Advanced Search Results

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … (P.W.1) as well as in the body of the Accused, atleast on the face, bare hands and legs. 5. Advancing his argument, it is represented on behalf of the Appellant that the trial Court had incorrectly held

Karam Abdul Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 498A, 354, 376, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(m) and (l) r/w Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, are 9 invoked. The case is now registered as Spl.C.C.No.356/2017. The parents of the petitioner along with the

Mr Hrishikesh Sahoo Vs. State Of Karnataka By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 498A, 354, 376, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(m) and (l) r/w Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, are 9 invoked. The case is now registered as Spl.C.C.No.356/2017. The parents of the petitioner along with the

Xxxxx @ Xxxxx Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 498A, 354, 376, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(m) and (l) r/w Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, are 9 invoked. The case is now registered as Spl.C.C.No.356/2017. The parents of the petitioner along with the

Mrs. Xxxxx @ Xxxxx Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Sections 498A, 354, 376, 506 of the IPC and Sections 5(m) and (l) r/w Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, are 9 invoked. The case is now registered as Spl.C.C.No.356/2017. The parents of the petitioner along with the

Shahees Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

all against the accused to sustain the conviction. 16. Even to raise the presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, 2012, there are no fundamental facts available to give a rise to such presumption. At any rate, in our … of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Chennai. He stood charged for offences under Sections 376(f)(g), 324 and 506(i) of IPC and Sections 5(g) and 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [In

Surya @ Jaya Surya vs State Rep by the

Court : Chennai

him for the offences under Sections 451 and 354 of IPC and Section 9 (g), (i) r/w 10of POCSO Act 2012 and Section 376(D) r/w 511 and Section 5(g), (i) r/w 6 r/w 18 of POCSO Act 2012 and

Shrishail Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 with adequate default sentences. He also recommended payment of the compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the victim as per … memo as per Ex.P22. On 29.10.2019, the medical termination of the pregnancy was done at Bidar Institute - 5 - NC:2023. KHC-K:9388 CRL.A No.200241 of 2023 of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Bidar and the sample of foetus

Iqbal @ Bala Vs. State Of U. P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

offence under Sections 376, 323, 354 (A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 7 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 is clearly not made out against the Petitioners. The allegations in the FIR are vague as there is … and Afjal (sons of the appellant No.1 i.e. Accused No.3, 4 and 5 respectively) used to misbehave and outrage her modesty. It is further alleged … declined to quash the First Information Report (FIR) No.122 of 2022 dated 21.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323 and 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 7 and 8 of the Protection

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … judge more than once.4. As we shall also see elaborately in due course, the graver offence defined by Section 5 of POCSO Act (“aggravated penetrative sexual assault”), punishable under Section 6, though mentioned in the order of cognizance,