Advanced Search Results
Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state
Delhi
Dec-09-2016
Land Acquisition
the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … years but which may extend to imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine‖. (Emphasis supplied) 44. In terms of Section 28(1) POCSO Act, a “court of sessions” is notified and designated as ―special court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarmeet Singh vs State of Gnct Delhi and Anr.
Delhi
Apr-16-2026
MRTP
(„BNS‟) and section 6 of the ProtectionSigning W.P.(CRL) 1985/2025 Page 1 of 37 of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 („POCSO Act‟) at P.S.: Malviya Nagar, South Delhi.3. The petition is premised on the „consent‟ of the complainant, … was „minor‟ i.e., below the age of 18 years, for which reason an offence under section 6 of the POCSO Act has also been alleged against the petitioner.4. Though otherwise, the matter is based on the consent of the … Gujarat HC2. married subsequent to FIR Gujarat 01.04.2026 (prosecutrix then major); CR.MA- 4402/2026 parties cohabiting; quashed FIR lodged at the instance of Abhishek vs. State
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunita Devi Vs. The State Of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
May-17-2024
Right to Information
and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “POCSO Act, 2012”) read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred … the decision of their Lordships' Board in 5 Rang. 53 [(‘26) 5 Rang. 53 :14. A.I.R. 1927 P.C. 44 :54 I.A. 96 :100. I.C. 227 (P.C.), Abdul Rahman v. Emperor]., where failure to comply with Ss. 360,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State Of Karnataka Vs. Shankar Urf Shankrappa S/o Ramppa Hubballi
Karnataka Dharwad
Apr-22-2022
Criminal
to as ‘IPC’ for short) and Sections 4 and 5(L) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offices Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘POCSO Act’, for short). According 3 to prosecution on 21.05.2014, the victim came to … FOR OFFENCE P/U/S51) OF POCSO ACT, IN S.C.NO.44/2014 DATED2603.2018 AND TO SENTENCE THE2RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S51) OF THE POCSO ACT I.E., LESS THAN TEN YEARS BUT WHICH MAY EXTEND TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE AND SHALL ALSO BE LIABLE … BADAMIKAR, J.PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The State has filed this appeal under Section 377(1) (b) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Swamy B Vs. State By T N Pura Police Station
Karnataka
Sep-15-2022
Land Acquisition
Cr. No.070/2021 of T.Narsipura Police Station U/s 376 (2) (I) (N) IPC and section 5 (J)(II)(L). 6 of POCSO Act 2012, vide letter under reference 1 were received in the laboratory for examination on 01.03.2021 through CPC376 Sri Mahadeva … Krishan Kumar [Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana, (2011) 7 SCC130: (2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 61]. (para 44), Section 53-A really “facilitates the prosecution to prove its case”. A positive result of the DNA test would
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJust Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2024
Right to Information
morals and therefore has committed a cognizable offense under Section 67 (B) IT ACT & 15 (1) of the POCSO Act 2012. [...].” B. IMPUGNED ORDER9 Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the respondent No.1 went before the High Court of Judicature … to attract the offence under Section 67B of the IT Act, Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 44 of 199 the videos or material has to be voluntarily downloaded into any device. In other words, there
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Of Karnataka By Vs. Gireesh
Karnataka
Feb-09-2024
Land Acquisition
and she was a minor and she comes under the definition of “child” as per the provisions of POCSO Act 2012.46. In this case, PWs-1, 2, 11, 12, and 15 are material witnesses. Other witnesses, who are related to … Shri P Nataraju, Advocate for R3 to R6; R7 is served) 3 Crl.A.No.873/2017 This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C. praying to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal … Section 94(2) of Juvenile Justice Act 2015 shall 3 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 442 4 (2013) 7 SCC2635 (2013) 14 SCC6376 (2022) 8 SCC60226 Crl.A.No.873/2017 be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr T B Chandrashekar Vs. State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-02-2023
Land Acquisition
.. v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT1 has held as follows: “82. Furthermore, Section 19(1) of the POCSO Act requires that any person, including a child, who has knowledge of the commission of an offence punishable under … MANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S5J)(II), 5(L), 5(Q), 6, 21 OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 SECTION376 376(2)(H), 376(2)(N), 376(3), 201, 313 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC1860AGAINST THE PETITIONER, WHICH IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AS
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYallappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka Kalaburagi
Apr-06-2023
Criminal
fine, he shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Further acting under section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and according to the guideline NO.12 of NALSA’s compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/Other Crimes, 2018, … along with him. He went behind the Anganawadi school and sat with the deceased on the canal bund.-. 44 - NC:2023. KHC-K:3808 CRL.A No.200069 of 2020 C/W CRL.RC.NO.200001 of 2020 68. In the cross-examination directed to some
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Of Karnataka Vs. Kiran S/o Mailareppa Dandennavar
Karnataka Dharwad
Apr-17-2023
Education
376 of IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the POCSO Act, 2012’) and secured the presence of accused for trial. The accused pleaded not guilty of the charges. The prosecution … FSL report in respect of M.O.1 to 11 and receiving hand writing experts opinion as per Ex.P.35 and 44, has charge sheeted the accused. 18 Crl.A.No.100442/2019 24. As we noticed from FSL reports at Ex.P.35 and 44,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »