Advanced Search Results

Murthy Nayak M Alias Murthynaik Alias Maruti S/O Manjunaik vs the Stat ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 61(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND 42(3)(A) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT AND 25(1)(B) ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.IN CRL. PETITION NO.104071 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MURTHY NAYAK M … SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT, DHARWAD, FOR ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 310(2) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND UNDER SECTION 25(1B) OF ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND

Gadilingappa Alias N. Gadilingappa vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 61(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND 42(3)(A) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT AND 25(1)(B) ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.IN CRL. PETITION NO.104071 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MURTHY NAYAK M … SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT, DHARWAD, FOR ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 310(2) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND UNDER SECTION 25(1B) OF ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND

Shri. K. Mahaboobbashah S/O Shaikh Moulali vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 61(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 AND 42(3)(A) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT AND 25(1)(B) ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.IN CRL. PETITION NO.104071 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MURTHY NAYAK M … SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT, DHARWAD, FOR ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 310(2) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND UNDER SECTION 25(1B) OF ARMS ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND

Shivanand Alias Nandu Banappa Hattiyavar vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 62(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND UNDER -2-SECTION 25(1-B) OF ARMS ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL … ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 62(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND UNDER -2-SECTION 25(1-B) OF ARMS ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND

Arbaz Pasha S/O Late Chand Pasha vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 62(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA -2-SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND SECTION 25(1)(B) OF THE ARMS ACT, 1959, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR … OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 310(2), 310(5), 62(1), 333 OF BHARATIYA NYAYA -2-SANHITA, 2023, SECTION 42(3)(A) OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT, 2023 AND SECTION 25(1)(B) OF THE ARMS ACT, 1959, PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

H Manjunath S/O H.Veerabhadrappa vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

DHARWAD RURAL PS NO.177/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 310(2) OF BNS 2023, SECTION 42(3)A OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT, 2023 AND UNDER SECTION 25(1B) OF ARMS ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND

All India Digital Cable Federation vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of ...

Court : Kerala

with the State of Kerala. They have filed this writ petition inter alia seeking a declaration that the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Interconnection (AddressableSystems) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations 2022 (‘2022 Regulations’ for short) and Telecommunication (Broadcasting and … services and cable services.W.P.(C) No. 193/2023 : 26 :45. It is further contended that consequent to theintroduction of Section 2(1)(k) into the Act, 1997, the entire provisions of the Act, 1997, including all its recommendatory, regulatory and tariff

Sunil Tyagi & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Through the ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

follows: a) The Parliament, for the purpose of providing a comprehensive legislation for the Telecom sector has enacted the Telecommunications Act, 2023 (“Act”). For the purposes of permitting right of way and other ancillary requirements of the service providers in … (1) Any facility provider desiring to enter any immovable property, for the purposes specified under sub-section (2) of section 12 of the Act, shall do so with the prior consent and enter into an agreement with the

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared … reasons for reopening for AY 2016-17 were recordeda year back i.e., in 2023, and the reassessment notice under Section 148 for the said year was … the assessee interchangeably) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 and 2015-16 under Section 142 (2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), and also challenging the decision of the respondents/Revenue to initiate reassessment proceedings against the petitioner

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

13572/2024, CM APPL. 56719/2024 + W.P.(C) 13553/2024, CM APPL. 56682/2024 + W.P.(C) 14898/2024, CM APPL. 62466/2024 M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....PetitionerversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Advocates who appeared … reasons for reopening for AY 2016-17 were recordeda year back i.e., in 2023, and the reassessment notice under Section 148 for the said year was … the assessee interchangeably) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 and 2015-16 under Section 142 (2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), and also challenging the decision of the respondents/Revenue to initiate reassessment proceedings against the petitioner