Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … expeditiously proceed to nominate Government of Maharashtra's representative on the said committee. 25. By letter dated 9/12/2013, the respondent No. 3 company contended that as … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … allowed the company, at the request of their managing agent Mr. Beltie Shah Gilani, an overdraft of Rs. 25,000. The mortgage deed in suit was executed on 19th June 1923 by Mr. Beltie Shah on behalf of

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of … THE ORDER IN OP(ARB) 526/2018 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 25.2.2021 APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT: SHIJI AGED 40 YEARS, D/O VANAJAKUMARY, SHEEBA BHAVAN, KILLI, KOLLODU

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Tramways Act, 1886; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Government of India Act, 1935; Terminal Tax Rules

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

first respondent, both in this Court and in the High Court. 36. Appeal allowed. Other Taxes - Indian Tramways Act, 1886, Section 135 of Indian Railways Act, 1890, Government of India Act, 1935 and Terminal Tax Rules - respondent imposed … Rules, did not meet with success, as the said Magistrate rejected the appeal, by his order dated May 25, 1965. 6. The appellant company filed Civil Miscellaneous Writ No. 3567 of 1965, in the High Court of

Gulam Ahmed Rogay Vs. Bombay Municipality

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1951)53BOMLR145

is used in Section 154(1) of the City of Bombay Municipal Act is used in the Parochial Assessments Act, 1886, and it was pointed out by the House of Lords in the case of London County Council v. … appeal Court in the Poplar Assessment Committee's case, observed in Roberts v. Poplar Assessment Committee [1922] 1 K.B. 25 :There is no material distinction between this definition of rateable value (that given in Section 4 of the

Greenlands Ameerpet Madhuranagar Yusufguda Srikrishna Nagar Joint Acti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

run within the municipalities. If it is beyond municipalities, the Parliament alone is competent to legislate. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886, governs the matter. The Parliament enacted the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002. It means that the … He contends that the power to regulate Metro Rails is exclusively conferred upon the Metro Railways administration under Section 6 of the Metro Railways Act, and that the 1st respondent is not at all authorised by such

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … can be made in pleadings but the effect of substitution of paragraphs 25 and 26 is not making inconsistent and alternative pleadings but it is … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant

R. Sarangapani and anr. Vs. the Port Trust of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 95(4); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13(3), 19(1), 19(6) and 367; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Sea Customs Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1961Mad234; (1961)1MLJ57

led up to the passing of the. above resolution. 2. The Madras Harbour was constructed in or about 1886. In that year, an Act known as the Harbour Trust Act was passed, because it wasconsidered necessary that … prescribed form. Chapter VI (Section 42 etc.) provides for imposition and recovery of rates and Other miscellaneous matters. Section 25 confers on the Board the power to make by-laws not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act or

T.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28

Reported in : [1979]116ITR306(Mad)

of the petitioner in the counter-affidavit, it is stated :The petitioner has admitted in her letter dated January 25, 1974, that a sum of Rs. 4,42,348 is due by her to R. R. Pictures, but according to … under the name 'R. R. Pictures', recovery proceedings were taken against her under Section 226(3) of the I.T. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By a notice dated March 6, 1973, the ITO (Administration and Collection),

Probhat Chandra Barua Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : AIR1924Cal668

shall be assessed on the annual value of lands and on the annual nett profits from mines, quarries, tramways and other immovable property, ascertained respectively as in this Act prescribed.70. I am, therefore, of opinion that (i) … and put aside.6. Some reference was made at the bar to the practice of the Revenue Authorities since 1886 as regards fisheries in permanently settled estates, but there is no agreement as to what that practice - … This is a Reference made by the Commissioner of Income-Tax, Assam, under Section 66, Sub-section (2) of the Indian Income-Tax Act (XI of 1922) for … taxation.' In Manindra Chandra Nandi v. Secretary of State (1907) 34 Cal. 251, royalties from a coal mine were held liable both to cess under