Advanced Search Results

Bans NaraIn Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 59(1) and 59(28); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1977All6

without any order as to costs. Service - prison rules - Sections 10 and 59 (28) of Prisons Act, 1894 and Rule 1135 of Chapter XII of Jail Manual U.P. - Rule provides power to Government to make … under the Cantonments Act discharging any such duties. The duties of the Cantonment Board are laid down in Section 62 and amongst others, clause (xiv) lays down the duties of establishing and maintaining or assisting primary schools only.

Sri Shashikiran G vs State Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

referred to hereinabove.5. Objection statements have been filed by the Respondents in W.P. Nos.57465-57466/2013 contending inter- alia;(a). That the prison was inaugurated in the year 2001 and was constructed with the planned capacity of 2,292 inmates. That, at … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 19.07.2012 PASSED UNDER SECTION 4[1] OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT 1894 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. WRIT PETITION NO.51672/2013 BETWEEN:1. LATE PRAMILA SINCE DECEASED BEING REPRESENTED BY HER LRS 1a. … WARD NO.1917. SMT K M SHAKUNTHALA W/O G A KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS SITE NO 53 OF SY NO 65/1 JAIL ROAD, NAGANATHAPURA, B.B.M.P

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

Police, Central Prison, Trichy and finding him guilty, for having committed the prison offence, Under Section 45 of the Prison Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1894) r/w. Rules 297(8), (ii), (44) and 57 of Tamil Nadu Prison Manual Volume … Law by H.W.R. Wade (Administrative Law by H.W.R. Wade, Sixth Edition) and the relevant passages occur at pages 620 and 621 as reflected below: ?.Habeas corpus cannot be used as a means of appeal but only of

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

subject to solitary confinement which is contrary to the provision of the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Prison Act and Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The Sessions Court of Delhi held him guilty of … Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners … him. He is for the time being, the slave of the State 62 v (21 Gratt) 790, 796 (1871).During the century that followed, the American

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the prisoner from that prison to any prison in the other State. (2) The officer in charge of the prison to which any person is removed under sub-section(1) shall receive and detain him, so far as may be, … Town; 229/05; |341/302/307/34 IPC | | |25.10.05 | | |18 |Muffasil PS; 333/11; |188 IPC & 52 Prisoner Act 1894 | | |0510.11 |u/s 420/468/471 IPC | |19 |Muffasil PS; 56/07; |147/149/341/342/323/307/337 IPC | | |20.03.07 | | … PS; 220/14; 17.06.14|302/34/120 B IPC & 27 Arms Act | |22 |C-2; 62/07; 03.08.07 |52 Prisoner Act 1894 | |23 |C-2; 67/08; 01.09.08 |52 Prisoner

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

Sonu Sardar vs.the Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

On 14.02.2015, the petitioner‟s lawyers by hand delivered a letter to the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Raipur advising the prison authorities against initiating black warrant proceedings, as the letter dated 24.05.2014 was still pending before the President of … it can be imposed only by a judicial order and not otherwise.72. Since Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 provided for what seemed to be a parallel punishment at the hands of the executive, Mr.Sunil Batra approached … of the... Petitioner.” (Emphasis Supplied) W.P. (Crl) 441/2015 Page 47 of 95 62. The respondents have argued that paragraph 29 is repugnant to the submissions

State Vs. Chandra Bali Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45, 45(1), 46(1), 50 and 52; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1960All124; 1960CriLJ203

- refusal to eat food by prisoners - Section 45(1) and Second Proviso to Section 52 of Prisons Act, 1894 - declining food offered by prison authorities is an offence under the Act - punishment can be inflicted … under the Cantonments Act discharging any such duties. The duties of the Cantonment Board are laid down in Section 62 and amongst others, clause (xiv) lays down the duties of establishing and maintaining or assisting primary schools only.

Rohit Chaturvedi versus State of Uttarakhand & Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 6 S.C.R. 263

a very significant role in the death of the deceased. Merely because the co-accused has been released from the prison is no reason to grant similar relief to the petitioner. The impugned letter holding that the petitioner is … Criminal Procedure, 1973; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Penal Code, 1860; Prisons Act, 1894; Constitution of India.List of Keywords Uttarakhand State (for Remission/Premature Release of Convicted Prisoners Sentenced to Life Imprisonment by … SCC 481; Laxman Naskar v. State of W.B [2000] Supp. 3 SCR 62 : (2000) 7 SCC 626; Laxman Naskar v. Union of India [2000] … dated 09.05.2003 of the elder sister of the deceased, Case No.162/2003 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”) was registered

Haroobhai M. Mehta Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1966)7GLR597

the Defence of India Rules, 1962, (hereafter called 'the Rules') that petitioners be detained in the Rajkot Central Prison. The orders stated that the State Government was satisfied in regard to the five petitioners that it was … not open to petitioners to raise the aforesaid contention. In that case, the validity of the Land Acquisition Act (1894) was being challenged by recourse to an argument different from the one on which it was challenged in … emergency was laid before both Houses of Parliament on November 8, 49, 62, and was approved by Rajya Sabha on November 13, 1962, and by … petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 491(l)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act No. V of 1898). Each