of the Madras Clearing