Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: tramways act 1886 section 31 · Page 1 of about 43 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2014

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … was not as per the fare structure notified by the State Government. 31. By letter dated 06/06/2014 addressed to the respondents, the MMRDA contended that … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Bangalore Metro Rail Corporati ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 03 2025

M/S Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited vs Assistant Labout Commi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Assistant Labour Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2025

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-2025

1890 defines the expression ‘tramway’ under Section 3(1) and it incorporates the definition of ‘tramway’ as defined in Tramways Act, 1886. The definition of ‘tramway’ as - 22 - provided under Section 3(5) of Tramways Act, 1886 does not … WRIT PETITION NO. 40113 OF 2017 (L-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 44263 OF 2017 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 31611 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 52329 OF 2019 (L-RES) WRIT PETITION NO. 197 OF 2020 (L-RES) WRIT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2017

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-14-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … specified in the Section 4 notification become entitled to compensation under the 2013 Act. xxx xxx xxx 14. Section 31(1) of the 1894 Act enjoins upon the Collector, on making an award under Section 11, to tender payment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2020

V.P.Denny vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-08-2020

Sites and Remains Act, 1958;(2) The Atomic Energy Act, 1962;(3) The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948;(4) The Indian Tramways Act, 1886;(5) The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885(6) The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978;(7) The National Highways … the petitioners are entitled to compensation, in accordance with Sections 26 to 31 and Schedules I, II & III of the LARR Act, 2013.C. In … should be strictly construed. By virtue of Exts.P2 and P3, petitioners are entitled for compensation, in accordance with Sections 26, 27, 28, 29 & 30, Schedules I, II, & III of LARR Act, 2013. The Parliament has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 1945

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-05-1945

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … has no application to legislation with respect to anything in entry No. 31. A Provincial Legislature, if it desires to pass a law prohibiting export … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial