Advanced Search Results

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … conviction warrant also observed that he was accepting the personal bond (“PB”) that had been furnished under Section 437A Cr. PC. FACTS BEYOND DISPUTE6 The substantial part of the evidence adduced by the prosecution at the trial

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

motivation relating to the complaint lodged by her parents in regard to the pathway against the Appellant/A1's family. 43. One cannot ignore the ingredients of Section 7 of POCSO Act, 2012 which defines the offence of 'Sexual … 7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

morals and therefore has committed a cognizable offense under Section 67 (B) IT ACT & 15 (1) of the POCSO Act 2012. [...].” B. IMPUGNED ORDER9 Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the respondent No.1 went before the High Court of Judicature … Section 67B of the IT Act. When the final report came Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 43 of 199 to be filed, the offence under Section 15 of the POCSO was dropped, and chargesheet was

State Of Karnataka By Vs. Gireesh

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

and she was a minor and she comes under the definition of “child” as per the provisions of POCSO Act 2012.46. In this case, PWs-1, 2, 11, 12, and 15 are material witnesses. Other witnesses, who are related to … an attempt to determine the age of the victim on guess work 43 Crl.A.No.873/2017 by learned Trial Judge in the impugned judgment is totally contrary … Shri P Nataraju, Advocate for R3 to R6; R7 is served) 3 Crl.A.No.873/2017 This Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C. praying to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal

Yallappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Criminal

fine, he shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Further acting under section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and according to the guideline NO.12 of NALSA’s compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/Other Crimes, 2018, … with deceased giving food and fruits to her and coming out of the house along with the deceased.-. 43 - NC:2023. KHC-K:3808 CRL.A No.200069 of 2020 C/W CRL.RC.NO.200001 of 2020 Thereafter, searching of the deceased, information furnished

Shambhu Yadav vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Additionally, further compensation of Rs.4 lakhs has been granted in favour of the victim under Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Rule 7 (2) of the POCSO Rules, 2012. Having regard to the nature of the crime

Chand Bibi vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

leave to assail the judgment dated 04.01.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, (Designated Special Court Under the POCSO Act’ 2012) South East District, New Delhi in Case No.1385/16, Sessions Case No.212/13, arising out of FIR No.673/2013 registered at … Delhi in Case No.1385/16, Sessions Case No.212/13, arising out of FIR No.673/2013 registered at Police Station- Govindpuri under Sections 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has acquitted … I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Crl. A. Nos. 592/2018 & 594/2018 Page 1 of 43 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeals have been preferred by the complainant-

State vs.akram

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

leave to assail the judgment dated 04.01.2017 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, (Designated Special Court Under the POCSO Act’ 2012) South East District, New Delhi in Case No.1385/16, Sessions Case No.212/13, arising out of FIR No.673/2013 registered at … Delhi in Case No.1385/16, Sessions Case No.212/13, arising out of FIR No.673/2013 registered at Police Station- Govindpuri under Sections 376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.2. By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has acquitted … I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Crl. A. Nos. 592/2018 & 594/2018 Page 1 of 43 VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeals have been preferred by the complainant-

The State Of Karnataka Vs. Rangaswamy @ Manja

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

under Sections 366A, 344, 376 of the IPC, 1980 and for offences under Section 5(j)(ii) and 5(l) of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC. This appeal has been filed by the State seeking to set-aside … devoid of merits. In terms of the aforesaid reasons and findings, we proceed to pass the following: - 43 - CRL.A No.1925 of 2016 ORDER The appeal preferred by the appellant / State under Section 378(1) and

Murugan Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

under Sections 332 (c ), 115 (2), 75 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 9(i) r/w 10 of POCSO Act, 2012, (Corresponding Sections 451, 323, 354 (A) of IPC) in Crime No.43 of 2025, registered on the file of