Advanced Search Results

Sri Gangadharappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

been convicted for offences punishable under Section 376(2)(1) of the IPC, 1860 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and so also for offences under Section 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(v-a) of the SC & ST (POA) Act, 1989. … it is seen that the entire process has been completed by the Trial Judge within a span of 25 days. Further, even taking into consideration the date of commencement of recording evidence on the part of the

Govind Shivkumar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

354, 354A, 370, 504 and 509 of IPC r/w Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of POCSO Act, 2012 r/w Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The learned Sessions Judge refers the matter for … the child took away the prosecutrix with the help of 20 - 25 goons. This was brought to the notice of the Family Court by … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP., FOR R-1; SRI S.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN SPL. CC. No.138/2022 C/W SPL CC No.982/2019 ARISING OUT OF

Afzal vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

herein was convicted for the offences punishable under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years for the offence punishable under Section … at serial No.24 to 35 are as under:24. 919891099861 308309837861343 16:05:13 7:40:04 84 31602 New MOC3583104368 Seelampur 6300 25. 919891099861 3025917665597625 16:05:13 7:37:20 48 31602 New MOC3583104368 26. 919891099861 8860546998 16:05:13 6:59:07 42 16351 #N/A Seelampur 27.

Shameer @ Saji vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

No.846 of 2015 framed charge against accused persons under Section 370 and 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. On the side of the prosecution, PWs 1 to 15 were examined and Exhibits P1 to P17 were … KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.A NO. 324 OF 2017 CRIME NO.247/2014 OF KASABA POLICE

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … out of fear, gave a complaint before the All Women Police Station, Ariyalur about the happening of occurrence. 25. P.W.1 proceeds in her evidence that after lodging a complaint, she came along with her mother and that

Jafar Ali vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

No.846 of 2015 framed charge against accused persons under Section 370 and 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. On the side of the prosecution, PWs 1 to 15 were examined and Exhibits P1 to P17 were … KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.A NO. 324 OF 2017 CRIME NO.247/2014 OF KASABA POLICE

Faisal Alam @ Sharukh@Mota vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner was found guilty of offences under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and Sections 377/367/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment … mainly beendenied to the petitioner due to his conduct while in prison as well as his conviction under the POCSO Act, in view of Rule 1210(II) as well as Rule 1211(VII) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018. However, as … State and SI Rohitash Yadav, PS.: Neb Sarai.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 25.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of

Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf Vs. State (Govt. Of Nct of De ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

pertains to interpretation of Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “the POCSO Act”), and the primary argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the definition in Section 2(d) … device is permissible. This provision has its own sanctity. Section 37 deals with trials to be conducted in 25 camera and Section 38 provides assistance of an interpreter or expert while recording evidence of a child. Section

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … we may extract the said two penal clauses hereunder:-"―4. Punishment for penetrative sexual assault.- Crl. A. No.538/2016 Page 25 of 72 Whoever commits penetrative sexual assault shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term

Sachin versus State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2500

imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- under Sections 9/10 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and under Section 341 IPC the appellant was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one month by the … [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2500 : 2025 INSC 716Sachin v. State of Maharashtra (Criminal Appeal No(s). 2073-2075 of 2025) 21 April 2025 [B.V.