Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Afzal Mohammad Sharif versus the State of Maharashtra and Oth ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]10S.C.R.78

in the communal riots that broke out in Akola City, Maharashtra, on 13.05.2023 owing to a social media post - The appellant stated that under the mistaken identity/belief that the deceased was a Muslim, the four unknown … a direction to the police authorities concerned to register an offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 1, … Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration The complaint of the appellant before the High Court was that the police officers concerned had failed in their duty by not registering a First Information Report apropos the attack and assault … police personnel of the Old City Police Station at Akola, no other action was taken - Writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed -

Mohana Ramaswami vs the Secretary

Court : Chennai

of Regulation 51 of the Post Office Regulations, 2024 framed by the Director General under Section 13 of the Post Office Act, 2023.2. Learned counsel for petitioner would argue that Regulation51 of the Post Office Regulations, 2024 suffers from manifest arbitrariness … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.No.5716 of 2026

Sri. Vinay Badigger vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

KARNATAKA-560001.2. SMT. BHAVYA N W/O VINAY, -2- AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT. NO 92/1, 6TH CROSS, PULAKESHI ROAD, POST OFFICE ROAD, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU-560016. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. K.L.SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS … THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498A, 504, 506 OF THE IPC 1860 AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE D.P ACT 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE X ADDL.CMM, MAYOHALL AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER. IN CRL.P NO. 9140/2023 … FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498A, 504, 506 OF THE IPC 1860 AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE D.P ACT 1961, PENDING ON THE FILE

Sri Umesh Daulat Ahuja vs the State of Maharashtra by

Court : Karnataka

DAULAT AHUJA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS PERMANENT RESIDENT OF SNEH SAGAR APT FLAT No. 605 O.T. SECTION, NEAR POST OFFICE ULHASNAGAR-1, DISTRICT THANE MAHARASHTRA - 421 001. PRESENTLY RESIDING IN C/O HIS FATHER-IN-LAW MURALI N AT: No.81/258 5TH … No.0025/2025 REGISTERED BY NAVI MUMBAI POLICE STATION MAHARASHTRA FOR THE OFFENCES ALLEGED U/S 3(5), 318(4), 319(2) OF BNS ACT 2023 AND SECTION 66(D) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000, PENDING BEFORE FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, BELAPUR COURT, CBD BELAPUR, NAVI

Mr. Kalam Narendra @ Pandu vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

contra, learned Senior Central Government Counsel opposing the petition submitted that the parcel which was received in Foreign Post Office suspected to be containingthe contraband. It was opened and found that it was containing 34.38 grams of ganja … Singh @ Jagga Gill Vs State of Punjab7.2024 SCC Online SC 934 2023 SCC Online SC 1244 2020 Supreme (P & H) 1203 2022 Supreme … BENGALURU ZONAL UNIT, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 8(C), 20(B)(II)(B), 22(C), 27 AND 28 OF NDPS ACT WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G. UMA CRIMINAL PETITION

Dharma Nand vs Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

show that the demand-cum-allotment letter was actually served upon the petitioner. For the said reasons, a certificate of post office, registration acknowledgment due card, etc. or some proof should be filed by the DDA. Hence, the reliance of … Indian EvidenceAct, 1872, (Section 119 illustration (f) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) to state that there is a presumption which operates in favour of … of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A Writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in canceling the allotment of the allotted flat without serving the allotment cum demand letter … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 16.04.2026 + W.P.(C) 70/2013 DHARMA NAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. Saini &

S.Swamiyappan Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN S.Swamiyappan S/o.V.Subramanian, Door number 1-43 Araikarai Naluvedhapathy Village and Post Office Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police, Vettaikaraniruppu Police Station, Nagapattinam District, … apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS Act 2023 and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act in Crime No.308 of 2025, on the file of the respondent … Nagapattinam District, (Crime No. 308/2025) ..Respondent(s)PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory

Om Prakash Ambadkar versus the State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1469

to direct investigation by the police authorities. The Magistrate is, therefore, not supposed to act merely as a Post Office and needs to adopt a judicial approach while considering an application seeking investigation by the Police. 26. The … u/s.156(3) - Discussed. [Para 24] Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.156 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - s.175 - Changes brought by BNSS to the scheme of s.156, CrPC - Enumerated. [Paras 29-35] Case … [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1469 : 2025 INSC 139 Om Prakash Ambadkar v. The State … and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Magistrate passed an order under Section 156(3), Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 directing registration of FIR against

Jacob Matghew vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Service(RMS) Post office, Kottayam at a concessional rate. Onconsideration of the provisions of Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and clause 139 of the Post Office Guide Part -1, this Court set aside the similar order … HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1945 PETITIONER/S: JACOB MATGHEW PUBLISHER, "THE WEEK", MANORAMA BUILDING,, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, COCHIN-682 036. BY ADVS.

Malayala Manorama Co.Ltd. vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Post Office, Kottayam, at a concessional rate. On consideration of the provisions of Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 and Clause 139 of Post office Guide part I, this Court set aside the similar order and … HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 32037 OF 2013 PETITIONER: MALAYALA MANORAMA CO.LTD. P.B.NO.26, K.K.ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001 REPRESENTED … MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 32037 OF 2013 PETITIONER: MALAYALA MANORAMA CO.LTD. P.B.NO.26,