Advanced Search Results

Saranya Vs. State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Per ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

294(b) IPC Charge-4 against A1 to A4 u/s 506(i) IPC Charge-5 against A1 u/s 5(j)(ii) r/w 6 of POCSO Act 2012 Charge-6 against A1 to A5 u/s 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - for arranging the … 417, 376, 294(b) and 506(i) code of Crminal Procedure, 1973 Section 349 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Sections 9, 10 and 11 Section 349 Oaths Act, 1969 Section … [sister of Manikandan] and (4) Arumugam [relative of Manikandan]. 6. Prema, a 21 year old village belle and Manikandan, aged about 27 years, were neck

Kotresh J vs the State by

Court : Karnataka

under Sections 64(2)(m), 190, 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4, 6 and 17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 9 and 10 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, subject to the following conditions:a) The … JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7239 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. KOTRESH J. S/O LATE JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/O NEAR KOLLAPARUDAMMA TEMPLE KAVADIGARAHATTI CHITRADURGA-577 501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: Digitally signed by NANDINI

Christopher Jaswanth Raj vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

15 yearsand 5 months, but traces of consent militates against imposition of maximum sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. It is, therefore, limited interference with impugnedjudgment is warranted.Hence, we proceed to pass the following:-ORDERi. The appeal is … Therefore, the prosecution did not attempt to secure the Birth certificate or Ossification Test as required under - 21 -Section 34 of POCSO Act and 94 of Juvenile Justice Act. Under that context, CW.18, the Principal, who

Minor Child K & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners pray for passing of further directions/guidelines that in proceedings under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [hereafter ‗POCSO Act‘], where repeated adjournments sought by the accused or their counsel delay the examination of minor … .................................................................... 11 A. Vulnerable Witnesses in Criminal Justice System: Scope and Judicial Approach ............................................................................................................ 11 B. Safeguards under the POCSO Act to Protect Child Victims During Trial ...................................................................................................................... 18 C. Use of Video Conferencing for Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses............................................................................................................. … criminal justice process flows from the constitutional guarantees under Articles 14, 15(3), 21 and 39(f) of the Constitution of India. It is submitted that the … of the said complaint, the FIR bearing no. 153/2022 was registered under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter ‗IPC‘]. It is stated

Kottaisavarimuthu Vs The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

207 Cr.P.C.4.Thereafter, the Trial Court framed charges against the accused under Sections 9(l), (n), (r) and 10 of the POCSO Act, 2012; Sections 5(l), (n), (r) and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012; and Section 506(i) IPC (two counts). The … accused on 18.04.2021 at about 03.00 p.m., recorded his confession statement and remanded him to judicial custody. On 21.04.2021, she sent the accused through the Head Constables Thiru.Ramakrishnan and Thiru.Kumaresan to the Government Medical College Hospital, Ramanathapuram,

Dr Latha N N vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

before her. He submits that failure to report or record a case is punishable under Section 21 of the POCSO Act. Petitioner has been charge sheeted only for the said offences. He, however, does not dispute that accused Nos.4, … punishable under Section 376 of IPC, Sections 6 and 21 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, is before this Court with a prayer

Sari Vinod vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

with Sec. 34, though according to the petitioner, there are ingredients to disclose offences under Sec. 7 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and under Sec. 354, 354A, 354B of the I.P.C. Further that the 4 th respondent Sub Inspector of … respondent is being heavily influenced by the accused persons and that he has charged only minor offences as Sec. 341, 323, 294(b) read with Sec. 34, though according to the petitioner, there are ingredients to disclose offences … about 6.30 p.m. in respect of the alleged incidents which happened on 21.8.2020 at 1 p.m. The allegations therein are to the effect that the

Gaya Prasad Pal @ Mukesh vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the punishment it was awarding, further directed as under :-"―COMPENSATION U/SEC. 7 POCSO RULES, 2012 Section 33(8) of POCSO Act, 2012 provides that in appropriate cases, compensation may be prescribed to the child. Rule 7(2) of POCSO Rules, 2012 … own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.‖. Crl. A. No.538/2016 Page 21 of 72 ―Section 3 of POCSO Act 3. Penetrative sexual assault.- A person is said to commit "penetrative

State Of Karnataka By Vs. Gireesh

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

they had also 1 (2022)2 SCC7414 Crl.A.No.873/2017 committed the offence punishable under Sections 506 of the IPC and Section 21 of POCSO Act.17. The learned Additional SPP would further submit that the learned Sessions Judge has completely ignored … and she was a minor and she comes under the definition of “child” as per the provisions of POCSO Act 2012.46. In this case, PWs-1, 2, 11, 12, and 15 are material witnesses. Other witnesses, who are related to

State of Karnataka by vs Gireesh

Court : Karnataka

had also (2022)2 SCC 74 14 Crl.A.No.873/2017 committed the offence punishable under Sections 506 of the IPC and Section 21 of POCSO Act.17. The learned Additional SPP would further submit that the learned Sessions Judge has completely ignored … and she was a minor and she comes under the definition of “child” as per the provisions of POCSO Act 2012.46. In this case, PWs-1, 2, 11, 12, and 15 arematerial witnesses. Other witnesses, who are related to the