Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Shahdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway Co. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Indian Tramways Act, 1886; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Government of India Act, 1935; Terminal Tax Rules

Reported in : AIR1967SC1747; [1967]3SCR243

tramway, under the Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (Act XI of 1886) (hereinafter called the Tramways Act), on November 20, 1905. By Notification, No. 5752, dated July 5, 1907, the Governor General in Council extended to the appellant … first respondent, both in this Court and in the High Court. 36. Appeal allowed. Other Taxes - Indian Tramways Act, 1886, Section 135 of Indian Railways Act, 1890, Government of India Act, 1935 and Terminal Tax Rules - respondent imposed

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … the defendant's special knowledge. In our opinion there is no force in this reply. Issue 3 at p. 20 implies that the mortgage had not been sanctioned by the Local Government. The plaintiff never alleged that such

Greenlands Ameerpet Madhuranagar Yusufguda Srikrishna Nagar Joint Acti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

run within the municipalities. If it is beyond municipalities, the Parliament alone is competent to legislate. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886, governs the matter. The Parliament enacted the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002. It means that the … He contends that the power to regulate Metro Rails is exclusively conferred upon the Metro Railways administration under Section 6 of the Metro Railways Act, and that the 1st respondent is not at all authorised by such … institutions would also be effected. By referring a report of the year 2003, they submit that the expert agency, which conducted a detailed survey, took

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … and have decided the matters.3. These writ petitions arise pursuant to issuance of Preliminary Notification dated 19.09.1977 under Section 17(1) of the Bangalore Development Authority Act, - 13 - 1976, (hereinafter, referred to as ‘the BDA Act’, … HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION Nos.17852-17856/2014 & 17969/2014 c/w W.P.Nos.17290/2014

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of … THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1945 ARB.A NO. 1 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … Bohla Prasad v. Emperor ('42) 29 A.I.R. 1942 F.C. 17 at p. 20 where their Lordships were considering the scope of the limitations imposed by … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended

The Central Bank of India Limited Vs. P.D. Shamdasani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1938Bom33; (1937)39BOMLR1187

J. goes further and says that the production carries with it the right of inspection.27. In South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v. Ebbsmith [1895] 2 Q.B. 6669 it was held that the jurisdiction to order inspection of entries … 27 and December 22, 1936, were based on elaborate reasons. On February 20, 1937, the complainant filed a revision application in this Court against the … the original order to produce, though objection might have been) taken under Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act. But there were protracted arguments as to the relevancy of the documents. The Magistrate held some to be

T.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28

Reported in : [1979]116ITR306(Mad)

under the name 'R. R. Pictures', recovery proceedings were taken against her under Section 226(3) of the I.T. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By a notice dated March 6, 1973, the ITO (Administration and Collection),