Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: tramways act 1886 section 39 · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2014

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … fare under the Concession Agreement which is approved by the State Government. 39. Mr Bharucha learned senior counsel also placed reliance on Section 103 of … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2009

Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 28(4) and 28(6); Mysore Tramways Act, 1906 - Sections 3(5), 4, 5, 7(2), 7(3) and 47A; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Tramways Act, 1886 - Sections 3(5); Constitution of India -Article 372

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3392:2009(4)KCCR2895:2009(6)AIRKarR252.

and Saharanpur and Anr. reported in : AIR 1967 SC 1747). According to Section 3(5) of the Indian Tramways Act, 1886, 'tramways' means a tramway having one, two or more rails and includes any part of tramway or any … in the case of H.N. Nanje Gowda and Anr. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. 1996 (3) Kar.L.J. 39 has ruled that the setting up of an airport is setting up of an industry and hence, acquisition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1961

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1961

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

of the Harbour, Madras v. Best & Co. I.L.R.(1899) Mad. 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … succession and a common seal, is vested with the duty of carrying out the provisions of the Act. Section 39 prescribing the duties, powers and functions of the Board is in the following terms:39. (1) The Board shall,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 1961

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-26-1961

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

the Harbour, Madras v. Best and Co. ILR 22 Mad 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … duties, powers and functions of the Board is in the following terms." 39 (1) The Board shall, according to its powers provide all reasonable facilities … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2018

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … in question would only nullify the acquisition of the land in question.-. 39 - (f) BDA has further averred that the petitioners have also suppressed … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2020

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 (33 of 1962).-. :77. :- 3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … FOR R-2 & R-3, SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) ***** THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED1604/2018 IN W.P.NO.17432/2014 [LA-BDA]. AND ALLOW THE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2018

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … This judgment categorically holds that once the proceedings are initiated under the 39 KIAD Act, Section 11-A of the old LA Act would not be … allotment for industrial purposes. That the lands in question and surrounding lands were declared as industrial area under Section 3(1) of the said Act. Preliminary Notification under Section 28(1) of the said Act was issued on 01/12/2009

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 1945

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-05-1945

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2009

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2009

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … a matter of right.35. In Tildersley v. Harper (1878) 10 Ch. D 393 which was decided by the English Court even earlier than the Cropper's

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1907

In Re: Government of Bombay;

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-17-1907

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR1232

is for the best portion of the whole area. This comparatively small portion has a double frontage, with tramways in front, Victoria Gardens near at hand, with frontage shops below and an industrial district all round. And … to which they refer. The first offer was on the 6th November 1886 for 20,000 square yards opposite the great mill on perpetual lease at … with the required wages. He took the average of six mills as 39 and counting 24 mills within a radius of a mile of the … Batty, J.1. This is a reference made under Section 19 of the Land Acquisition Act by the Collector of Bombay on application made under Section 18 of that Act.2. It relates to an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial