Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … for withdrawal of agenda item No.5 from the said meeting as untenable. 30. The Board of Directors of respondent No.3 held a meeting on 29th … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 28(4) and 28(6); Mysore Tramways Act, 1906 - Sections 3(5), 4, 5, 7(2), 7(3) and 47A; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Tramways Act, 1886 - Sections 3(5); Constitution of India -Article 372

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3392:2009(4)KCCR2895:2009(6)AIRKarR252.

and Saharanpur and Anr. reported in : AIR 1967 SC 1747). According to Section 3(5) of the Indian Tramways Act, 1886, 'tramways' means a tramway having one, two or more rails and includes any part of tramway or any

Greenlands Ameerpet Madhuranagar Yusufguda Srikrishna Nagar Joint Acti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

run within the municipalities. If it is beyond municipalities, the Parliament alone is competent to legislate. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886, governs the matter. The Parliament enacted the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002. It means that the … air, or by national waterways in mechanically propelled vessels’ occur in item 30 of the same list. The subject “Municipal Tramways” is included in the … He contends that the power to regulate Metro Rails is exclusively conferred upon the Metro Railways administration under Section 6 of the Metro Railways Act, and that the 1st respondent is not at all authorised by such

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … believed to be interested herein to appear before him and state their respective interests in the said land.” Section 30 of KIAD Act states that the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act 1 of 1894)

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … property. The compensation was required to be deposited before the Civil Court to enable determination and apportionment under Section 30 and 31 of the Act. The said award is passed on 27.02.1984. The mahazar for taking possession is

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of … No.55 of 2015 in LAC No.535 of 2013 of the Arbitrator dated 30.1.2018 enhancing the compensation awarded by the competent authority, has been set aside.2.

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … of the scheduled property on the basis of the sale deed dated 30.9.1987. The sale deed was executed by the respondents in favour of the

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India Vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Court observed at p. 261: “As a matter of construction it must be held that all works, machinery, tramways and sidings, whether above or below ground, in or adjacent to a coal mine will come within the … Single Judge of the High Court has grossly erred in holding that, in view of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (which came into effect from 7th May 2018), only the offences committed under the Companies 5 Act … and Bankruptcy Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellant-Board’) under Section 236 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as … under Entry 57 List II of the Seventh Schedule read with Article 301 of the Constitution depends upon the regulatory and compensatory nature of the

Vasudev Devnath Pandya Vs. Karsan Kamshi Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21, Rules 98, 99 and 103

Reported in : AIR1963Guj153; (1963)0GLR172

393, Clarapede and Co. v. Commercial Union Association, (1883) 32 W. Rule 261 and Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 Q. B. D. 556; but I refrain from citing further authorities, as, in my opinion, … have been to make an application under 'Order XXI, Rule 07, within 30 days of the initial resistance to possession made by the respondent, and … the suit filed by the plaintiff against -the defendant was not governed by Article IIA of the Limitation Act which applied to a suit under Order 21, Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application … both by limitation as well at by virtue of the provisions of Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to him, the proper

Naseera, vs S.a.Sahitha,

Court : Kerala

not when the plaintiffs, suit would bewholly displaced by the proposed amendment (see Steward v. The North Metropolitan Tramways Company [(1886) 16 QBD 178] and a fresh suit by him would be so barred by limitation." One … Court in Gireeshbabu T.P. v. Jameela and others [2021 (5) KHC SN 30]. After considering the facts that emerged from the materials on record in … 2012 was filed seeking eviction under Sections 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The Rent Control Court dismissed the petition. The petitioners carried the matter in appeal and the Appellate … order dated 01.06.2022, the R.C.Rev. was allowed. In this petition filed under Section 114 read withOrder XLVII, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of