Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … was not as per the fare structure notified by the State Government. 31. By letter dated 06/06/2014 addressed to the respondents, the MMRDA contended that … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … specified in the Section 4 notification become entitled to compensation under the 2013 Act. xxx xxx xxx 14. Section 31(1) of the 1894 Act enjoins upon the Collector, on making an award under Section 11, to tender payment

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … under the Sale Deed dated 30.9.1987 to use as a licensee till 31.3.1988;(b) to issue a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to vacate and deliver

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … has no application to legislation with respect to anything in entry No. 31. A Provincial Legislature, if it desires to pass a law prohibiting export … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India Vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

M.R. dealing with legislation by incorporation, in In re. Wood's Estate [(1886) 31 Ch D607 said at p. 615: “If a subsequent Act brings into … Court observed at p. 261: “As a matter of construction it must be held that all works, machinery, tramways and sidings, whether above or below ground, in or adjacent to a coal mine will come within the … Single Judge of the High Court has grossly erred in holding that, in view of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (which came into effect from 7th May 2018), only the offences committed under the Companies 5 Act … and Bankruptcy Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellant-Board’) under Section 236 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as

Vasudev Devnath Pandya Vs. Karsan Kamshi Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21, Rules 98, 99 and 103

Reported in : AIR1963Guj153; (1963)0GLR172

393, Clarapede and Co. v. Commercial Union Association, (1883) 32 W. Rule 261 and Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 Q. B. D. 556; but I refrain from citing further authorities, as, in my opinion, … application in the Darkhast proceedings and was not an application under Order 31, Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order dismissing the … the suit filed by the plaintiff against -the defendant was not governed by Article IIA of the Limitation Act which applied to a suit under Order 21, Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application … both by limitation as well at by virtue of the provisions of Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to him, the proper

Naseera, vs S.a.Sahitha,

Court : Kerala

not when the plaintiffs, suit would bewholly displaced by the proposed amendment (see Steward v. The North Metropolitan Tramways Company [(1886) 16 QBD 178] and a fresh suit by him would be so barred by limitation." One … TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 4 MUHAMMED SHAFEEQUE. K.M., S/O. LATE SALI HAJEE, AGED 31 YEARS, BEKAL KUNNEL, PALLIKKARA VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. 5 RABIYA. K.M., … 2012 was filed seeking eviction under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The Rent Control Court dismissed the petition. The petitioners carried the matter in appeal and the Appellate … order dated 01.06.2022, the R.C.Rev. was allowed. In this petition filed under Section 114 read withOrder XLVII, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of

K.N. Shukla Vs. Navnit Lal Manilal Bhat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 167 and 182; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195, 195(1) and 197

Reported in : AIR1967SC1331; 1967CriLJ1200; (1967)0GLR571; (1967)IILLJ261SC; [1967]2SCR290

which states : 'The existing enactments regulating the construction and operation of railways in India are the Indian Tramways Act of 1886 and the Indian Railways Act of 1890 as amended from time to time. Subject to the … of Mehsana who referred the matter to the High Court on January 31, 1962. In Criminal Reference No. 14 of 1962 the High Court ordered … Operating Superintendent, Western Railway, Rajkot. It was alleged in the complaint that the appellant had committed offences under Sections 166, 167 and 182, Indian Penal Code. The appellant objected before the trying Magistrate that the complaint under

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Tramways Act, 1886; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Government of India Act, 1935; Terminal Tax Rules

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

first respondent, both in this Court and in the High Court. 36. Appeal allowed. Other Taxes - Indian Tramways Act, 1886, Section 135 of Indian Railways Act, 1890, Government of India Act, 1935 and Terminal Tax Rules - respondent imposed … did not differ, in structure and working, from light railways. 16. The expression 'railway' is defined, in s. 311(2) of the Government of Indian Act, 1935, as follows :- ' 'railway' includes a tramway not wholly within

Gulam Ahmed Rogay Vs. Bombay Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1951)53BOMLR145

is used in Section 154(1) of the City of Bombay Municipal Act is used in the Parochial Assessments Act, 1886, and it was pointed out by the House of Lords in the case of London County Council v. … and that is the case of the The Corporation of the Town of Calcutta v. Asutosh De. (1927) 31 C.W.N. 864 The view which was taken in that case was that the Corporation was not entitled to