Advanced Search Results

Mohana Ramaswami vs the Secretary

Court : Chennai

of Regulation 51 of the Post Office Regulations, 2024 framed by the Director General under Section 13 of the Post Office Act, 2023.2. Learned counsel for petitioner would argue that Regulation51 of the Post Office Regulations, 2024 suffers from manifest arbitrariness

The State of Karnataka vs Umesha T N

Court : Karnataka

(P), KORA (H), TUMAKURU (T) AND (D) - 560 095.26. C.L.MANJUNATH, S/O LATE LAKSHMANAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, VENKATESHPURA, SIRA GATE, TUMAKURU-572 106.27. HANUMANAYAK S/O CHINNANAYAK, AGED 44 YEARS, GOLLAHALLI TANDYA, AANTARAHALLI (P), DODDABALLAPURA (T), … SWAMY.K.., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 TO R27; SRI. THAMMAIAH.H.N., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN WP NO.19588/2023 (S-RES), TO SET

The Union of India, Represented by the Superintendent of Post Offices ...

Court : Kerala

is also their contention that there was no other suitable or convenient building to shift their office Since the post office is a utility service, they prayed for dismissal of the rent control petitions.3. The trial court considered both … RCR.66 and 129 of 2023 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE … aggrieved by the orders of eviction passed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, (for short, Act') in RCP Nos. 85 and 86 of 2016 filed by the respondents herein. The … DESOM, P.O. TIRUR, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676307 2 ROUBEELA,AGED 43 YEARS D/O.PARAPPURATH HYDROSE HAJI,PARAPPURATH (H) TANALUR AMSOM,PAKARA DESOM, P.O. TIRUR, TIRUR TALUK,

The Union of India, Represented by the Superintendent of Post Offices ...

Court : Kerala

is also their contention that there was no other suitable or convenient building to shift their office Since the post office is a utility service, they prayed for dismissal of the rent control petitions.3. The trial court considered both … RCR.66 and 129 of 2023 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE … aggrieved by the orders of eviction passed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, (for short, Act') in RCP Nos. 85 and 86 of 2016 filed by the respondents herein. The … DESOM, P.O. TIRUR, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676307 2 ROUBEELA,AGED 43 YEARS D/O.PARAPPURATH HYDROSE HAJI,PARAPPURATH (H) TANALUR AMSOM,PAKARA DESOM, P.O. TIRUR, TIRUR TALUK,

Dharma Nand vs Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

show that the demand-cum-allotment letter was actually served upon the petitioner. For the said reasons, a certificate of post office, registration acknowledgment due card, etc. or some proof should be filed by the DDA. Hence, the reliance of … Indian EvidenceAct, 1872, (Section 119 illustration (f) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) to state that there is a presumption which operates in favour of … of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A Writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in canceling the allotment of the allotted flat without serving the allotment cum demand letter … Delhi.5. In 1983-1984, the petitioner shifted his residence to F/38-A, Gali No. 4A, Poorvi Vinod Nagar, Delhi-110091 and the DDA was duly informed of the

H.S. RAMESH Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

REPRESENTED BY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT.2. H. J. SRINIVAS, S/O DODDAJUNJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, No. 232, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, K. R. EXTENSION, HOSAKOTE TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562114. …RESPONDENTS(BY SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1; … K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI D. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THEJUDGEMENT DATED 08/11/2023 PASSED IN WP No.22817/2023 BYTHE LEARNED

Mevindi Veeresha Alias Eranna a Alur vs State by Harihar Town Police S ...

Court : Karnataka

YEARS, R/AT J C BADAVANE, 4TH MAIN, 5TH CROSS, HARIHARA, HOUSE NO.59, 3469, MUNDARAGI VILLAGE, -2-BELLADA ONI, NEAR POST OFFICE, TALUK MUNDARAGI, DISTRICT GADAG - 582 118. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI HARISH GANAPATHY, HCGP FOR R1 (PH); NOTICE TO … 1860 (‘IPC’, for short) read with Sections 4 and 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (‘POCSO’, for short). -4-3. It was submitted, without proper investigation,charge-sheet was filed on 03.10.2023, wherein offences alleged … SPL. CASE NO. 714/2023 ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 227 OF CR.P.C. B) ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER

Sri.Pappu Basak vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

OPP TVS SHOW ROOM, VARTHUR, BANGALORE CITY - 560 087. PERMANENT ADDRESS, R/AT VILLAGE NO.2 PARASHANI HABI, SEPON POST OFFICE, PS-MORAN HAT, DISTRICT CHARIADIO ASSAM - 785 673. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R-1; SRI. TEJAS … ORDERThe petitioners, who are facing trial for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109, and 3(5) of the BNS Act, 2023, are before this Court seeking relief.2. The prosecution alleges that on 19.7.2024, while the accused, along with their … HEMANT CHANDANGOUDARORAL ORDERThe petitioners, who are facing trial for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109, and 3(5) of the BNS Act, 2023, are before this … HCGP FOR R-1; SRI. TEJAS N., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.11766/2024,

Sri Prasad B R vs the Assistant General Manager

Court : Karnataka

KARNATAKA -3-2. THE BRANCH MANAGER FORMERLY STATE BANK OF MYSORE NOW STATE BANK OF INDIA DODDABALLAPURA BRANCH-400 026 POST OFFICE ROAD POST BOX NO.1 PIN - 561 203 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI N. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI. PRASAD B.R. … PIN - 561 203 …RESPONDENTS (SRI N. VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT No.2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THEKARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY

Accurate Auctioneers vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

jurisdictional Commissioner of Customs, (ii) the jurisdictional Customs Commissioner to issue instructions to the concerned officers and staff posted at the customs station to ensure that details of the goods/shipments which are on hold for investigation or … customs locations was not forthcoming. In these circumstances, the Central Vigilance Commission4 appointed a Committee of Chief Vigilance Officers to examine the reasons for delay in disposal of unclaimed/uncleared cargo. The Committee observed that owing to the … of unclaimed/uncleared cargo, lying with custodians, under Section 482 of the Customs Act, 19623. Para 2 of the Circular notes the fact that, despite several … procedure for expeditious disposal of unclaimed/uncleared cargo, lying with custodians, under Section 482 of the Customs Act, 19623. Para 2 of the Circular notes the