Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … parties though provisions of Metro Acts were extended to the Mumbai Metro One. 77. Considering the provisions under Section 36 of the Act of 2002 which provides that Fare Fixation committee shall submit its report along with recommendations

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1962 (33 of 1962).-. :77. :- 3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … fully described in the schedule below in view of lapsing of acquisition in terms of Section 27 r/w Section 36 of the Bangalore Development Authority Act 1976, based on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Offshore

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of … OF INDIA, (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS), PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, TC 36/414(5), KOIKKAL VEEDU, KAVU LANE, PALKULANGARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 024. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR &

Probhat Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1924Cal668

shall be assessed on the annual value of lands and on the annual nett profits from mines, quarries, tramways and other immovable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.70. I am, therefore, of opinion that (i) … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice - … provision under which it is open to us to act is Clause 36 of the Letters Patent of 1865. I have examined the language of … This is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Assam, under Section 66, Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income-Tax Act (XI of 1922) for

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Petition No. 36550 of 2003.3. Brief facts in nutshell are as under:The appellant (original plaintiff)

The Central Bank of India Limited Vs. P.D. Shamdasani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1938Bom33; (1937)39BOMLR1187

J. goes further and says that the production carries with it the right of inspection.27. In South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v. Ebbsmith [1895] 2 Q.B. 6669 it was held that the jurisdiction to order inspection of entries … of the party asking Limited for inspection. In Arnott v. Hayes ) 36 Ch. D 7311887 Cotton L.J. said 737 : 'The examination of the … the original order to produce, though objection might have been) taken under Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act. But there were protracted arguments as to the relevancy of the documents. The Magistrate held some to be

Emperor Vs. Probhat Chandra Barua

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1924)ILR51Cal504

shall be assessed oh the annual value of lands and on the annual net profits from mines, quarries, tramways, railways and other immoveable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.'52. I am, therefore, of opinion that … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice--if there … circumstances, it seems to me that the matter is governed by Clause 36 of the Letters Patent, and that the opinion which I have expressed … is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Assam, under Section 66 Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income Tax Act (XI of 1922)

In Re: Government of Bombay;

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1907)9BOMLR1232

is for the best portion of the whole area. This comparatively small portion has a double frontage, with tramways in front, Victoria Gardens near at hand, with frontage shops below and an industrial district all round. And … to which they refer. The first offer was on the 6th November 1886 for 20,000 square yards opposite the great mill on perpetual lease at … the Privy Council in Ezra v. Secretary of State ILR (1902) Cal. 36 the Collector is an agent for Government for the purposes of determining … Batty, J.1. This is a reference made under Section 19 of the Land Acquisition Act by the Collector of Bombay on application made under Section 18 of that Act.2. It relates to an

A. Rama Rao Vs. Martha Sequeira and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1919)37MLJ224

App Cas 455, London and Brighton Railway Company v. Truman (1886) 11 App Cas 45, West v. Bristol Tramways Company (1908) 2 KB 14 and Westminster Corporation v. London and North Western Railway (1905) App Cas 426. … Aiyar v. The Taluk Board of Mayavaram I.L.R. (1918) M. 331 : 36 M.L.J. 372. We there pointed out that there is a well marked … able and elaborate argument on the question. His main contention was that under Section 207 of the Municipal Act he was bound on the direction of the Municipal Council to put up a latrine, and that otherwise

Kadiresan Chettiar Vs. Ramanathan Chetti and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1927Mad478

both his own moneys and his customers. He from time to time, also engages in various other financial activities, which need not be discussed here though traces of them appear in the record. The first test must … of his authority. That is the English Law and it is entirely in consonance with the provisions of Sections 196 and 197 of the Indian Contract Act indeed illustration A of Section 197 expressly covers this case.17.