Advanced Search Results

Anandan vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

by which he was convicted for the offence under Sections 376 of the IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to … filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in connection with the Spl SC No. 27 of 2019 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court (POCSO) casesThiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District and set

Court on Its Own Motion vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

in behaviour. In such a situation, when the child finally discloses abuse, and a report is filed under the POCSO Act, 2012 more information will have to be gathered so that the child‟s statement may be recorded. Information so obtained … to be considered are succinctly set out therein, we extract the reference made by the ld. Judge under Section 395(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in extenso which reads as follows : “(1) This Board … police or Magistrate [Section 26(1)]., at the time of medical examination [Section 27(3)]., in Court [Section 33(4) and 33(7)]., and to act as a support

Saranya Vs. State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Per ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

294(b) IPC Charge-4 against A1 to A4 u/s 506(i) IPC Charge-5 against A1 u/s 5(j)(ii) r/w 6 of POCSO Act 2012 Charge-6 against A1 to A5 u/s 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - for arranging the … 417, 376, 294(b) and 506(i) code of Crminal Procedure, 1973 Section 349 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Sections 9, 10 and 11 Section 349 Oaths Act, 1969 Section … 6. Prema, a 21 year old village belle and Manikandan, aged about 27 years, were neck deep in love some time around 2011 onwards. It

Sitab Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

either made by the prosecutrix or the father or mother of the prosecutrix/victim.31. The appellant further contends that Section 27 of the POCSO Act, 2012 was also not complied with in as much as the minor child was … a wholly tutored testimony and that there had been non-compliance of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the POCSO Act, 2012.2. Notice of the appeal was issued to the State and vide order dated 17.10.2017 qua Criminal M. B.

Govind Shivkumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

354, 354A, 370, 504 and 509 of IPC r/w Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 r/w Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The learned Sessions Judge refers the matter for … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP., FOR R-1; SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL. CC. No.138/2022 C/W SPL CC No.982/2019 ARISING OUT OF … by the 2nd respondent. Not stopping at that, the 2nd respondent on 27-05-2019 filed Guardian and Wards case in G & WC No.149 of 2019

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … had not seen the Appellant/Accused before and she brought her daughter (P.W.1) to the house and enquired her. 27. Apart from the above, P.W.2 adds in her evidence that prior to the lodging of complaint, on the

Palanisamy Vs State rep. by,

Court : Chennai

Under Section Sentence 11(i), 11(iii), 11(iv) r/w Section 12 of R.I for 3 years and fine of Rs.5,000/-, POCSO Act, 2012 I/d undergo S.I for 6 months3. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has preferred Crl.A.No.222 of 2026 before … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.A.No.222 of 2026 Palanisamy ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. State rep. By The Inspector of

Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf Vs. State (Govt. Of Nct of De ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

pertains to interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “the POCSO Act”), and the primary argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the definition in Section 2(d) … a child by Magistrate; additional provisions regarding statement to be recorded and medical examination of a child. 23. Section 27 stipulates that medical examination of a child in respect of whom any offence has been committed under the

The State of Uttar Pradesh versus Anurudh & Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 770

of the High Court which collectively prescribe that medical determination of age under Section 164-A CrPC read with Section 27 POCSO Act is mandatory and is often a more reliable indicator than documentary entries. Reliance on Pradeep Kumar … the High Court could have issued directions, mandating age determination test to be conducted in all cases involving the POCSO Act. This larger question involves twin considerations, one on the aspect of jurisdiction and the other on the aspect … Procedure, 1973 - s.439 - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.363, 366 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - ss.7 and 8 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act 2015 - s.94 - Allegation of the

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … are dealing in the matter at hand provide a ready illustration on the subject. Crl. A. No.538/2016 Page 27 of 72 47. We must also refer here to Section 220 Cr.P.C. which permits a common trial for