Advanced Search Results
Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state
Delhi
Dec-09-2016
Land Acquisition
the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … dated 5th January, 2016, separate punishments were awarded against the appellant for offences punishable under Section 376 IPC, Section 6 POCSO Act, Section 354 IPC and Section 506 IPC. In addition, the trial judge directed compensation to be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiddu Vs. The State, through Hulsoor P.S., represented by Addl. State ...
Karnataka Kalaburagi
Apr-23-2016
Education
dated 22.04.2015. The Learned Special Judge in the said case has passed an order under Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 holding that the petitioner is aged more than 18 years as on the date of the alleged offence … Therefore, the police have laid the charge sheet under Section 376(f) and 506 of IPC and also under Section-6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 4. At the earlier stages, ie., vide order dated 11.08.2014, the learned Special
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunachalam Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Tiruvarur
Chennai
Jul-13-2016
Land Acquisition
from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Section 376(2)(n) of IPC, alternatively, under Section 6 read with 5(1) of POCSO Act, 2012 and 506(ii) of IPC. By judgment dated 21.07.2014, the trial court convicted the accused for offence under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kumar Ghimirey Vs. The State of Sikkim
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-2019
Land Acquisition
of POCSO Act, 2012 has been converted into sentence under Section 5(m) of the POCSO Act read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentence has been enhanced from seven years to ten years with fine of … 2015 filed by the appellant questioning the order of conviction and sentence dated 31.01.2014 passed by the Special Judge(POCSO Act, 2012)convicting the appellant under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO Act, 2012), Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurya @ Jaya Surya vs State Rep by the
Chennai
Feb-10-2026
him for the offences under Sections 451 and 354 of IPC and Section 9 (g), (i) r/w 10of POCSO Act 2012 and Section 376(D) r/w 511 and Section 5(g), (i) r/w 6 r/w 18 of POCSO Act 2012 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Sankara Varman Vs. State represented by the Inspector of Police, Ch ...
Chennai
Jun-30-2016
Education
and 506(II) IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for brevity the POCSO Act ), 2012. Charges were framed against the accused and the victim girl (P.W.1) was examined in chief on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSelvam @ Ramasamy Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Erode ...
Chennai
Jul-12-2016
Criminal
fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to under simple imprisonment for two years for offence under section 6 of the POCSO Act. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case … hereby confirmed. Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - Section 9 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012- Section 6 - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 313, Section 374 - Indian Penal Code - Section 366 Appeal
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal @ Gopalakrishnan Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, ...
Chennai
Jul-13-2016
Education
offences under Sections 370 and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act) (later the said charge was altered into one under Section 6 of … fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three years for offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs Mary Paul Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Oct-12-2020
Education
in Cr.No.73/2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 354 and 376 of I.P.C. besides under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Having gone through the material allegations that were secured by the Investigating Officer during the course of the … It is the case of the complainant that based on the statement given by the child, when the 6 accused Nos.1 and 2 were called upon to appear before the Committee, they have admitted about the commission
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Shatrughna Baban Meshram and ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Oct-12-2015
Criminal
to death, convicting for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) and sentencing to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default, to … 01 of 2015 arises out of the reference by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Special Case (POCSO Act) No. 11 of 2013 for confirmation of the death sentence awarded to original accused. 2. The appellant/original accused
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »