Advanced Search Results

Sau. Savita Bajrang Kadam Vs. Manisha Ramdas More and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagarpanchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965 - Sections 9, 15, 15(2), 16, 21(10), 33 and 34; City of Nagpur Corporation Act

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR176; 2009(111)BomLR1794

certificate. The said document is obtained by the present applicant by applying to the caste scrutiny committee under the Right to Information Act. From the said certificate here is no doubt that the maiden name of opponent No. 1 was … form the opponent No. 1 had not completed the age of 21 years.In view of the provision under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Municipal Council Nagarpanchayat and Industrial Township Act, 1965; person must possess required qualification i.e. … 31.01.2009 passed by the District Judge, Nasik, whereby, an Election Petition No. 9/2007 filed by respondent No. 1(original petitioner) has been allowed and the election

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Gujarat State Information Commission and ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(7), 8, 9, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(3), 19(4) and 20; Constitution of India - Article 14; Gujarat Right to Information Rules, 2005 - Rule 6 and 6(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR2007Guj203; (2008)2GLR1559

of Rule on behalf of the respondents.Important issues have been raised for the adjudication by this Court, under the Right to Information Act, 2005, viz.:(I) Whether the third parry is entitled to get, written notice, of request of applicant (who … to or supplied by the third party and has been treated as confidential by the third party under Section 11(1) to be read with Section 7(7) of the Act 2005.(II) Whether the third party is entitled to … to the memo of the petition) as well as the order dated 9th March, 2007 passed by respondent No. 2 i.e. Labour Commissioner and Appellate

Vijaya Ragava Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1883)ILR7Mad466

misconduct or neglect of duty' may be omitted as useless, inasmuch as the general discretionary power would include the right to remove without any cause, or for the cause of misconduct or any other cause.19. One of the canons … 8th of June 1883 the plaintiff petitioned the Governor in Council for information as to the grounds of his removal, and on the 4th of … elected by the rate-payers of Salem one of the Municipal Commissioners of that town, under the provisions of Section 9 of the Towns' Improvement Act (Madras Act III of 1871).2. Notification of his election was published in the

V.M. Thiaggu S/O. V. Muthumanickam Gounder and V.M. Raghu S/O. V. Muth ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Karnataka State Commission for Women Act, 1995 - Sections 9; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005

copy of the same which was rejected. The petitioner No. 1 had to resort to the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 ultimately to obtain a copy .of the complaint.It is further slated that though no summons was … reputation of the petitioners and has caused deep anguish.It is contended that insofar as the Act is concerned, Section 9 provides for the functions of the Commission and the relevant Clause (1) provides that the Commission shall look

M.PonnaiyA. Vs. Balammal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 100 - Order 41 Rule 27; Tamil Nadu Land Survey and Boundaries Act - Section 9(2); Right to Information Act (RTI)

in Tallakulam (S.F.Nos.179 and 181/2), which the learned Counsel for the defendant would claim to have obtained under the Right to Information Act which emerged pendente lite and that is being relied upon by the defendant for the purpose of … others v. S.N.Goya reported in 2009-1-L.W.1.10. A plain reading of those precedents would reveal and demonstrate that under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Second Appeal cannot be entertained, unless substantial question of law is … are only the allottees of the respective plots namely plot Nos.98 and 97 respectively and those are adjacent plots and in such a case, it

Sevantilal Chimanlal Shah Vs. V.D. Dalvi and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 7,9, 9(1) and 9(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 226; Post Office Rules - Rules 30, 30(1), 30(2), 30(3) and 30(5); Press and Registration of Book Act - Sections 5; Specific Relief Act - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1961Bom105; 1961BomCR(Cri)105; (1960)62BOMLR832

of the authorities. The applicant may be called upon to give such information as required. The Rules, however do not give any right to a … The petitioner therefore contends that ru!es of natural justice have not been observed. The petitioner further contends that the right to transmit his publication at concessional rates is a statutory right of the petitioner and by reason of the … the Act renewal of registration must be granted except when two specific conditions mentioned in Sub-clause (2) of section 9 of the Act are found as not having been complied with. Except for the purpose of determining the

Ramnikbhai Ramjibhai and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat Thro. Vilasini Ramc ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 6(3), 9, 11 and 18; Right to Information Act (RTI); Town Planning Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 31, 136 and 226

Reported in : (2008)3GLR2602

observing that the same would be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners to seek information under Right to Information Act. That even before the Hon'ble Supreme Court disposed of the aforesaid S.L.P., the petitioners have preferred the … not only that even Award under Section 11 of the Act, after following due procedure as required under Section 9 of the Act is also declared by the Special Land Acquisition Officer long back and except the petitioners,

National Mineral Developmnet Corporation Vs. Government of India and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialEnvironment

Acts : Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 5, 5(1), 10, 11(2), 11(5) and 18; Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1994; Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 3; Forest (Conservation) Ordinance, 1980; Forest Conservation (Amendment) Act, 1988; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 9, 11, 14, 14(3), 15, 15(2), 24B and 54; Forest (Conservation) Rule 2003 - Rules 2, 6, 6(1), 6(3) 7, 8 and 24; Forest Conservation Rules, 1981 - Rules 4, 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(101)DRJ339

impugned order was kept secret, and under wraps until it applied for a copy of the same under the Right to Information Act, 2005 on 15th May 2007 and the same was furnished only on 28th May 2007. Thereafter, the … pollution which may be caused by mining or prospecting operations. 23. Rules 9 and 11 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (hereafter 'the Concession Rules') … challenges the validity of the approval of the Union Government (hereafter 'the Union'), Ministry of Mines, given under Section 5(1) of Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter the 'MMDR Act'), for granting a prospecting

Lotus Refineries Private Limited Vs. National Spot Exchange Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Defendant Exchanges Rules, which provides for the function of the Arbitration Panel. The Plaintiff states that by restricting the right of the Arbitrators to give an award only in cases between different classes of Members of the Exchange, … to the parties and witnesses. 3.1.2.4 Procedure for appearance, hearing, filing of information and counter claims and taking witnesses and evidence of assessors and experts … Proteins Ltd. (supra) , which was an Arbitration Petition filed by NSEL against M/s. N.K. Proteins Ltd. under Section 9 of the Act, is misplaced in the light of the facts and circumstances of the present case. The

B. Venkatesalu and Another Vs. The Additional Chief Secretary to Gover ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

known as to how the petitioners came to possess the same without there being any application filed under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioners' have managed to take a copy of the same from the office of Sub-Registrar … for a sum of Rs.13,883.60/-. The Award clearly stated that notices were promulgated / served in accordance with Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. But, curiously in para 4 of the affidavit filed in support of