Advanced Search Results

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

19 AND THAT IT IS NOT SAVED BY ARTICLE304OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND IS CONTRARY TO THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 AND/OR THE LEGAL METROLOGY (PACKAGED COMMODITES) RULES, 2011, & ETC. WRIT PETITION NO.35717/2016 IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 … including pictorial warnings, production, supply or distribution of cigarettes or any other tobacco products, is prohibited as per Section 7(1). Even carrying on of trade or commerce in cigarettes and other tobacco products is also prohibited, unless … Interest Litigation petitions pending for implementation of the said Rules. In view 75 of that, we would also request the Chief Justice of the Karnataka

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.1mg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the products were genuine, the Defendants do not qualify to claim the defence of Section 30 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.18. It is, further, stated that the sale of Amway products on an e- commerce platform and the mobile … ADINATH ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Garima CS (OS) 410/2018, 453/2018, 480/2018, 531/2018, 550/2018, 75/2019 & 91/2019 Page 1 of 225 Sehgal and Mr. Vishwajeet Arora, Advocates for D-2 & 3. Mr. Prateek

Nico Quality Products Vs. Nc Arya Snuff Cigar Company

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

K.K.and others].15.The learned senior counsel for the applicant/plaintiff, by relying upon Sections 37, 38 & 39 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, has submitted that the registration of trademark shall be assignable and transmissible with or without the goodwill of … caused the present suit in active collusion with the other partner of the applicant-company viz., C.Vijay. 7(d)Further, under Section 45 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, any assignment of the registered trademark without the goodwill of the business

The Chartered Institute of Taxation vs.institute of Chartered Tax Advi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Vasant Kung, New Delhi-110070, etc. within the territorial jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.” 2. Section 142 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, invoking which the suit has been filed, is as under: “142. Groundless threats of legal proceedings.- (1) Where … restrained from extending / continuing the groundless threats of infringement and passing off”; and, (xxiii) paragraph 74 and 75 of the plaint are as under: “74. That the immediate concerns and cause of action for filing the

Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Vs. Tosiba Appliances Co.

Court : Trademark

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(30)PTC188Reg

the Trade & Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Rules framed thereunder read with the relevant provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Rules framed thereunder on the following grounds:- (1) That the said trade mark TOSHIBA was wrongly registered … the entry of the mark was made without sufficient cause. (2) That the trade mark was registered under Section 9 of the Act by committing fraud and misrepresenting and suppressing the facts. (3) That the registration of

Verizon Trademark Services Llc & Ors vs.mr Parth Solanki & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

India as well globally. In India, the plaintiffs have secured registrations in, inter alia, class 42 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 with respect to web-hosting and web-development related services.8. It is stated in the plaint that the plaintiffs’ trademark … an order of declaration, declaring the Plaintiffs‟ trademark VERIZON and the VERIZON Logos as “well-known” the meaning of Section 2(1) (zg) read with Section 11(6) of the Trademarks Act, 1999; trademarks within (iii) An order for the

M/S. Shreedhar Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikas Tyagi and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Education

in that particular case. But, whatever we decide, it would apply, not only to the proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but also to proceedings under the Patent Act, 1970 and under Geographical Indications Act, or under any other … has filed proof of affidavit. 35. In C.P.C. we find Part III deals with Incidental Proceedings and specifically Section 75 deals with power to issue commission and Section 75 (e) for the purpose of scientific, technical or expert

Kobian Pte Limited Vs. Kobian India Private Limited,

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)126CompCas675

"MERCURY", especially when the Company had applied for registration of the trade mark under Indian law with the Trade marks authorities as early as on 07.03.2000, much prior to the application made by the petitioner on 22.07.2003 before … petition is filed under Sections 397 and 398 read with Sections 111, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 ("the Act") alleging that the affairs of M/s Kobian India Private Limited ("the Company") are being conducted … 1. This petition is filed under Sections 397 and 398 read with Sections 111, 402 and 403 of the … 03.05.2004 is hull and void; (c) to order for the forfeiture of 75,750 (Seventy Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty) shares of Rs. 10/- (Rupees Ten

Pidilite Industries Limited Vs. Jubilant Agri and Consumer Products Li ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

common, customary term, generic, laudatory or non-distinctive mark within the meaning of Section 9 (c ) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (œthe Act?) in relation to œwaterproof adhesives? cannot be accepted. The Plaintiff is correct in its contention that … Products Refining Co. vs. Shangrila Food Products Ltd.;(AIR 1960 SC 142); F.D. Diesel vs. S.M. Diesel (1994 PTC 75); Ultratech Cement Ltd. vs. Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd.(supra); Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd. and another vs. Mohan Rocky

Walter Bushnel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mankind Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

Matched in: Judge K.N. Basha, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Mr. V. Ravi, Technical Member (Trade Marks)