Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: tramways act 1886 section 38 · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.025 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2014

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … of respondent No.3 company fixing any initial fare by the purported resolution. 38. Mr Bharucha learned senior counsel then submits that even if Section 33 … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2018

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … the BDA dated 16/07/2015 in W.A.No.1490/2009. On the aforesaid pleadings, petitioners - 38 - have sought for a declaration that the acquisition is deemed to … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2020

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 (33 of 1962).-. :77. :- 3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … FOR R-2 & R-3, SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) ***** THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED1604/2018 IN W.P.NO.17432/2014 [LA-BDA]. AND ALLOW THE … entitled to the relief sought for in the writ petition under Section 38C(2) of the BDA Act as amended by the Amended Act, 1999 (Karnataka

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 23 1977

T.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-23-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28

Reported in : [1979]116ITR306(Mad)

procedure for enforcing existing liabilities.'16. In Malabar Petroleum Co. v. Continental Oil Company Ltd. [1963] 2 Com LJ 38 ; [1963] 33 Comp Cas 367, dealing with Section 469 of the CompaniesAct (Act 1 of 1956), it … under the name 'R. R. Pictures', recovery proceedings were taken against her under Section 226(3) of the I.T. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By a notice dated March 6, 1973, the ITO (Administration and Collection),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1912

Mervanji Mancherji Cama Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1912

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR654

in which the representation was made or claims under some person so concerned: see Longman v. Bath Electric Tramways, Limited (1905) 1 Ch. 646. The plaintiffs do not claim under the Bank by whom Gostling was employed … v. Spateman (1670) 1 W. S. 612 and Harrop v. Hirst (1868) 38 L.J. Ex. 1. In England now the question is governed by Order … three certified extracts from rent rolls kept in pretended compliance with the provisions of Section 39 of Bombay Act II of 1876 and from a notice from the Collector, dated the 19th of January 1889, issued under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2009

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2009

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1937

The Central Bank of India Limited Vs. P.D. Shamdasani

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-10-1937

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1938Bom33; (1937)39BOMLR1187

J. goes further and says that the production carries with it the right of inspection.27. In South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v. Ebbsmith [1895] 2 Q.B. 6669 it was held that the jurisdiction to order inspection of entries … is controlled by the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898. See Clauses 28 and 38 of the Amended Letters Patent. See also Empress v. Burah I.L.R. (1878) … the original order to produce, though objection might have been) taken under Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act. But there were protracted arguments as to the relevancy of the documents. The Magistrate held some to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2018

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … of declaration and with effect from non-payment of compensation to the landowners. 38 14. The new Act does not say whether the Act is applicable … allotment for industrial purposes. That the lands in question and surrounding lands were declared as industrial area under Section 3(1) of the said Act. Preliminary Notification under Section 28(1) of the said Act was issued on 01/12/2009

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1974

Challapalli Sugar Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, A.P., Hyder ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-31-1974

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2), 10(5) and 66(1); Indian Income Tax Act, 1886; Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 65; Income-tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 1972; Wealth-tax Act, 1957; Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1972

Reported in : AIR1975SC97; [1975]98ITR167(SC); (1975)3SCC572; [1975]2SCR538

similar purpose can be charged to capital during the period of construction (Hinds v. Buenos Ayres Grand National Tramways Co. Ltd. (1906) 2 Ch. 654). In Higher Book-Keeping & Accounts by Cropper Morris & Fison Seventh Edition, … him under this Act or any Act repealed thereby, or under executive orders issued when the Indian Income-tax Act, 1886 was in force. The definition is subject to provisos, but we are not concerned with them. The explanation … High Court answered the following question on reference made to it under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1924

Emperor Vs. Probhat Chandra Barua

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-08-1924

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1924)ILR51Cal504

shall be assessed oh the annual value of lands and on the annual net profits from mines, quarries, tramways, railways and other immoveable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.'52. I am, therefore, of opinion that … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice--if there … Secretary of State for India (1907) I.L.R. 34 Calc. 257; (19,10) I.L.R. 38 Calc. 372, in the matter of Raj jyoti Prosad Singh Deo (1921) … is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Assam, under Section 66 Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income Tax Act (XI of 1922)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial