Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of … this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of the board

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … Dehra Dun Mussoorie Electric Tramway Co., Ltd. (in liquidation). This company was incorporated about the end of August 1921 having a registered office at Dehra Dun. The plaintiff's are the proprietors of a bank at Dehra Dun

Greenlands Ameerpet Madhuranagar Yusufguda Srikrishna Nagar Joint Acti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

run within the municipalities. If it is beyond municipalities, the Parliament alone is competent to legislate. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886, governs the matter. The Parliament enacted the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002. It means that the … He contends that the power to regulate Metro Rails is exclusively conferred upon the Metro Railways administration under Section 6 of the Metro Railways Act, and that the 1st respondent is not at all authorised by such … of the Karnataka High Court in W.P.Nos.3345 of 2008 and batch dated 19-03-2010. Layingof Railway Line, of any form, is a stupendous task. The complications

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … ‘the BDA Act’, for the sake of brevity) vide Annexure-C, and declaration and Final Notification dated 07.02.1978 under Section 19(1) of the BDA Act, vide Annexure-D, in respect of Survey No.172/2A of Bilekahalli Village, measuring seven acres. According

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of … C.S. SUDHA MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1945 ARB.A NO. 1 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP(ARB) 526/2018 OF

Gunnaji Bhavaji Vs. Makanji Khushalchand

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1908)10BOMLR969

principles, which have been laid down in several cases, are to be found in Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Company (1886) 16 Q.B.D. 556 and in Weldon v. Neal (1887) 19 Q.B.D. 394; and in Clarapede and … By Section 50 of the Civil Procedure Code, last clause, it is expressly provided: 'If the cause of action arose beyond the period ordinarily allowed by any law for instituting the suit, the plaint must show the

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

393; Arundhati Mishra v. Sri Ram Charitra Pandey : (1994) 2 SCC 2939. In Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 QB 178, the plaintiff filed a suit for damages against the tramways Company for negligence … after obtaining permission from the State of Karnataka under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.5. A petition in public interest was filed by one S. Vasudeva which ultimately came up before this … the first defendant firm applied to the State Government for exemption, under Section 20(1) of the said Act, and sought permission to hold excess vacant … as under:The appellant (original plaintiff) filed an Original Suit No. 2265 of 1996 before the XXXI Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore against the respondents (defendant

Roshan Lal and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1946All161

'prohibit' the movement of or transport. The Court of appeal in England in Reg. v. Croydon and Norwood Tramways Co. (1886) 18 Q.B.D. 39, has also affirmed this principle. In that case Lindley, L.J., observed : 'If … arhar were despatched from Bhitaura railway station. Of these four wagons, it is in evidence, two of them actually arrived at their destination and delivery was actually taken by the consignees. The other two wagons also arrived … vires the powers of the Governor in view of the provisions of Section 297, Constitution Act. The learned Counsel has in the next place contended … validity of the U.P. Food Grains and Oil Seeds (Movement) Control Order, 1943. The applicants in these three revisions are three sets of persons who

The Central Bank of India Limited Vs. P.D. Shamdasani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1938Bom33; (1937)39BOMLR1187

J. goes further and says that the production carries with it the right of inspection.27. In South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v. Ebbsmith [1895] 2 Q.B. 6669 it was held that the jurisdiction to order inspection of entries … the original order to produce, though objection might have been) taken under Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act. But there were protracted arguments as to the relevancy of the documents. The Magistrate held some to be … Sixth Court, rejecting an application made by the petitioner on October 2, 1936, for permission to inspect certain documents which have been produced in Court.

Vasudev Devnath Pandya Vs. Karsan Kamshi Bharwad

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21, Rules 98, 99 and 103

Reported in : AIR1963Guj153; (1963)0GLR172

393, Clarapede and Co. v. Commercial Union Association, (1883) 32 W. Rule 261 and Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886) 16 Q. B. D. 556; but I refrain from citing further authorities, as, in my opinion, … the suit filed by the plaintiff against -the defendant was not governed by Article IIA of the Limitation Act which applied to a suit under Order 21, Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The application … both by limitation as well at by virtue of the provisions of Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. According to him, the proper … for possession against defendant No. I in Civil Suit No. 153 of 1946. The plaintiff thereafter filed Darkhast No. 77 of 1959 to recover possession