Advanced Search Results

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and … Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56 … 343 vide annexures 8 and 9 to the writ petition.11. In paragraph 38 of the writ petition it is alleged that photocopies of the documents

Fousia Rabins vs Joint Secretary (Cofeposa)

Court : Kerala

is a serious risk of harm to the detenus detained under the COFEPOSA Act. Though entire inmates in the prison have taken vaccination as directed by the jail authorities, the said Murukan is not willing to receive vaccination … st respondent to the 2nd respondent, but that has not been considered atall. Section 3(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 categorises 'criminal prisoner' as a person duly committed to custody under the writ, warrant or order of any … kept apart and that civil prisoners shall be kept apart from the criminal prisoners. There are similar provisions, Section 38, in the Kerala Prisons Act, 2010, where also classification of prisoners have been made and it is peremptory

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

we may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of … this Court vide order dated 28th September, 2004. He also preferred, along with the appeal, application under section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [for short 'Cr.P.C.'] praying for suspension of sentence and to release him

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the prisoner from that prison to any prison in the other State. (2) The officer in charge of the prison to which any person is removed under sub-section(1) shall receive and detain him, so far as may be, … Town; 229/05; |341/302/307/34 IPC | | |25.10.05 | | |18 |Muffasil PS; 333/11; |188 IPC & 52 Prisoner Act 1894 | | |0510.11 |u/s 420/468/471 IPC | |19 |Muffasil PS; 56/07; |147/149/341/342/323/307/337 IPC | | |20.03.07 | | … and a criminal case was registered against him under Sections 341, 323, 380, 364, 435/34 IPC for abduction, etc. of the petitioner’s two sons in

Gauri Shanker and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 25A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC426

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and … Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … validity.18. Similarly in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 [vide para 38) another Constitution Bench decision of the Supreme Court observed :'Constitutional deference to

L. Muruganantham versus State of Tamil Nadu & Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 7 S.C.R. 935

persons with varying disabilities. In Shri Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka6, this Court noted that the outdated Prison Act, 1894, must be thoroughly overhauled. The appellant submits that systemic disregard for disability rights has led to irreversible harm … Tamil Nadu to be conducted by an expert committee; 5) The prison authorities shall ensure complete compliance with Sections 40 and 45 of the RPwD Act, 2016, Rule 15 of the 2017 Rules and the Harmonized Guidelines, … provisions of the RPwD Act, 2016 - specifically Sections 6, 25, and 38 - which mandate the State to ensure healthcare and non-discriminatory treatment for

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

subject to solitary confinement which is contrary to the provision of the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Prison Act and Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The Sessions Court of Delhi held him guilty of … Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners … some American decisions have neatly put it Federal Reporter 2d. Series, Vol. 386, p. 684; Donnel Douglas v. Maurice H. Sigler.The matter of internal management

The State Of Haryana Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bittu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that these policies of remission are in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 59(5) of the Prisons Act, 1894, contemplating “for the award of marks and the shortening of sentences” and thus, they are statutory rules. Sections … This conclusion was arrived on the following ground: (SCC p. 619, para38) 38. A right to be considered for remission, keeping in view the constitutional … & Haryana at Chandigarh on 12.5.2020 whereby the policies of the State Government to grant remission to the prisoners were decided, inter alia, directing the State to consider the feasibility of drafting a fresh policy particularly in

Saibanna S/o Ningappa Natikar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

a letter, no copy of the same has been furnished to him. That despite a request on 19.01.2013, the prison authorities refused to furnish the same to the petitioner’s Advocate, who visited the prison to have his signatures … sentence of death already imposed. The learned counsel would take the Court through Section 30 of the Prisons Act, 1894, to buttress her argument. She would submit that a separate confinement of a death row prisoner is permissible … Full Bench and would place reliance on paragraph Nos.30, 31, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 48, 49, 51 and 52. She would then take the