Advanced Search Results

Shri Amarjeet Singh and Another Vs. M/S. Sardar Food Products and Othe ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : MRTP

Obaidur Rahaman, Technical Member: The Respondent No.3 has filed the above mentioned Miscellaneous Petition under section 92 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking permission of the Honble Appellate Board to take his evidence by way of affidavit filed on 04.02.09

M/S. Shreedhar Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Vikas Tyagi and Another

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Education

in that particular case. But, whatever we decide, it would apply, not only to the proceedings under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but also to proceedings under the Patent Act, 1970 and under Geographical Indications Act, or under any other … UNION OF INDIA, and OTHERS (2009 (39) PTC 627; AIR 1970 SC 150) the Honble Supreme Court held that the aim of the rules of … was filed on the question whether the Appellate Board has power to refer the matter to Full Bench. Section 83 gives the Appellate Board jurisdiction power and authority, which shall be exercised by the IPAB in accordance

M/S. Sony Kabushiki Kaisa Also Trading as Sony Corporation Vs. Purusho ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Ms. S. Usha, Vice Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Mr. V. Ravi, Technical Member (Trade Marks)

Sanofi Aventis vs Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

mark CLAVIX does not infringe the plaintiff’s registered mark PLAVIX, as a result of Section 17 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999? OPD5. Whether the defendant is the prior and/ or bona fide user of the mark CLAVIX for medicinal … goodwill and reputation of the product in the Indian market at the relevant point of2017 SCC OnLine SC 1500 MISHRA CS(COMM) 120/2016 Page 44 of 64time, particularly having regard to the limited online exposure at that point

Nakoda Dairy (P) Ltd. Rep by Its Director Mr. D. Navrathan Vs. Kewal C ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 34, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 124 and 124(1); Copyrights Act; Central Sales Tax Act

Reported in : 2009(40)PTC428(Mad)

The proceedings of the suit is liable to be stayed by this Court under Section 124(1)(b)(i) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The plaintiff filed a suit in O.S. No. 8240 of 2007 before the Principal City Civil cum Sessions … entered in the register of Trade Marks as a proprietor of the impugned trade mark No. 214129 in Cl.9 from October 22, 1988 onwards. The said matter is still sub judice and no order thereon has so

Societe Des Produits Nestle, S.a and anr. Vs. Montu Sadhu and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

plaintiff No.1 has a statutory right of exclusive use thereof under the provision of Section 28(1) of The Trade Marks Act, 1999, (hereinafter referred to as “ the Act”) including having right to obtain relief against infringement thereof.13. It has … fact that for the year 2002 alone, the sales of KITKAT wafer bars by the Company amounted to 150,000 tons for a Net Profit of Sales of 1 billion Swiss Francs. Yearly worldwide consumption of KITKAT wafer

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

19 AND THAT IT IS NOT SAVED BY ARTICLE304OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND IS CONTRARY TO THE TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 AND/OR THE LEGAL METROLOGY (PACKAGED COMMODITES) RULES, 2011, & ETC. WRIT PETITION NO.35717/2016 IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 … including pictorial warnings, production, supply or distribution of cigarettes or any other tobacco products, is prohibited as per Section 7(1). Even carrying on of trade or commerce in cigarettes and other tobacco products is also prohibited, unless … report recommended size of 80% on the front and back panel, the 150 Health Ministry prescribed 85% on the front and back panel. This disclosed

Kores (India) Limited Vs. Whale Stationery Products Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 1(2), 2, 28, 28(1), 29 and 34; Indian Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 33 and 46

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR276; 2008(3)MhLj523; LC2008(1)155; 2008(36)PTC463(Bom)

the Court on the application for interim relief, it is necessary to advert to the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Under Section 28(1) of the Act, the registration of a mark entitles the registered proprietor to the exclusive … EXPENSESSr. No. Year Amount (Rs. in lakh) 1 200001 122.47 2 200002 206.58 3 200203 182.27 4 200304 150.96 5 200405 354.65 6 200506 442.72 3. The sales figures of the Plaintiff reflect a revenue of Rs.

Eaton Corporation and anr. Vs. Bch Electric Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

an exclusive right on the plaintiffs to the use of the said trademarks under Section 28 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The use of any mark which may be identical and/or deceptively similar thereto in respect of the same … more than 100 years, employing approximately 73,000 employees worldwide and selling its products to customers in more than 150 countries. During the year 2010, their market value is estimated to be $19.92 billion USD approx.5. It is

Jolen Inc., Rep. by Its Constituted Attorney, Mr. A. Arulselvan Vs. Mr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 11; Copyright Act - Sections 40

Reported in : (2004)3MLJ176; 2005(30)PTC385(Mad)

Paris Convention, an internationally well reputed trademark ought to be protected in India and section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 also provides for the protection of internationally well reputed trademarks. It is stated that the distinctive script with … Road, Chennai-18, (f) Five Stars, 53/2, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai-86, (g) Angels, Shop No.14 and 29, Olsons Complex, 150, Montieth Road, Chennai-8, (h) Tikamchand and Ghanaram, Shop No.29, New Hong Kong Bazaar, Thribhuvan Talkies Basements, Gandhi Nagar,