Advanced Search Results

M. Loganathan Vs. State rep. By Inspector of Police, Erode District

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 376(1), Section 377 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Conviction Trial Court convicted and sentenced accused-Appellant for offences punishable under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … recorded on 10.01.2014 put the appellant on trial on charge for offences under Sections 354,376,506 IPC read with Section 4 of POCSO Act. On the conclusion of trial, the impugned judgment dated 15th October, 2015 was passed holding

Saranya Vs. State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Per ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

294(b) IPC Charge-4 against A1 to A4 u/s 506(i) IPC Charge-5 against A1 u/s 5(j)(ii) r/w 6 of POCSO Act 2012 Charge-6 against A1 to A5 u/s 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - for arranging the … 417, 376, 294(b) and 506(i) code of Crminal Procedure, 1973 Section 349 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Sections 9, 10 and 11 Section 349 Oaths Act, 1969 Section 8

Gopal @ Gopalakrishnan Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

offences under Sections 370 and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as POCSO Act) (later the said charge was altered into one under Section 6 of … fine of Rs.1000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three years for offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Challenging the said conviction and sentence, the appellant is before this Court with this appeal. 2. The case

Shravan vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Signed CRL.M.C. 1352/2026 & CRL.M.C. 2768/2025 1seeks quashing of FIR No. 262/2016 dated 16.04.2016, under Sections Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.3. As per the broad allegations contained in abovesaid FIR, two sisters i.e.Miss T (child) and Ms. C {names … petitioner-Shravan and heDigitally Signed CRL.M.C. 1352/2026 & CRL.M.C. 2768/2025 1seeks quashing of FIR No. 262/2016 dated 16.04.2016, under Sections Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.3. As per the broad allegations contained in abovesaid FIR, two sisters i.e.Miss T … any such enquiry.(MANOJ JAIN)JUDGEFEBRUARY 18, 2026/sw/ss/sa/pbDigitally Signed CRL.M.C. 1352/2026 & CRL.M.C. 2768/2025 4

Purushothaman Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

of 2026 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act - 2012, Vellore, Vellore District dated 20.02.2026.For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Addl. Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Original … The petitioner/accused, who is facing trial in Spl.S.C.No.146 of2026 for the offences under Sections 9(m) and 10 of the POCSO Act, had earlier filed a petition seeking recall of P.W.2/victim girl. The said petition came to be dismissed by … Police Station, Vellore District. Cr.No.19/2025. ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.41 of

Vasu V.B., S/O.Balan, C.No.163/16 vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

prosecution. According to her the inordinate delay occurred being unexplained, credence cannot be given to the prosecution case.10. POCSO Act, 2012 came into force only on 14.11.2012 and the incident was allegedly occurred in the month of August2012. According … (1) IPC though he was convicted thereunder, invoking the power under Section 42 of POCSO Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 … is the sole accused in the said case. He was chargesheeted by Mananthavady police for offences punishable under Sections 376(1) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'theIPC') and Section 5(l) read with

Kumar Ghimirey Vs. The State of Sikkim

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Officer­in­Charge of the PS i.e., Sub­Inspector(SI).5. A chargesheet was submitted under Section 376/511/341/342 of IPC read with Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012. Learned Special Judge framed charges under Section 341 of IPC and under Section 5 … 2015 filed by the appellant questioning the order of conviction and sentence dated 31.01.2014 passed by the Special Judge(POCSO Act, 2012)convicting the appellant under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO Act, 2012), Section

Vijayakumar vs Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

by which he was convicted for the offence under Section 366 of the IPC and Section 6(1) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and sentenced as follows: Offence under Section Sentence imposed 366 IPC To undergo RI for ten years and

N. Ravindra Kumar Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiru ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment passed by the learned Special Judge under the POCSO Act, 2012 Principal Sessions Judge, Puducherry in Spl.S.C.No.1 of 2015 dated 07.08.2015.) S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The appellant, the sole … seven years and pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (for each count) for offence punishable under Section 18 r/w Section 4 of the POCSO Act would meet the ends of justice. 18. In the result, the appeal is partly