Advanced Search Results

Chalisgaon Education Society and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Right to Information

the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act. (B) Respondent No.2 had sought information from the petitioner under the Right to Information Act. (C) As the said information was not made available to respondent No.2, he preferred an appeal before … down a procedure in para 88 for selecting and appointing the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Vigilance Commissioners under Section 3 (3) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 and has laid down therein that the empanelment of persons

Subhash Popatlal Dave Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Right to Information Act, 2005 - Section 3, 2(e), 8(h), 24; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 32, 14, 19, 21, 22; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. ; Human Rights Act

3 of the R.T.I. Act, 2005,provides that subject to the provisions of the Act, all citizens would have the right to information. Section 8, however, makes an exemption from disclosure of information. While setting out the instances in which there would

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corpn. and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(28A), 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9(1), 40, 80HH, 80HH(2), 80I, 80I(2), 90(2), 195(1) and 261; Interest-tax Act, 1978 - Sections 2

Reported in : 181(2003)CLT134

that unless and until assessee's contribution or parenthood is effective in bringing into existence a debt or a right to receive the payment or, in other words, a debitum in praesenti, solvendum in futuro, it cannot be said … interest carried under an expressed contractual term. That Act applies to a contract of sale of goods and Section 3 thereof provides that a debt created by virtue of an obligation under such contract to pay the whole … This is because the main judgment of the Tribunal from which the first three questions of law raised in Tax Appeal No. 273 of 2002

Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr vs.krishan Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Section 2(j) defines “right to information” conferred on all citizens under Section 3 of the Act to mean the right to information accessible under the Act, “which is held by or under the control of any public authority”. While deciding

M/S Shonkh Technology International Ltd. Vs. State Information Commiss ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 19(3), 8(1)(a); Indian Companies Act, 1956; Motor Vehicles Act

ideals. The definitions and particularly of the term "right to information" defined in Section 2(j) is relevant. By section 3, all citizens have the right to information subject to the provisions of the RTI Act. The obligations of … petitions impugn the orders dated 23.03.2011 passed by the State Information Commissioner, Konkan Region. The proceedings are under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter for short referred to as "RTI Act"). 4 The Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2912/2011 is

Mr. Surupsingh Hrya Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Additional S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 11, 18, 19(1) and 19(4); Central Act; Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Goa Rights of Information Act, 1997- Sections 5; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : AIR2007Bom121; 2007(3)ALLMR442; 2007(3)BomCR134; (2007)109BOMLR844; 2007(4)MhLj573

the Act reads as under:3.Right to information Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information. Section 4 deals with obligations of public authorities and the maintenance of records. A person who desires to obtain

Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 8(1), 10. 22 and 24; Government Act, 1978; Judicial Disclosure Responsibility Act, 2007; Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act, 1951; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Freedom of Information Act 2000; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Indian Trusts Act - Sections 88; Environmental Information Regulations, 2004; Constitution of India - Articles 3, 10, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 32, 121, 122, 123, 124, (7), 124(2), 124(5), 217, 217(1), 233 and 235

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT305; 2010(1)KarLJ472

hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed?. The Act restricts the right to information to citizens (Section 3). An applicant seeking information does not have to give any reasons why he/she needs such information except such … 2(j) 'RIGHT TO INFORMATION'56. Two definitions are crucial for answering the first issue i.e. 'Information' [Section 2(f)] and 'Right to Information' [Section 2(j)]. Information is defined to mean any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices,

inst.of Chartered Accountants of IndiA. Vs. Shaunak H Sayta and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Section 3; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Section 8(1)(e)(d), 9, 4(1)(b) and (c); Constitution of India - Article 12; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51, 52; Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 - Regulation 38, 39,

respondent accordingly. 3. On 18.1.2008 the appellant submitted an application seeking the following information under 13 heads, under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (`RTI Act' for short) :  1) Educational qualification of the examiners & Moderators with subject wise … 2. The appellant Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (for short `ICAI') is a body corporate established under section 3 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. One of the functions of the appellant council is to conduct the

Union of India Vs. Namit Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Sharma, the respondent herein, had prayed for declaring the provisions of Sections 12(5), 12(6), 15(5) and 15(6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short ‘the Act’) as ultra vires the Constitution. Sections 12(5), 12(6), 15(5) and 15(6) of … down a procedure in para 88 for selecting and appointing the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Vigilance Commissioners under Section 3 (3) of the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 and has laid down therein that the empanelment of persons

Central Public Information Officer. Vs. Subhash Chandra Agrawal.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI) - Sections 6(3), 8(i)(j), 19

objected to Prime Minister's Office (PMO) also". He further requested the CPIO not to invoke Section 6(3) of the Right to Information Act (for short `the Act').4. The CPIO, Supreme Court of India promptly replied to the application so filed