Advanced Search Results

Shri Venkateshvara Logistics Vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in Writ Tax No.799/2017. He also relied upon the judgment in Jaspreet Kalra Vs. Union of India by the Uttarakhand High Court in (2019) 87 ITPJ (G) 570. He also relied upon the judgment of the Karnataka High … the impugned proceedings for the detention of the goods conveyance vehicle No.HR55AF7882second time by issue of order in GST MOV2dated 10.03.2019 by the respondent, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, … of detention in Form GST MOV-06 (Annexure-B1) dated 07.03.2019. A notice under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act in Form GST MOV No.7 (Annexure- B2) … The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (henceforth referred to as ‘CGST Act’) and Integrated Goods and Services

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

and only thereafter, had commenced to charge entertainment tax on 'Direct-to-Home' (DTH) service. It was pointed out, that the Uttarakhand Legislature had not carried out any such amendments in the Entertainment Act, 1979, so as to include 'Direct-to-Home' … element is involved in the transaction providing telephone services. Yet in paragraph 87 the Court opined as under:87. It is not possible for this Court … State subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament.54. Taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers, subject to the provisions of entry 92A of List I.A perusal of the aforesaid entries … office at Bombay. The petitioner company was granted a statutory licence under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act,

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2008)17VST18(NULL)

as referred to in the notification dated February 21, 1997.5. After creation of new State of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand), the State Government has adopted the Act and the word 'Uttaranchal' has been substituted in place of Uttar … a period of 15 years with effect from November 8, 1998 to November 7, 2013.17. By virtue of Section 87 of the U.P. Re-organisation Act, 2000, all enactments, the Acts, Rules and notifications which were enforced in the … sales made by the petitioner within the State of Uttaranchal of the goods manufactured in its new unit for which the eligibility certificate has been

K.A. Radha Vs. The Kasaragod District Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Kasarago ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

B.J.Akkara (Retd.) v. Govt. of India ((2006) 11 SCC 709), Chandi Prasad Uniyal and Others v. State of Uttarakhand and Others ((2012) 8 SCC 417)and Registrar, Co-operative Societies Haryana and Others v. Israil Khan and Others ((2010) … Exhibit P10 representation yielded no result, she finally filed Exhibit P11 revision before the third respondent by invoking Section 87 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 (the 'Act for brevity). 9. Initially, the third respondent issued stay … Bank on 29.04.1989 as a Steno-cum-Typist, and later, on 20.01.1991, had her services regularized with effect from 13.05.1990. Soon thereafter, on 20.11.1991, the petitioner was

Lombardi Engineering Limited Vs. Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

business of operating hydro power plants in the State of Uttarakhand.4. The petitioner entered into a contract with the Uttarakhand Project Development and Construction Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “UPDCC”) for “Providing consultancy services and preparation of … ignore the two conditions contained in Clause 55 of the GCC, one 87 relating to 7% deposit of the total amount claimed and the second … and Construction Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as “UPDCC”) for “Providing consultancy services and preparation of modified comprehensive and bankable Detailed Project Report of Arakot … 8 SCC520 88. In the aforesaid context, we must look into the amended Section 12 of the 1996 Act. Section 12 reads thus: “12. Grounds for challenge. (1) When a person is approached in connection with his possible

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil Vs. The Chief Minister And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

has appeared for the State of Karnataka. Shri Vinay Arora, learned counsel, has appeared for the State of Uttarakhand. Shri Arun Bhardwaj, learned counsel, has appeared for the State of Haryana. Shri Amit Kumar, learned counsel, has … developed States in the country which has highest share in the country's GST i.e. 16%, higher share in Direct Taxes-38% and higher contribution to country's … These issues having never been addressed before this Court in Indra Sawhney’s 87 case, the matter needs to be referred to a larger Bench.96. The … and Central Government posts. Shri Singhvi has also referred to 1993 Act and submits that in the said Act Section 2(C) referred to a list which was only a Central list. Article 342A(2) uses 91 the same Central

Odisha State Financial Corporation versus Vigyan Chemical Industries a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.1

Civil Appeal No. 10047 of 2025 From the Judgment and Order dated 22.11.2022 of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in WPMS No. 2314 of 2022 Appearances for Parties Advs. for the Appellant: Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, … 64 : (1991) 4 SCC 139 : (1992) 87 STC 289 : 1991 SCC OnLine SC 17; … 23.09.1992 - Further, it is the buyer who is liable to make the payment after the supply of goods or rendering any service - Thus, by virtue of s.3, both the incidents-i.e., the supply of goods or … to modify the decree by entertaining an application u/s.21 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and (iv) the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to … liability of the appellant is limited strictly to the extent contemplated under Section 29 of the S.F.C. Act, 1951 - The appellant therefore, cannot be

Assotech Super Tech (J.V.) Through Its Signatory Authority Chandra Kis ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2010)27VST433(NULL)

to the joint venture of the firm, the petitioner applied for allotment of land in the State of Uttarakhand through State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakhand Ltd. (for short hereinafter referred as SIDCUL). SIDCUL pleased to grant … the Lessor in developing the area.(ii) The Lessor reserves the right to all mines and minerals, claims washing goods, earth oil, queries in over and under the allotted plot and full right and power at the time … 265 of the Constitution and provisions of the Uttaranchal Value Added Tax Act, 2005.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit, counter … to the writ petition), whereby the said authority has passed order under Section 35(1) of VAT Act, 2005, directing that the petitioner would be liable

Director of Income tax-I Vs. Mitchell Drilling International (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

George Oakes (P.) Ltd. v. State of Madras [1962] 2 SCR 570. According to him, the decision of the Uttarakhand High Court in DIT v. Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd. (2009)317 ITR 156 was distinguishable on facts since it … Court in Chowringhee Sales Bureau Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax [1973] 87 ITR 542 and George Oakes (P.) Ltd. v. State of Madras [1962] … validity of the said statute the Supreme Court held that the expression turnovermeans the aggregate amount for which goods are bought or sold, whether for cash or for deferred payment or other valuable consideration, and when a … Rs.49,31,260 as per provisions of Section 44BB (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( ˜Act'). In computing the gross receipts for the purposes of

M/S Eureka Forbes Limited vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

whose twenty-fourth principal place of business is in the day of the States of Himachal Pradesh, month2. Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, succeedingRajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, such quarter. Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, … petitioner had filed their Form GST TRAN 1 on 16- 10-2017 under sections 140(1) and 140(3) of the GST Act.8. Further, since Form GST TRAN 1 was not filed intime by the petitioner, the credit in entirety sought … tax liability would occur.65. Further, a reference was also made to rules 87(6) and 87(7), which is extracted hereunder: "Rule 87. Electronic Cash Ledger.-(6) On … ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT HOLDING THAT SECTION 50(1) OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (CGST) ACT, 2017 AND SECTION