Advanced Search Results

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Vs. Reliance Energy L ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

through a concession on public private partnership format and approved the said project under the provisions of Indian Tramways Act 1886. 3. On 21st August 2004, MMRDA invited proposals for selection of a bidder for development and operation of … provision for demand for tolls, fares leviable by MRT administration or concessionaire. 13. On 16/10/2009 by exercising powers under Section 1(3) of the Metro Railways … 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks that the effect, implementation and/or operation of

Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jagmandar Da ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1932All141

for determination. The first question is whether the company was a 'promoter' within the meaning of the Indian Tramways Act 1886, and the Tramway order of 1921 made under Sub-section (3), Section 6 of that Act by the Local … a mere bogus resolution. He relies mainly on the letters Ex. Q and Ex. CC. Ex Q (p. 135) is a letter from Mr. Beltie Shah to the plaintiff dated 12th June 1923 Mr. Beltie Shah complains

Greenlands Ameerpet Madhuranagar Yusufguda Srikrishna Nagar Joint Acti ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

run within the municipalities. If it is beyond municipalities, the Parliament alone is competent to legislate. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886, governs the matter. The Parliament enacted the Metro Railways (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002. It means that the … He contends that the power to regulate Metro Rails is exclusively conferred upon the Metro Railways administration under Section 6 of the Metro Railways Act, and that the 1st respondent is not at all authorised by such

Shiji vs the Project Director

Court : Kerala

Atomic Energy Act, 1962 (33 of 1962).3. The Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 (14 of 1948).4. The Indian Tramways Act, 1886 (11 of 1886).5. The Land Acquisition (Mines) Act, 1885 (18 of 1885).6. The Metro Railways (Construction of Works) … to be given to those, whose land is acquired and Fourth scheduleincludes 13 Acts to which provisions of 2013 Act would not be applicable.19. Section … a bye- pass to avoid the Kazhakkuttam-Karode stretch of the NH 47 in Thiruvananthapuram city.3. Declaration under Sub Section 1 of Section 3D of the National Highways Act was approved and published in the official Gazette of

T.R. Rajakumari Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 226(3) - Schedule - Rule 28

Reported in : [1979]116ITR306(Mad)

Therefore, under the bona fide belief that there was no need to reply, she remained silent. On November 13, 1973, the ITO, Central Circle XIII, Madras, sent a letter to the petitioner stating that since no reply … under the name 'R. R. Pictures', recovery proceedings were taken against her under Section 226(3) of the I.T. Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). By a notice dated March 6, 1973, the ITO (Administration and Collection),

Revajeetu Builders and Developers Vs. Narayanaswamy and Sons and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 20(1); Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999; Contract Act - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21 Rule 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1882 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

Matched in: Citation 2009(4)AWC4002(SC); JT2009(13)SC366; (2009)8MLJ907(SC); 2009(II)OLR(SC)815; RLW2010(1)SC322; (2009)10SCC84; 2009(10)LC4850(SC):2009AIRSCW6644; [2009] 15 SCR 103; MANU/SC/1724/2009

Kadiresan Chettiar Vs. Ramanathan Chetti and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1927Mad478

both his own moneys and his customers. He from time to time, also engages in various other financial activities, which need not be discussed here though traces of them appear in the record. The first test must … of his authority. That is the English Law and it is entirely in consonance with the provisions of Sections 196 and 197 of the Indian Contract Act indeed illustration A of Section 197 expressly covers this case.17. … 1925, It reaches us in the form of a judgment divided into 130 numbered paragraphs covering 67 closely printed foolscap pages accompanied by a documentary

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Company, a Partnership Fir ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1962)2MLJ29

of the Harbour, Madras v. Best & Co. I.L.R.(1899) Mad. 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … demur to the maintainability of the suit and contend that the suit claim is barred by limitation under Section 110 of the Madras Port Trust Act, 1905.4. The learned City Civil Court Judge overruled the plea of

The Madras Port Trust Vs. A.M. Safiulla and Co. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Madras Port Trust Act, 1905 - Sections 6, 39(2), 41-A(1), 110 and 111; Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1885 - Sections 87; Madras Harbour Trust (Amendment) Act, 1886; Madras Harbour Dues Act, 1882; Indian Railways Act, 1890; Public Authorities Protection Ordinance - Sections 2; Calcutta Port Trust Act - Sections 142; Madras General Clauses Act - Sections 3(22)

Reported in : AIR1965Mad133

the Harbour, Madras v. Best and Co. ILR 22 Mad 524 which arose under the Madras Harbour Trust Act, 1886 (Act II of 1886). The suit in that case was to recover a balance of coal alleged to … finding of the learned Judge is extremely unsatisfactory and we must observe that the failed to read the section properly observe that he failed to read the section properly and of course completely misunderstood its scope and

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India Vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Court observed at p. 261: “As a matter of construction it must be held that all works, machinery, tramways and sidings, whether above or below ground, in or adjacent to a coal mine will come within the … (“MRTP Act, 1969” for short) provided that any person aggrieved by an order made by the Commission under Section 13 may prefer an appeal to the Supreme Court on ‘one or more of the grounds specified in Section