Advanced Search Results

R.K. Saraf Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 57(4), 83 and 91; Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958 - Sections 25, 25(3), 25(4) and 26; Trade Marks Rules - Rule 69; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(36)PTC520(Del)

i.e. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks issued a show cause notice under Section 57(4) was of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 asking the Petitioner to disclose why the entry with the Trade Mark should not be recalled/struck off of … Assistant Registrar of the kind which has been impugned, are appealable to the Appellate Board., in terms of Section 91. The Appellate Board has been established under Section 83 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.12. I am of

Koxan India Vs. Ramesh Mardia and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 91; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(40)PTC72(Del)

registration accrue to Mr Ramesh Mardia. The proper remedy would be an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.14. The aforesaid discussion clearly emphasises the point that the entire case turns on the question of whether the

M/S. Shreedhar Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikas Tyagi and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Education

that Rule 15 of IPAB procedures Rules relates to the intervention by third party, in appeals filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and therefore, allowing intervention by third parties is contrary to the provisions … in that particular case. But, whatever we decide, it would apply, not only to the proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but also to proceedings under the Patent Act, 1970 and under Geographical Indications Act, or under any other

K. Dhamodaraswamy Naidu and Bros Vs. the Registrar of Trademarks

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

the Registrar under the Act and, therefore, the appeal is not maintainable under section 91 of the Act. Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 91, Section 91(1)

R.S.Champalal Vijaychand Sariya (Huf) Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : MRTP

Registrar may dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 91

M/S. Aligarh Lock House Vs. Mr. Tilak Raj Hora and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

with law after proper notices given to the parties. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 91 of the

M/S. Betco Enterprises-a Registered Partnership Firm, Represented by I ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

above, we overrule the objection raised by the Registry and direct them to take the appeal on record. Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 91

Kendro Laboratory Products Gmbh, a German Company Vs. the Deputy Regis ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : MRTP

Honble Shri Z.S. Negi, Chairman: This is an appeal under section 91 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) directed against the order dated 19.02.2008 passed by the Deputy Registrar of

Embiotic Laboratories Private Limited Vs. Lincoln Pharmaceuticals Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Right to Information

the appeal and process the same in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 91, Sub-section (1) Limitation Act, Section 5

Bayer Ag a German Company Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade M ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

Honble Z.S. Negi, Chairman: The appellant has filed the above appeal under section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 14.2.2008 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Trade