Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the poisons act section 8 · Page 1 of about 3,350 results (0.081 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 21 2001

All Kerala Scientific and Surgical Dealers Association and ors. Vs. St ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-21-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Posions Act, 1919 - Sections 2 and 8; Kerala Poisons Rules, 1996 - Rule 7; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2001Ker369

ORDERG. Sivarajan, J. 1. The matter arises under the Poisons Act, 1919 (herein after referred to as the Act') and the Kerala Poisons Rules, 1996 (for short 'the Rules'). … licenses may be granted; and the classes of persons to whom alone any such poison may be sold. Section 8 gives power to the State Government to make rules generally to carry out the purposes and objects of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2024

Jollyamma vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-30-2024

with the accused Nos.2 and 3, and in furtherance of their common intention, around 19.00 hours on 26.8.2008, poisoned Tom Thomas with sodium cyanide concealed in vitamin capsules. On 14.4.2009,when the Investigating Agency had arrested the petitioner … 110, 120(B), 302, 465, 471, 474 read with 34 of IPC and Section 2 r/w 6(2) of thePoison Act, 1919 in connection with the alleged murder of the petitioner’s former father-in-law Tom Thomas. The essence of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2024

Jollyamma vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-30-2024

with the accused Nos.2 and 3, and in furtherance of their common intention, around 19.00 hours on 26.8.2008, poisoned Tom Thomas with sodium cyanide concealed in vitamin capsules. On 14.4.2009,when the Investigating Agency had arrested the petitioner … 110, 120(B), 302, 465, 471, 474 read with 34 of IPC and Section 2 r/w 6(2) of thePoison Act, 1919 in connection with the alleged murder of the petitioner’s former father-in-law Tom Thomas. The essence of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 1991

Goodwill Paint and Chemical Industry Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Poisons Act, 1919 - Sections 2, 4, 5 and 8; Delhi Poisons Rules, 1926 - Rules 2, 12 and 13; Constitution of India - Article 32; Poisons Act, 1904

Reported in : AIR1991SC2150; 1992(2)BLJR803; (1992)2CompLJ315(SC); JT1991(4)SC276; 1991(2)SCALE670; (1991)4SCC406; 1992Supp(1)SCC16; [1991]Supp1SCR219

petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners have questioned the constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Poisons Act, 1919 (12 of 1919) (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The grounds on which the vires of the provisions is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2004

State of U.P. Vs. Ajai Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113B

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3926

the victim was admitted in the District Hospital on 7-6-1988 at 1 a.m. as a case of suspected poisoning by her husband Anil Gupta (deceased). Dr. N. C. Tyagi P.W. 7 had examined her. Her general condition … have been acquitted of the charges of Sections 498A and 304B, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The accused-respondent No. 3-Anil Kumar Gupta is the husband of the deceased-Poonam, whereas accused-respondent No. 1 -Ajai Kumar … Station New Mandi, Muzaffarnagar and the report was lodged on 7-6-1988 at 8.50 a.m. by Dharmendra Kumar Jain P.W. 1, father of the unfortunate victim

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2011

Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan, and ors. Vs. State of KeralA.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326, 328, 201, 299, 300, 304, 307 Read with Section 34 ; Kerala Abkari Act, 1955 - Sections 55(a)(g)(h)(i), 57A, 58, 8 ; Cochin Abkari Act ; Madras Abkari Act ;

authorized to give permission in that behalf. Similarly, Section 7 prohibits the export of liquor or intoxicating drug. Section 8 is an important Section which speaks for the prohibition of manufacture, import, export, transport, transit, possession, storage and … and relied on 110 documents being Exhibits D-1 to D-111.7. Prosecution alleged that methyl alcohol which is a poisonous substance used to be brought from Karnataka and mixed with Ethyl alcohol. At times, this concoction was mixed … 55 (a) (g) (h) (i) , 57A and 58 of the Abkari Act. We need not refer to the punishments awarded to all these accused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1992

State of Maharashtra Through the Police Station Officer Vs. Prabhudaya ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-16-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 22, 221 and 235(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 306; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR410; (1993)95BOMLR31; I(1993)DMC137

prosecution are precisely as thus -On 28-4-1984 deceased Sangita, daughter of P.W. 8 Madanlal of Paratwada, district Amravati got married with Accused No. 2 Rajkumar … the dead body marked as Ex. 62. He thereafter drew inquest panchanama vide Ex. 64. P.W. 5 Bhanudas acted as a panch. P.W. 9 Mundhe since convinced that it being a case of murder, lodged a report … is directed against the finding of acquittal recorded in favour of original accused/respondents for the offences punishable under section 302, 498-A, 201 read with section 34 as well as under section 306 read with section 34 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1961

The Collector of Customs, Madras Vs. Nathella Sampathu Chetty and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-25-1961

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 1(3) and 8; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 14 and 178A; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 132(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1962SC316; 1983LC2198D(SC); [1961]3SCR786; MANU/SC/0089/1961

sort might be reasonable in respect of goods which are dangerous or noxious per se, like firearms or poison, since ordinarily people might be expected to be on their guard before obtaining such goods to ensure that … for the word 'shall' therein the word 'may' were substituted. ' 11. Turning now to the Sea Customs Act. section 167(8) enacts : '167. The offences mentioned in the first column of the following schedule shall be punishable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1996

Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-1996

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 48A and 51A; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 24(1), 25(1), 33 and 33A; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) (Amendment) Act, 1988; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 to 5

Reported in : AIR1996SC1446; (1996)3GLR272; JT1996(2)SC196; 1996(5)SCALE412; (1996)3SCC212; [1996]2SCR503

note of the statements made on behalf of Respondents Nos. 4 to 8 that they have completely stopped the manufacture of 'H' acid in their … provides that 'subject to the provisions of this section, (a) no person shall knowingly cause or permit any poisonous, noxious or polluting matter determined in accordance with such standards as may be laid down by the State … culprit. Respondent No. 9 denied any responsibility therefore. The immediate concern, said the Court, was the appropriate remedial action. The report of the R.P.C.B. presented a disturbing picture. It stated that the respondents have deliberately spread the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1957

Hukum Chand Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Poisons Act, 1919 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Poisons Rules - Rule 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342 and 439

Reported in : AIR1957All705; 1957CriLJ1191

time of his death, there was in his possession a number of poisons viz., Sankhya 2 Tolas. Singya 8 1/4 Tolas, Kuchla 44 Tolas, Ras Kapoor 16 1/2 Tolas, Mansal 4 1/2 Tolas Dai Chikna 9-6/16 Tolas … ORDERBeg, J.1. This is a revision by one Hukum Chand who was prosecuted under Section 6 of the poisons Act (Act No. XII of 1919) for being in possession of a number of poisons without any licence for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial