Advanced Search Results

State of Karnataka Vs. Nagaraja

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

a girl aged 17 years and she will be a ‘child’ for all practical purposes. The provisions of POCSO Act, 2012, are stringent and special courts have been established to deal with such offences against children, whether girls or … No.17/2015 BY THE I JUDGE, SESSIONS ADDL. AND SPL. 2 CHICKKAMAGALURU, GRANTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS363114,366A, 376 R/W34OF IPC AND SEC.4,6,17 OF POCSO ACT AND CANCEL THE SAID ORDER OF BAIL. DIRECT THAT THE … about the incident, in her statement recorded by the magistrate under Section 164, Cr.P.C. The learned judge is stated to have ignored the fact that

Manikandan vs the State Rep by,

Court : Chennai

Inspector of Police (P.W.16)had registered an F.I.R. (Ex.P11) for the offences under Sections 3 read with 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.5. Police Constable (P.W.8) had taken the

Mantram @ Mantra @ Sonu vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

@ Sonu for the offences punishable under Sections 363 IPC, 506 IPC, 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Submissions on behalf of the Appellant19. The submission on behalf of the Appellant by the ld. Counsel for … Section 6 of the POCSO Act wasamended by Protection of Children from Sexual Offence (Amendment) Act, 2019, w.e.f. 16.08.2019. The offence in the present case was committed on 13.03.2017 and therefore, the punishment prescribed for Section 6

Surender Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

amended and Section under Section 12 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “POCSO Act”) read with Section 11 POCSO Act, was added against the Petitioner.2. Briefly stated, the Petitioner is the maternal … as well.8. After registration of FIR, the statement of the Child “A” was recordedby the Police under Section 161 Cr.P.C on 02.05.2017 and the statement of the Child “M” was recorded on 02.06.2017.9. The statement of the

Nawabbudin Vs. State Of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Court held the accused guilty for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(i) of IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The Trial Court sentenced the 3 accused to undergo life imprisonment and also directed to pay monetary fine … violence and it has observed that “no violence against children is justifiable; all violence against children is preventable” 16 10. Keeping in mind the aforesaid objects and to achieve what has been provided under Article 15 and

Sudhakumari V. vs State of Kerala Represented by the Home Secretary

Court : Kerala

u/s.366, 370(4), 354A(1), 354D, 376(2)(n), 376(3) IPC, Sec.5(1) r/w Sec.6, Sec.11(iv) r/w. Sec.12, and Sec.16(1)(3) r/w Sec.17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 in Crime No.758/2022. There are 2 accused in the above case. Accused No.1 Jitheesh S.S., S/o.Shibu was granted … though the FIR mentions various offences, the FIS as well as the statement of the victim recorded under Sec.164 Cr.P.C. does not disclose any offences against the detenu and even the Final Report in the 2nd crime

Irappa Vs. State of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Criminal

victim who is aged five years. Despite of it, the trial Court has held conviction u/S4and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Even the accused did not commit the offence as an aggravated penetrative sexual assault as u/S6of the POCSO … the accused as u/S7of the POCSO Act instead of Sec. 4 and 16 6 of the POCSO Act relating to penetrative sexual assault as well … STATION, BAILHONGAL.-. APPELLANT - (BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, GOVT. PLEADER) RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C. AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS

Adhimoolam vs State by

Court : Chennai

for the offences under Sections 366(A) and 376 of the IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012, before the Mahila Fast Track Court, Tiruvannamalai, which was taken on file as Spl.S.C.No.93 of 2018. During the … the conviction and sentence imposed upon him for the __________Page 1 of 16 offence under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act vide judgment … Rep. by Inspector of Police, Thellar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Cr.No.70/2016. ... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions

Sathish Kumar Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Pol ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

7 of the POCSO Act and imposed a punishment of three years Rigorous Imprisonment under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, 2012. Further, it directed him to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-, only in default of payment of the said … that the trial Court compared the evidence of P.W.1 (victim) with that of her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and in fact, on the side of the Appellant/A1 (defence side) many contradictions

Rahul Dev Mandal @ Rahul vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

sentence dated 06.06.2015, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.201/2013, registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and 4 POCSO Act, 2012 P.S. Chankyapuri whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO … of age. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the child victim has mentioned her age as 16 years in the MLC as well as at the time of recording of her statement under Section 164