Advanced Search Results

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said

Shrishail Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 with adequate default sentences. He also recommended payment of the compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the victim as per … IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- for the offence - 7 - NC:2023. KHC-K:9388 CRL.A No.200241 of 2023 punishable under Section 376(3) of IPC and also Rigorous Imprisonment for

Shahees Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

all against the accused to sustain the conviction. 16. Even to raise the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012, there are no fundamental facts available to give a rise to such presumption. At any rate, in our … a case in Crime No.2 of 2013 under Sections 324, 354, 376, 511, 506(ii) of IPC and Sections 7 r/w 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 against the accused and the juvenile

Mrs Mary Paul Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

in Cr.No.73/2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 354 and 376 of I.P.C. besides under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Having gone through the material allegations that were secured by the Investigating Officer during the course of the … has taken me through the role played by accused No.3/ petitioner relating to the charge-sheet laid by the 7 Investigating Officer contended that there are no ingredients to constitute the offences lugged against this accused and do

Surya @ Jaya Surya vs State Rep by the

Court : Chennai

of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo SI for 1 month. 9(g)(i) r/w 10 POCSO To undergo RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default to Act, 2012 undergo SI for 1 year. … him for the offences under Sections 451 and 354 of IPC and Section 9 (g), (i) r/w 10of POCSO Act 2012 and Section 376(D) r/w 511 and Section 5(g), (i) r/w 6 r/w 18 of POCSO Act 2012 and

Prathosh Vs State Rep. by its

Court : Chennai

366 IPC, 67(B) of IT Act and Sections 7 r/w 8 & 11(iv) r/w 12 of POCSO Act, 2012.3. The case of the prosecution is that the 2nd respondent/de facto complainant and his wife are employees in … in Spl.S.C. No. 182 of 2022 on the file of Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Chennai and accept the compromise memo and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.M. Shimiyon Edwin For Respondents … No. 2 of 2022).2. Nagapooshanam3. Nithya ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for records in Spl.S.C. No. 182 of

Govind Shivkumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

354, 354A, 370, 504 and 509 of IPC r/w Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 r/w Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The learned Sessions Judge refers the matter for … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP., FOR R-1; SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL. CC. No.138/2022 C/W SPL CC No.982/2019 ARISING OUT OF

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Rangaswamy @ Manja

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

under Sections 366A, 344, 376 of the IPC, 1980 and for offences under Section 5(j)(ii) and 5(l) of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC. This appeal has been filed by the State seeking to set-aside … P1 stating that his daughter / victim whose date of birth was 30.05.1997 and who had studied upto 7th Std and thereafter discontinued her studies, was residing with her parents. During January 2014, the complainant / PW-1

Sethunath vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

offences punishable under Section 9(n) and 9(l) and 11(iii) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(for short ‘POCSO Act’) and convicted and sentenced respectively to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay … and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of `25,000/- under Section 12 of the POCSO Act. Fine amount of `1,00,000/- on realisation was directed to be given to PW1 as compensation under Section 357

Vasu V.B., S/O.Balan, C.No.163/16 vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

prosecution. According to her the inordinate delay occurred being unexplained, credence cannot be given to the prosecution case.10. POCSO Act, 2012 came into force only on 14.11.2012 and the incident was allegedly occurred in the month of August2012. According … is the sole accused in the said case. He was chargesheeted by Mananthavady police for offences punishable under Sections 376(1) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'theIPC') and Section 5(l) read with