Advanced Search Results

Dabur India Limited Vs. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 28 and 29(8); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - Sections 36A

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi102; 114(2004)DLT373; 2004(77)DRJ415; 2004(29)PTC401(Del)

Intellectual Property Rights - passing off - Sections 28 and 29 (8) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 36A of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act - application seeking stay of advertisement - advertisement pertaining to ill … violation of the Intellectual Property Rights of the plaintiff.(c) In any event Section 29(8)(a) & (c) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) does not permit the infringement of a registered trade mark such as

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

6 kgs of Charas from him. Prior to that, he was working as a commission agent in walnut trade and in that connection had met accused No.2 Gurdev Singh Vora in 1999. He has then stated that … the Special Court ought to have exercised the powers of a Magistrate. For that, reliance is placed on section 36A of NDPS Act. It was submitted that the charge should have been framed keeping in mind provisions of … well as employees of Accused No.2. The officers recovered two stripped nylon market bags. After opening the first bag, two large khaki envelopes containing one

C.Dasarathan Vs. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C (2), 10

Taking advantage of the same, some of the superior officers of the company, who were unhappy with the trade union activities of the petitioner, had caused the issuance of a charge memo against the petitioner, dated 7.1.1998.3. … superior officers of the company, who were unhappy with the trade union activities of the petitioner, had caused the issuance of a charge memo against … outside the purview of Section 33C(2) because interpretation of awards or settlements has been expressly provided for by Section 36A. This objection was rejected. This Court pointed out the difference in the scope of Section 36A and Section … The plaint filed by the petitioner before the civil court had been marked as Exhibit R.8, on the file of the fourth respondent labour Court.

M/s. Classic Engineering Co. and Others Vs. The Commissioner of Sales ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

dealers to strike out those portions of the above Forms which are not applicablein terms of the asterisk marks given in the Form while giving the declaration in the above Form after 30th September 1999. This submission, … sale in the manner specified in item (A) of Section 4(2)(a)(v);(ii) for sale in the course of inter-state trade or commerce or in the course of exports outside India in the manner specified in sub-items (2) or … are nine appeals under Section 81 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 ( ˜DVAT Act') filed against a common majority order dated 19th

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

suspending its growth by doubting its constitutional efficacy at the threshold itself.‖ (emphasis supplied) In DG of Foreign Trade v. Kanak Exports, (2016) 2 SCC226 this Court has held: that it cannot be denied ―109. Therefore, the … and to improve recovery processes. reduce to The setting up of IUs marks a shift in the above position as not only is the information … or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2017 made under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999); (d) an asset company registered with the Reserve Bank of India under Section 3 of … the Schedule before issue of invitation for expression of interest under Regulation 36A. (2) The application in sub-regulation (1) shall be accompanied by a bank