Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: tramways act 1886 section 28 · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 2009

Zakirunnissa W/O Late Nawab Jan, Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 28(4) and 28(6); Mysore Tramways Act, 1906 - Sections 3(5), 4, 5, 7(2), 7(3) and 47A; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Tramways Act, 1886 - Sections 3(5); Constitution of India -Article 372

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3392:2009(4)KCCR2895:2009(6)AIRKarR252.

and Saharanpur and Anr. reported in : AIR 1967 SC 1747). According to Section 3(5) of the Indian Tramways Act, 1886, 'tramways' means a tramway having one, two or more rails and includes any part of tramway or any … Development Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'KIAD Act' for short), as also the notices issued under Section 28(6) of the KIAD Act vide Annexures-'G-1' and 'G-2' dated 15.5.2008, calling upon the petitioners to hand over the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 2014

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of … area of Mumbai vide notifications dated 16/10/2009. 17. MMRDA by letter dated 28/08/2013 to the said company, recorded that MMRDA vide letter dated 19/03/2012 had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1931

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-1931

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … the undertaking to a company. This application was made before the concession had been granted to him. On 28th June 1921 Mr. Beltie Shah, writing to Mr. Willmott, the Chief Engineer and Secretary to Government in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 10 2023

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-10-2023

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … benefit under Sections 23(1-A) and 2 of erstwhile Land Acquisition Act, 1874 and interest payable in terms of Section 28 proviso thereof, as held admissible to the land owners inrespect of acquisition between 1997 to 2015, as per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2009

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2009

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1912

Mervanji Mancherji Cama Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counci ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-25-1912

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR654

in which the representation was made or claims under some person so concerned: see Longman v. Bath Electric Tramways, Limited (1905) 1 Ch. 646. The plaintiffs do not claim under the Bank by whom Gostling was employed … Indian Act in Shivabhajan v. Secretary of State for India ILR (1904) 28 Bom. 314.15. In answer to the argument based upon Tobin v. Reg … three certified extracts from rent rolls kept in pretended compliance with the provisions of Section 39 of Bombay Act II of 1876 and from a notice from the Collector, dated the 19th of January 1889, issued under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2018

D Sharanappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886). 66 5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction … and surrounding lands were declared as industrial area under Section 3(1) of the said Act. Preliminary Notification under Section 28(1) of the said Act was issued on 01/12/2009 proposing to acquire several lands situated at Harihara Taluk. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2018

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-27-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … W.P.Nos.15967-969/2017 referred to above on 12/04/2017 virtually challenging the acquisition proceedings - 28 - of the years 1982-85 and thereafter, these writ petitions have been … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1940

Maha Ram and anr. Vs. Harbans

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-22-1940

Subject : Property Civil

Reported in : AIR1941All101

of his decree on 28th August 1885. He did not actually prosecute that application and on 5th January 1886 his pleader stated that the case might be struck off the list of pending cases 'for the present.' … which is part of the right of contract. Its existence is recognized in other statutes, for example, in Section 28, Contract Act. The exercise of the right is encouraged as a matter of policy by statute and by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1966

K.N. Shukla Vs. Navnit Lal Manilal Bhat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-1966

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166, 167 and 182; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 195, 195(1) and 197

Reported in : AIR1967SC1331; 1967CriLJ1200; (1967)0GLR571; (1967)IILLJ261SC; [1967]2SCR290

which states : 'The existing enactments regulating the construction and operation of railways in India are the Indian Tramways Act of 1886 and the Indian Railways Act of 1890 as amended from time to time. Subject to the … Thereafter the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Mehsana, by his order dated February 28, 1963, held that the appellant was not removable from his office save … Operating Superintendent, Western Railway, Rajkot. It was alleged in the complaint that the appellant had committed offences under Sections 166, 167 and 182, Indian Penal Code. The appellant objected before the trying Magistrate that the complaint under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial