Advanced Search Results
Glaxo Smith Kline Asia P. Ltd. Vs.assess. Auth. Special Zone Trade
Delhi
May-17-2017
Service Tax
Datar, learned senior counsel lastly relied on Section 48 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (“the Trade Marks Act” hereafter) and argued that use of the mark by a permitted user is not considered to be grant … judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as Commissioner of Sales Tax v Duke and Sons P. Ltd 1999 (112) STC320 where it was held that: “There is a distinction between transfer of right to use a … royalty are subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Sections 65 (47) and 65 (48) of the said Act read as follows: “(47)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMc Donalds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of T&t
Delhi
May-17-2017
Service Tax
Datar, learned senior counsel lastly relied on Section 48 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (“the Trade Marks Act” hereafter) and argued that use of the mark by a permitted user is not considered to be grant … judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as Commissioner of Sales Tax v Duke and Sons P. Ltd 1999 (112) STC320 where it was held that: “There is a distinction between transfer of right to use a … royalty are subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Sections 65 (47) and 65 (48) of the said Act read as follows: “(47)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBikanerwala Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Delhi
May-17-2017
Service Tax
Datar, learned senior counsel lastly relied on Section 48 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (“the Trade Marks Act” hereafter) and argued that use of the mark by a permitted user is not considered to be grant … judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as Commissioner of Sales Tax v Duke and Sons P. Ltd 1999 (112) STC320 where it was held that: “There is a distinction between transfer of right to use a … royalty are subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Sections 65 (47) and 65 (48) of the said Act read as follows: “(47)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
McDonalds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes
Delhi
May-17-2017
Service Tax
Datar, learned senior counsel lastly relied on Section 48 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (“the Trade Marks Act” hereafter) and argued that use of the mark by a permitted user is not considered to be grant … judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as Commissioner of Sales Tax v Duke and Sons P. Ltd 1999 (112) STC320 where it was held that: “There is a distinction between transfer of right to use a … royalty are subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Sections 65 (47) and 65 (48) of the said Act read as follows: “(47)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSagar Ratna Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.vto (Ward 205) and Ors.
Delhi
May-17-2017
Service Tax
Datar, learned senior counsel lastly relied on Section 48 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (“the Trade Marks Act” hereafter) and argued that use of the mark by a permitted user is not considered to be grant … judgment of the Bombay High Court reported as Commissioner of Sales Tax v Duke and Sons P. Ltd 1999 (112) STC320 where it was held that: “There is a distinction between transfer of right to use a … royalty are subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Sections 65 (47) and 65 (48) of the said Act read as follows: “(47)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Eris Life Science Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad Vs. M/s. Micro Labs Ltd. B ...
Chennai
Jan-11-2017
Intellectual Property
Delhi has held as follows: .. .. Keeping in view the pendency of the rectification proceedings to the trade marks relied upon in the suit by the plaintiff, this is not a fit case for the grant of … view that the suit has to be stayed. Accordingly, the suit in C.S.No.426 of 2013 is stayed. Trademarks Act, 1999 Section 13, Section 124 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 151 Stay of proceedings Applicant/original Respondent sought to stay … PTC-260 (S.Karam Singh v. Master Machine and Service and others) ; 2016 65 CTC 209 Delhi (Data Infosys Ltd., Ors., v. Infosys Technologies Ltd.,) and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeshwar Prasad @ Pappuji Singh Chand Sigh and Another Vs. Prem Mehan ...
Mumbai
Oct-19-2016
Intellectual Property
name KAVERI for his products since the year 2007. The plaintiff got his trade mark registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The plaintiff's mark and label of Kaveri Mehandi Cone is registered vide registered no.1636298 dated 31st December, 2007. … and sections 103 and 104 of Trade Marks Act, and sections 64, 65 of the Copyright Act on 21st April, 2012. The police station accordingly … public. The plaintiff therefore filed FIR vide Cr.No.54 of 2012 with the Khajekala Police Station, Patna City under sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 473, 474, 482, 483, 485, 487 of I.P.C. and sections 103 and 104 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSap Se & Ors vs.sap Edge
Delhi
Aug-22-2017
Intellectual Property
SAP mark and SAP logo have acquired reputation and goodwill in the marks globally as well as in India. CS (OS) 599/2015 Page 7 of … plaintiff‟s mark SAP and SAP label is registered under Classes 9, 16, 14 and 42 under the Trademark Act, 1999. It is contended that the plaintiff provides various business solutions to its customers which are collectively called as … August, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (oral): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts, damages and delivery up etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced … MM. The aforesaid software programmes are computer programmes within the meaning of Section 2(ffc) of the Copyright Act 1957 and are included in the definition … has today handed over an affidavit under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, 1872 in which it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Hero Honda Motors Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-12-2012
MRTP
and unequivocally that ‘Indian Law’ means only Indian Legislations and not the common law as such.. (ii). The Trade Marks Act, 1999 only governs and regulates registered trade marks and not unregistered trade marks which are not governed by any … plus; (2) The said trade marks falls within the ambit of the definition of intellectual property right’ under Section 65 (55)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994 (herein after referred to as the Act); (3) Hero Honda has provided
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Az Tech (India) & Anr. Vs.m/s Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. ...
Delhi
Dec-24-2016
MRTP
has represented before the Trade Marks Registry in India. This is in violation of Section 24 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and suppression of the Agreement dated 22.03.2009 from the Registry. b. Similar deception has been played upon the … in Karol Bagh, Delhi and all are computer generated invoices. Further, out of 72 invoices placed on record, 65 invoices depict cash transactions which make no reference to the buyer. Even in respect of the buyers mentioned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »