Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of … 18/11/ 2013 the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by section 32(1) (a) of the said Act of 1978 added the Metro Alignment of

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … of the LA Act, 1894, with the provisions of the BDA Act.-. 32 - 22. The LA Act, 1894, though a pre-constitution legislation and since … and have decided the matters.3. These writ petitions arise pursuant to issuance of Preliminary Notification dated 19.09.1977 under Section 17(1) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, - 13 - 1976, (hereinafter, referred to as ‘the BDA Act’,

Gunnaji Bhavaji Vs. Makanji Khushalchand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1908)10BOMLR969

principles, which have been laid down in several cases, are to be found in Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Company (1886) 16 Q.B.D. 556 and in Weldon v. Neal (1887) 19 Q.B.D. 394; and in Clarapede and … Q.B.D. 394; and in Clarapede and Co. v. Commercial Union Association (1884) 32 W.R. 262 ; and the facts of the two cases in Steward … By Section 50 of the Civil Procedure Code, last clause, it is expressly provided: 'If the cause of action arose beyond the period ordinarily allowed by any law for instituting the suit, the plaint must show the

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … Ltd. and Anr. v. Ladha Ram & Co. : (1976) 4 SCC 320, the trial court while rejecting an application under Order VI Rule 17

Vasudev Devnath Pandya Vs. Karsan Kamshi Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21, Rules 98, 99 and 103

Reported in : AIR1963Guj153; (1963)0GLR172

393, Clarapede and Co. v. Commercial Union Association, (1883) 32 W. Rule 261 and Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 Q. B. D. 556; but I refrain from citing further authorities, as, in my opinion, … the suit filed by the plaintiff against -the defendant was not governed by Article IIA of the Limitation Act which applied to a suit under Order 21, Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application … both by limitation as well at by virtue of the provisions of Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to him, the proper

Gulam Ahmed Rogay Vs. Bombay Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1951)53BOMLR145

is used in Section 154(1) of the City of Bombay Municipal Act is used in the Parochial Assessments Act, 1886, and it was pointed out by the House of Lords in the case of London County Council v.

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … management have been regular.23. The case of the Royal British Bank v. Turquand [1856] 6 Ellis. & Bl. 327 is one of the most important cases on this point. In that case the directors of the company

T.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28

Reported in : [1979]116ITR306(Mad)

I, at pages 720 and 721 ; and also In re General Horticultural Company: Ex parte White-house [1886] 32 Ch D 512 , Glegg v. Bromley [1912] 3 KB 474 and Sinnott v. Bowden [1912] 2 Ch … under the name 'R. R. Pictures', recovery proceedings were taken against her under Section 226(3) of the I.T. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By a notice dated March 6, 1973, the ITO (Administration and Collection),

Probhat Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1924Cal668

shall be assessed on the annual value of lands and on the annual nett profits from mines, quarries, tramways and other immovable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.70. I am, therefore, of opinion that (i) … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice - … This is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Assam, under Section 66, Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income-Tax Act (XI of 1922) for … In Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Zamindar of Singampatti A.I.R. 1922 Mad. 325, cited by learned Counsel for the Assessee, the sanad and the Regulation

Emperor Vs. Probhat Chandra Barua

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1924)ILR51Cal504

shall be assessed oh the annual value of lands and on the annual net profits from mines, quarries, tramways, railways and other immoveable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.'52. I am, therefore, of opinion that … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice--if there … consolidating Act of 1922. The first Indian Income Tax Act was Act 32 of 1860, which was passed in order to meet the heavy expenditure … is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Assam, under Section 66 Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income Tax Act (XI of 1922)