Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the pocso act 2012 section 26 · Page 1 of about 652 results (0.061 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 04 2018

Court on Its Own Motion vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2018

Subject : Education

in behaviour. In such a situation, when the child finally discloses abuse, and a report is filed under the POCSO Act, 2012 more information will have to be gathered so that the child‟s statement may be recorded. Information so obtained … of third party intervention in police investigations involving children.9. It is also essential to consider the mandate of Section 26 of the POCSO Act which reads as follows : “26. Additional provisions regarding statement to be recorded.- (1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2019

The State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.om Prakash

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-2019

Subject : Criminal

PS - Badarpur under Sections 363/354A IPC and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO), acquitting the respondent/accused of the charge framed against him. Crl.A. No.593/2018 Page 1 of 24 2. The … uncle/person (accused) as a little bit dark and bald. After her statement was recorded, sections 3IPC, 8 of the POCSO Act were added, and the investigation was handed Crl.A. No.593/2018 Page 3 of 24 over to IO/SI Sarita (PW-7). … the learned Trial Court framed the charges, vide order on charge dated 26.08.2014, under the same sections.3. The factual matrix emerging from the record is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2024

Govind Shivkumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-06-2024

Subject : Right to Information

354, 354A, 370, 504 and 509 of IPC r/w Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 r/w Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The learned Sessions Judge refers the matter for … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP., FOR R-1; SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL. CC. No.138/2022 C/W SPL CC No.982/2019 ARISING OUT OF … complainant. The 2nd respondent and Smt. Shruthi Cauvery Iyer got married on 26-04-2007. On 06-05-2008 a child is born from the wedlock. On 17-04-2017, on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 24 2016

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-24-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … she was medically examined and also she rendered evidence before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Jayamkondam about the incidence. 26. P.W.2, mother of P.W.1 in her evidence had stated that P.W.1 is her younger daughter and last year,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2023

Mohammad Wajid Vs. State Of U.p.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-08-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

oppressive. In the present case, the FIR/Crime No.122/2022 U/s 376, 323, 354(A) IPC & Section 7, 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 was registered at P.S. Mahila Thana, District Saharanpur disclosed the glaring facts and there are serious allegations against … was registered against the Accused Iqbal in 1990 i.e. FIR No.57 of 1990 U/s 379, 411 IPC and Section 26 of Forest Act at Mirzapur Police Station. However, due to earlier Government(s) supports, no legal actions were taken

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2016

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … seventeenth Chapter of Cr.P.C. Section 218 requires a separate charge to be framed for Crl. A. No.538/2016 Page 26 of 72 “every distinct offence”. Section 211 requires every charge to “state the offence with which the accused

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2025

Sachin versus State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-21-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2500

imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- under Sections 9/10 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and under Section 341 IPC the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month by the … Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - ss.3(a), 4, 5(m), 6 - Penal Code, 1860 - ss.363-A, 376. [Paras 23, 26, 27, 29.1, 31-33, 34.4-37]Jurisdiction - Appellate jurisdiction and revisional jurisdiction - Difference between: 2502 [2025] 4 S.C.R.Supreme Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2023

Radha C.P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2023

M.A. 10056 of 2022, decided on 02.06.2022.-: 73 :- Another29 quashed the case against a man under the POCSO Act, 2012, for marrying a 16-year-old girl, observing that it would be an “injustice” to separate a “well-knitted family unit”. … 138 OF 2022 CRIME NO.393/2018 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANSAR AGED 26 YEARS S/O.HAMSAKOYA, ASSAINARUPURAKKAL HOUSE, VADIKKAL, KUTTAYI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENT/STATE … sexual offences against women and children be quashed upon a compromise between the accused and the victim, invoking section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure? - this is the common issue that falls into consideration in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2023

XXXXX vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2023

M.A. 10056 of 2022, decided on 02.06.2022.-: 73 :- Another29 quashed the case against a man under the POCSO Act, 2012, for marrying a 16-year-old girl, observing that it would be an “injustice” to separate a “well-knitted family unit”. … 138 OF 2022 CRIME NO.393/2018 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANSAR AGED 26 YEARS S/O.HAMSAKOYA, ASSAINARUPURAKKAL HOUSE, VADIKKAL, KUTTAYI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENT/STATE … sexual offences against women and children be quashed upon a compromise between the accused and the victim, invoking section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure? - this is the common issue that falls into consideration in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2023

X vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-24-2023

M.A. 10056 of 2022, decided on 02.06.2022.-: 73 :- Another29 quashed the case against a man under the POCSO Act, 2012, for marrying a 16-year-old girl, observing that it would be an “injustice” to separate a “well-knitted family unit”. … 138 OF 2022 CRIME NO.393/2018 OF TIRUR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANSAR AGED 26 YEARS S/O.HAMSAKOYA, ASSAINARUPURAKKAL HOUSE, VADIKKAL, KUTTAYI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV P.T.SHEEJISH RESPONDENT/STATE … sexual offences against women and children be quashed upon a compromise between the accused and the victim, invoking section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure? - this is the common issue that falls into consideration in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial