Advanced Search Results

Siddu Vs. The State, through Hulsoor P.S., represented by Addl. State ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Education

dated 22.04.2015. The Learned Special Judge in the said case has passed an order under Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 holding that the petitioner is aged more than 18 years as on the date of the alleged offence

Dr.shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sections 376(2)(n), 376DA, 376(3), 201, 506 r/w 34 & 37 of the IPC, Section 5(L) & 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’ for short), Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(v)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (‘the

Dr. Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Sections 376(2)(n), 376DA, 376(3), 201, 506 r/w 34 & 37 of the IPC, Section 5(L) & 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’ for short), Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii), 3(2)(v)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (‘the

State Of Karnataka By Vs. Gireesh

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judge, Mysuru in S.C.No.25/2014 acquitting the respondents of the offences punishable under Sections 366, 376, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 4, 6, 21 of POCSO Act. This Criminal Appeal coming on for Further Arguments … and she was a minor and she comes under the definition of “child” as per the provisions of POCSO Act 2012.46. In this case, PWs-1, 2, 11, 12, and 15 are material witnesses. Other witnesses, who are related to

Siddu @ Siddeshwar S/O Bhagwanrao Mane Vs. The State Through Hulsoor p ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Education

dated 22.04.2015. The Learned Special Judge in the said case has passed an order under Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 holding that the petitioner is aged more than 18 years as on the date of the alleged offence

Court on Its Own Motion vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

in behaviour. In such a situation, when the child finally discloses abuse, and a report is filed under the POCSO Act, 2012 more information will have to be gathered so that the child‟s statement may be recorded. Information so obtained … fees as may be prescribed to record the evidence of the child.” 34. Rule 3(5) requires that the “sign language interpreters, Special educators and experts … to be considered are succinctly set out therein, we extract the reference made by the ld. Judge under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in extenso which reads as follows : “(1) This Board

Shrishail Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Subject : Land Acquisition

In this regard, he relied on the judgment in the case of P.YUVAPRAKASH (Supra), wherein, the provisions of Section 34 of the POCSO Act, 2012 was discussed in length and it was held that the Courts have to … for 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 with adequate default sentences. He also recommended payment of the compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- to the victim as per

Shridhar S/O Ningappa Saravand vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 363, 366, 109 AND 376(2)(N) R/W. 34 OF IPC AND U/SEC. 4, 6 AND 17 OF POCSO ACT 2012. -2-THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDERWAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:ORAL ORDER(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE … DAY, ORDERWAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:ORAL ORDER(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI) This petition is filed under Section 439 of CriminalProcedure Code (‘CrPC’ for short) for grant of regular bail in Crime no.59/2023 by Haveri Women

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … was 19.10.2000 and during the academic year 2014-15, she was studying IX Std and the police enquired her. 34. P.W.9 (the Investigating Officer) of All Women Police Station, Ariyalur, in her evidence had deposed that on 06.07.2014

Rajeesh @ Unnimon vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short “PoCSO Act''). In view of the provisions of Section 34(2) of the PoCSO Act, age of a victim has to be determined by the court after satisfying itself about the age. The