Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the right to information section 5 · Page 1 of about 129,131 results (0.452 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 23 2007

Mr. Surupsingh Hrya Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Additional S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-2007

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 11, 18, 19(1) and 19(4); Central Act; Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Goa Rights of Information Act, 1997- Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : AIR2007Bom121; 2007(3)ALLMR442; 2007(3)BomCR134; (2007)109BOMLR844; 2007(4)MhLj573

the Act reads as under:3.Right to information Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information. Section 4 deals with obligations of public authorities and the maintenance of records. A person who desires to obtain … by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. In that case what was in issue was the proviso to Section 5 of the Goa Rights of Information Act, 1997. The proviso there was placed after the various provisions. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1969

Kanianwali Co-operative Farming Society at Kanianwali Through Its Secr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 - Sections 10-A, 10-B and 19-B; Punjab Security of Land Tenures (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1962; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1970P& H157

shall affect the utilization thereof in Clause (a). Explanation:-- Such utilization of any surplus area will not affect the right of the land-owner to receive rent from the tenant so settled. 16.-- Save in the case of land … prescribed period, then the Collector may, in respect of him, obtain the information required to be shownin the return through such agency as he may … acres, including any other land or part thereof, if any, that he owns in addition, and so also Sub-section 5 (a) of Section 2 as under:-- '(5-a) 'Surplus Area' means the area other than the reserved area, and,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2011

Basawanappa Vs. the Karnataka State Information Commission Rep. by Its ...

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

Decided on : Jan-14-2011

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 2011ILR(Kar)1976; 2011(4)KCCR2834(DB); 2012(2)KantLJ237; 2012AIR(NOC)302

Court, rejecting the Writ Petition on the ground that the appellant is entitled to file an Appeal under the Right to Information Act (in short, ‘the RTI Act’) to the Appellate Authority viz., the State Chief Information Commissioner. 2. Learned … with the verdict Reserving liberty to appellant to file an Appeal, the petition is rejected” 7. As per Section 5 of the RTI Act, every Public Authority shall, within one hundred days of the enactment of the Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 13 2012

Ms Saihavahana Ispat Limited. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2012

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act ; Mineral Concession Rules - Rule 26(1), 54; MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT - Section 30; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 14 Rule 2; Constitution of India. - Article 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; Right To Information Act

Sandur Taluk. Bellary Dist, for a period of twenty years. On the basis of the applications made under the Right to Information Act, 2006, the petitioner sought copies of the application filed by respondent No.3 for grant of mining lease … condonation of delay, if any, in filing this writ petition.26. We notice that these decisions are rendered under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, under which the parameters of consideration of sufficient cause are quite different from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2025

Vinson M Paul vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-10-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioner is appointed as the State Chief Information Commissioner with reference to the provisions of Section 16 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short, the ‘Act’). Sub-section (5) makes it clear that a State Chief Information Commissioner is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2005

Ravi Shankar Srivastava Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-09-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 7, 7(1), 8, 13(1), 13(1)(2), 13(2) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 120B; Judges Protection Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(2); Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 6, 6A and 26; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(2), 23, 24 and 25; Information Technology Act - Sections 65(1)(4) and 92; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 5 and 6; All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3 and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 155(2), 157, 162, 173, 173(2), 197 and 197(1); Rajasthan Land Revenue Industrial Area Allotment Rules - Rule 13(1); Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rule 419A; Consti

Reported in : RLW2005(3)Raj1736; 2005(2)WLC612

Supreme Court in the case of PUCL (supra), reiterating his arguments that safeguards against telephone tapping emanate from right to privacy which flows from Article 21 of the Constitution. Thus any violation of right to privacy would be … on 9.6.2004.4. The allegation in the FIR was that according to source information illegal benefit was to be granted by the petitioner by passing a … would exclude telephonic transcript from considerations altogether.22. It is submitted that telephone tapping can only be done under Section 5(2) of Telegraph Act in situations of public emergency and public safety. None of these situations had arises in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2002

Andhra Pradesh Hotels Association Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-17-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2) and 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(4)ALD545; 2002(5)ALT33; [2001(91)FLR717]; (2002)IIILLJ623AP

42 and 43 of the Constitution, the State shall direct its policy towards securing, that the citizens have the right to an adequate means to livelihood, that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and women … build a welfare society in which justice social, economical and political shall inform all institutions of our national life. The hopes and aspirations aroused by … 23-3-1999 published in the A.P. Gazette on 25-3-1999 proposing revision of minimum wages in the hotel industry under Section 5(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short, the Act). The previous revision of minimum wages had taken

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2006

K.L.D. Nagasree Vs. Government of India, Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-11-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 5, 5(1), 5(2), 7 and 7(2); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rule 419A, 419A(1), 419(5), 419(8) and 419(9); Indian Telegraph (First Amendment) Rules, 1999; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 21 and 32

Reported in : AIR2007AP102; 2007(1)ALD553; 2007(1)ALT473

in detail and while observing that telephone- tapping is a serious invasion of an individual's privacy held that the right to privacy is a part of the right to life and personal liberty enshrined under Article 21 of the … is necessary under Section 5(2) of the Act shall include whether the information which is considered necessary to acquire could reasonably be acquired by other … filed assailing the order of the 1st respondent dated 17.11.2003 passed in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 directing interception of messages from the mobile telephone of the petitioner.2. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2006

Satyendra Nath Mondal and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-03-2006

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 1(3), 3, 4(1), 5(1), 5(2), 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 27 and 28

Reported in : AIR2006Cal151

public authorities. Section 3 of the Act ensures, subject to the provisions of the Act, all citizens have the right to information. Section 6 postulates that a person who desires to obtain any information under the Act shall make a request … Act is as under:Section 1(3). The provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 4, Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 5, Sections 12, 13, 15, 16, 24, 27 and 28 shall come into force at once, and the remaining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2009

Vijay Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2009

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 19, 22 and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 15, 16, 18(3), 18(4), 19, 19(1), 22, 33 and 226

Reported in : AIR2010Delhi7; 160(2009)DLT631

the Central Information Commission (CIC) dated 17.12.2008 (the impugned order] affirming the decision of the appellate authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 [hereafter, 'the Information Act'] not to allow disclosure of the information sought.2. The facts necessary for … have been given the widest possible amplitude. By virtue of Sections 3, 5, 6 and 7, every public authority requested to provide information is under … his letter dated 25.04.2007 on the ground that the particulars sought for related to personal information, exempted under Section 8(1)(j) of the Information Act; that disclosure of such information had no relation with any public activity or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial