Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the pocso act 2012 section 33 · Page 1 of about 242 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2026

Minor Child K & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners pray for passing of further directions/guidelines that in proceedings under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [hereafter ‗POCSO Act‘], where repeated adjournments sought by the accused or their counsel delay the examination of minor … .................................................................... 11 A. Vulnerable Witnesses in Criminal Justice System: Scope and Judicial Approach ............................................................................................................ 11 B. Safeguards under the POCSO Act to Protect Child Victims During Trial ...................................................................................................................... 18 C. Use of Video Conferencing for Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses............................................................................................................. … to ensurethat the participation of a child victim in the criminal trial does not result in further trauma. Section 33(5) of the POCSO Act mandates that the Special Court shall ensure that the child is not called repeatedly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2026

Purushothaman Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-2026

of 2026 on the file of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act - 2012, Vellore, Vellore District dated 20.02.2026.For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Addl. Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Original … The petitioner/accused, who is facing trial in Spl.S.C.No.146 of2026 for the offences under Sections 9(m) and 10 of the POCSO Act, had earlier filed a petition seeking recall of P.W.2/victim girl. The said petition came to be dismissed by … concerned, the trial Court declined the request by placing reliance on Section 33(5) of the POCSO Act, which mandates that the child should not be … Police Station, Vellore District. Cr.No.19/2025. ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.41 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2020

Basappa @ Basavaraj S/o Chandappa Ukkali Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Aug-25-2020

Subject : Criminal

Addl. Sessions & Special Judge, Vijayapur (‘Special Court’, hereafter).2. The appellant was facing charges under Sections 5(m) of POCSO Act, 2012 which is punishable under Section 376 of IPC read with Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section … completed on 10.11.2016 itself. The learned Special Public Prosecutor had violated the mandatory provision which is enunciated in Section 33 of the POCSO Act. Sub-section 5 of Section 33 of the Act 15 stipulates that the Special Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2023

Kerala State Legal Services Authority, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-01-2023

Section 11, read with Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, the POCSO Act), apart from the offences under the Indian Penal Code (for short, the IPC). Section 11 of the POCSO … in both cases, granted interim compensation of `50,000/- to each victim invoking section 357A of Cr. P.C, Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act and Rule 9(1) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (for short,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2023

XXX vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-16-2023

376 of IPC, Sections 3(b), 4, 5 (i) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, POCSO Act) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice-:4:-(Care and Protection of Children) Act (for short, … Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused under Sections 3(b) r/w 4 and 5 (i) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 75 of the JJ Act. Apart from the substantive sentence, a total fine amount of `75,000/- … Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (for short, POCSO Rules) r/w Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act.4. The petitioner in Crl. M.C No.8718/2022 was themother

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2023

XXX vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-16-2023

376 of IPC, Sections 3(b), 4, 5 (i) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, POCSO Act) and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice-:4:-(Care and Protection of Children) Act (for short, … Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused under Sections 3(b) r/w 4 and 5 (i) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 75 of the JJ Act. Apart from the substantive sentence, a total fine amount of `75,000/- … Children from Sexual Offences Rules, 2020 (for short, POCSO Rules) r/w Section 33(8) of the POCSO Act.4. The petitioner in Crl. M.C No.8718/2022 was themother

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2024

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-23-2024

Subject : Right to Information

morals and therefore has committed a cognizable offense under Section 67 (B) IT ACT & 15 (1) of the POCSO Act 2012. [...].” B. IMPUGNED ORDER9 Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the respondent No.1 went before the High Court of Judicature … heinous crimes and need to be effectively addressed”. [...].” (Emphasis supplied) Criminal Appeal Nos. 2161-2162 of 2024 Page 33 of 19953. In Attorney General for India v. Satish reported in 2021 INSC762this Court had the occasion to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2018

Court on Its Own Motion vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2018

Subject : Education

in behaviour. In such a situation, when the child finally discloses abuse, and a report is filed under the POCSO Act, 2012 more information will have to be gathered so that the child‟s statement may be recorded. Information so obtained … to be considered are succinctly set out therein, we extract the reference made by the ld. Judge under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in extenso which reads as follows : “(1) This Board … 26(1)]., at the time of medical examination [Section 27(3)]., in Court [Section 33(4) and 33(7)]., and to act as a support person for assistance the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2023

Yallappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Apr-06-2023

Subject : Criminal

fine, he shall undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Further acting under section 33(8) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and according to the guideline NO.12 of NALSA’s compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/Other Crimes, 2018,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial